Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Seeks To "reschedule" Pension Payments  
User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3288 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2836 times:

Looks like liquidity is still a problem at US... AFA and IAM members most hit by this plan.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040816/dcm053_1.html

"Rescheduling these payments will help US Airways to conserve its cash so that we have sufficient liquidity to operate the airline," said Jerry Glass, US Airways senior vice president of Employee Relations. "This is an important step as we work to ensure our survival and future prosperity."

Looks like US wants to take this years payments, and spread them out over the next 5 years. Didn't UA try this and get shot down in court?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2798 times:

You're allowed to post a whole press release. Or did you just want to pull out the worst-sounding paragraph?  Laugh out loud

I have no idea what UA did or didn't try to do, but this is apparently an IRS issue, not a PBGC issue.

-----------------------------------------------------------

US AIRWAYS SEEKS TO SPREAD OUT PENSION PAYMENTS

ARLINGTON, Va., Aug. 16, 2004 -- US Airways today said it will ask the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for authority, as permitted under IRS rules, to reschedule contributions to the defined benefit pension plans for the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) and the International Association of Machinists (IAM), representing mechanical and related employees.

"Rescheduling these payments will help US Airways to conserve its cash so that we have sufficient liquidity to operate the airline," said Jerry Glass, US Airways senior vice president of Employee Relations. "This is an important step as we work to ensure our survival and future prosperity."

A letter has been sent to employees in both work groups explaining the company’s action. The two plans would be treated the same under the proposed payment rescheduling.

Under IRS rules, US Airways is required to make contributions of approximately $67.5 million total to the AFA and IAM plans for the 2004 plan year. If the application for a waiver is approved, the company will be able to spread out these contributions for the 2004 plan year for up to five years, rather than the 18 months during which the contributions otherwise would have been made.

Because US Airways already has contributed $28.6 million to the AFA and IAM plans during 2004, the company intends to apply that amount toward the last 2003 plan year payment, which is due on Sept. 15.

The proposed payment rescheduling would have no impact on retirees. For current employees, pension benefits will still begin when an employee retires and continue throughout the employee’s lifetime.

Reporters needing additional information should contact US Airways Corporate Affairs at (703) 872-5100.



I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3288 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2720 times:

I didn't realize that I could post the whole article.

Given USAirways track record with pension funds, I'm sure I'd be nervous if it was my pension! Can you just imagine? "Hey we can't pay it now, otherwise we wouldn't have the liquidity (i.e. cash) that we need to do business. But trust us, we'll pay it back eventually..."

Sooner or later, the good folks at US are going to realize that they should get what they can now, because there won't be much left in the future. Leveraging the future to pay for today is a bad way to do business!


User currently offlineMikey711MN From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1397 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2694 times:

"Leveraging the future to pay for today is a bad way to do business!"

But an effective way to lead the country apparently...  Confused

(sorry, just had to...  Big grin)



I plan on living forever. So far, so good...
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2654 times:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6510-2004Aug16.html

"Randy Clerihue, a spokesman for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., said that for the IRS to agree to such a request, the airline must make available appropriate collateral."

"Such requests of the IRS are not uncommon. Last year, Northwest Airlines Corp. won approval from the tax agency to stretch out payments of $454 million into its pension plan for its salaried and contract employees over five years."



I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlineN801NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 744 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2628 times:

The New York Times article pegs NWA's collateral as landing slots, Pacific route authorities, aircraft, and engines. Just in case the worst should happen.

User currently offlineORD2PHL From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 312 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

The New York Times article pegs NWA's collateral as landing slots, Pacific route authorities, aircraft, and engines. Just in case the worst should happen.


And....of course the DC-9's.....sorry, just had to.


ORD2PHL


User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3288 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2591 times:

Mikey -

You and I agree on that issue. Too bad there was 30 years of examples to follow when the other party controlled Congress, huh?  Yeah sure

(I couldn't resist either!)


User currently offlineAa717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2558 times:

This is a common, but uncomfortable thing for airlines with cash flow problems to do. As much as we'd all like to see USAir fail Insane ...

Seriously, the high fuel costs have screwed up everyone's projections and this is a convenient way to save cash.TC



FL450, M.85
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Will US Airlines Return To The "black?" posted Fri Feb 4 2005 18:16:44 by 7E72004
AP: "Northwest Seeks OK For Flights To Iraq" posted Thu May 8 2003 18:04:55 by AIR757200
Dramatic Flight:Go Around Sent Us To "Ground Zero" posted Tue Oct 8 2002 20:30:23 by Mirrodie
US Airlines... To Go "Low Cost" posted Sun Apr 7 2002 09:31:34 by Ibizajet A330
"Agreement" Reached Over US Access To LHR posted Mon Feb 28 2000 18:33:10 by Kaitak
Jetblue Sells 5 A320's To Germany's "Blue Wings" posted Sat Oct 7 2006 08:29:45 by Crogalski
UAL Chief, "expects Airline Deals To Come" posted Fri Sep 22 2006 15:23:49 by STT757
Delta Seeks To Shed Pilots' Pension posted Fri Sep 1 2006 16:37:51 by Gnomon
Airlines To Replace "No Smoking" With "No Mobile" posted Tue Aug 8 2006 10:45:46 by NWDC10
Delta Seeks To End Pilots Pension Plan posted Sat Aug 5 2006 07:08:41 by NWDC10