Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Going On Strike?!?!  
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6024 times:

In the opening post on this thread, the poster says that UA might be going on strike this weekend....what the heck?! Anyone know?!?

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1708237/

I searched some news websites MSNBC.com, CNN, and local news in my area and can't find anything. Please tell me this is NOT true and just pure speculation.


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
39 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6000 times:

Dude, here in Denver, if a guy overhears a conversation two off-duty rampers are having about the remote possibility of United going on strike in the way-distant future, it's all over the news.

Our local news hasn't reported anything on a UA strike, so it's a safe bet that they are not.


User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5983 times:

Makes me wonder where people get these stupid rumors AND why employees make stupid rumors in the first place....

Edited add:

Come to think of it, since UA is now in bankruptcy, do the employees have to have the bankruptcy court's permission to go on a strike or stage anything? I thought that since UA is in bankruptcy, all union contracts are null and void until UA emerges from Ch. 11. If the employees went on strike, it would be considered a illegal work action and would be contempt of court. Correct me if Im wrong in any of this.....

[Edited 2004-08-21 10:21:02]


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineCoa764 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 328 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5975 times:

It is a UK issue with their two unions Transport and General Workers Union (T&G) and Great Britain's General Union (GMB). Note the article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3582554.stm
It isn't UA that is on strike it would be the baggage handlers in the UK that are This kind of strike effects all the UK airports as well as any company that contracts employees in either union. As you read in the article it isn't happening.


[Edited 2004-08-21 10:23:29]


Please oh please Mr Moderator Nazi, dont delete my thread.
User currently offlineBritair From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 933 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5907 times:

Sorry to say it is true, a 2 second search on Google is all you nee to find out more....

From www.reuters.com...

LONDON (Reuters) - United Airlines ground staff at Heathrow airport plan to strike on August 27, a union says.

The Transport & General Workers Union said on Friday about 700 United Airlines baggage handlers and check-in staff at Heathrow would go on strike for 24 hours from 4:30 a.m. next Friday.

The union said in a statement that United staff plan to strike after rejecting the company's pay offer.

United is 20 months into a complex bankruptcy case.


This has also been reported in the Chicago press as well as extensively here in the UK.

Sorry guys, looks like UA LHR op's are to be severly disrupted next weekend. Like BA, I hope a resolution is found.

And this is just UA staff not all airlines at LHR.

[Edited 2004-08-21 12:44:37]

User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5838 times:

Wow, I hope it stays in London! I am flying UA out of LGA September 7th!

User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5798 times:

So UA puts the stranded pax on other carriers to get them back across the pond
and pays the other carriers to do so. This is an additional drain of cash UA needs so very much. Do those idiots realize they are only hurting themselves? An airline strike or slowdown is more cash down the drain. It just hastens, not retards the beginning of the end of the company. It puts them out in the street a lot faster. The rank and file will get the shaft. The guys in the ivory tower will find work a whole lot faster. Wake up dummies!
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineNYCAAer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 693 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5780 times:

But United may have trouble putting its stranded passengers on other airlines. I know the flights from LHR on AA are packed to the rafters. I'm sure BA and VS are just as full.

User currently offlineDaumueller From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 693 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5733 times:

well, they don't need other airliners seats - they just need some ground handlers from other airlines. probably, BD and LH will help them out or anything so there will be delays but not too many pax are stranded.

(just my speculation, but I guess, if they go on strike, that's how they'll handle it)

cheers,

ben


User currently offlineUadc8contrail From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1782 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5679 times:

not only is the lhr ua people threatening to strike, but ba has announced that they are not accepting any more res for that same weekend as they are in the same boat as ua. also this is only happening in the uk.


bus driver.......move that bus:)
User currently offlineBritair From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 933 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5652 times:

UADC8contrail, BA has reached agreement with their unions and the BA strike has been called off. United has not been so lucky, and the signs are that it will go ahead.

Eurostar is also striking, so not a fun Bank Holiday weekend for travellers  Sad


User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5608 times:

Doesn't it seem like somebody in Europe is always striking? They must be the unhappiest companies over their, maybe it is the rain and drizzle that brings the moral down. Smile

UAL 777 CONTRAIL


User currently offlineAlphascan From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 937 posts, RR: 13
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5583 times:

It gets worse.


If the London workers bring picket lines to U.S. airports, members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers will not cross them, said Randy Canale, president of the IAM district for United.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0408110157aug11,1,1705916.story?coll=chi-business-hed



"To he who only has a hammer in his toolbelt, every problem looks like a nail."
User currently offlineUnitedTristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5512 times:

Lets clear this up here and now. The CS people in LHR are not going to be striking in the states...They have already said this. They want to prove a point not shut the airline down. Also UA will be running a full schedule that day. They will be flying management employees from around the system to cover the striking employees. No Need to worry or blow this out to something bigger then it is.

-m

 Big thumbs up


User currently offlineTUGMASTER From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Jul 2004, 728 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5469 times:

Daumueller.
Lets get one thing straight. NO Union member from any other airline or ground handling company would go near UA aircraft or airlines that they handle next Friday, and this includes EK / NZ / BW / RG .
The reason UA are will be going on strike at LHR,is because the employees have bent over backwards to help the company after 9/11 and they have been offered an appalling pay offer which are linked to certain conditions that'll make there life at work worst that it is already. As NYCAAer has already stated, If UA can't fly there own aircraft they will have great difficulty trying to find space on other airlines. I know for a fact that AA is jam-packed at present and I should imagine VS and BA are also.

Perhaps some UA employee at LHR is an A.Nutter and can give us some more details.

RGDS

Tugmaster.


User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5310 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5292 times:

I also read, I think in the Chicago Tribune, that if UA's ramp workers at LHR go on strike, and aircraft at LHR are serviced by either scabs or a third-party contractor, UA ramp workers in the U.S. may refuse to service aircraft arriving from or departing for LHR.

If the British union does send employees to picket at U.S. airports (my guess would be IAD, JFK, ORD, DEN, and SFO) UA's unionized employees will not cross those lines, pursuant to their collective-bargaining agreements.

This will put UA in a very tough situation.


User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4120 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5195 times:

If the London workers bring picket lines to U.S. airports, members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers will not cross them, said Randy Canale, president of the IAM district for United.

Well, I suppose this could happen, but just because Canale said it doesn't mean it's going to happen. Canale isn't thought of too highly by many IAM employees. I think most would rather cross the line and get their paycheck than support a movement that's hurting their employer even more. But, that's the kind of world we live in. If you don't get your way, everyone else has to suffer too. Sad, truly sad...


User currently offlineIL76TD From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 289 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4829 times:

Thank god I'm flying UA/LH IAD-FRA-DXB next thursday, hopefully it won't effect anything else around europe.

User currently offlineBaw716 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2028 posts, RR: 27
Reply 18, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4249 times:

It is very disappointing that some of the unionized workers can't see beyond their own personal situations. If United takes a strike hit-any kind of strike hit-then it is conceivable that the banks may pull their financing. No bank is going to commit over $1B to United if its employees can't understand if they don't pull together, its over.

If Canale is going to be a leader of his union, then he needs to get his members to stand fully behind management. If the strikers in the UK don't have the support of the unions in the US, and the unions here come out strongly against the action at LHR, then they may save themselves. If they follow the strikers in LHR, then they are going to hurt a heck of a lot of people more than just themselves.

Calmer heads need to prevail now.



David L. Lamb, fmr Area Mgr Alitalia SFO 1998-2002, fmr Regional Analyst SFO-UAL 1992-1998
User currently offlineUadc8contrail From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1782 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 4044 times:

any lhrcs people here that can shed some light as to what glenn and his posee of high paying bean counters have offered??????


bus driver.......move that bus:)
User currently offlineScotron11 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 1178 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3928 times:

How many flights does UA operate out of LHR on a daily basis? And what are these wonderful unions trying to achieve? How much money will be in their members pockets if UAL pulled out of LHR?

Like I've said before, these unions are rotten and well past their sell by date!


User currently offlineIsitsafenow From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 21, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3878 times:

I think Glenn and the "high paying" bean counters are offering a way to keep a job, keep working and even an outside shot at retirement because what is being used now doesn't work and the whole bunch including the bean counters are heading for a real big train wreck and unemployment.
safe



If two people agree on EVERYTHING, then one isn't necessary.
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3870 times:

well, they don't need other airliners seats - they just need some ground handlers from other airlines. probably..

Not if the pilots, gate agents and f/a's refuse to cross the picket line, which is likely.


User currently offlineUadc8contrail From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1782 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3833 times:

ual alpa would cross in a heart beat if it meant getting paid even to sit on the tarmac....with "brakes released"they nor afa and the upper mgmt that has "contracts" at ua give a rats a$$ about anyone except them selves....all randy is doing is driving the short yellow bus down the same road that the ea people rode back in the 90s...........


bus driver.......move that bus:)
User currently offlineJC5280 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 530 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (10 years 4 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 3818 times:

TUGMASTER....

Lets get one thing straight. NO Union member from any other airline or ground handling company would go near UA aircraft or airlines that they handle next Friday, and this includes EK / NZ / BW / RG .


This is not true becuase UA already has another ground handler lined up to handle the flights that day. In fact, UA is planning on handling the flights regardless of what happens with the unions. The same holds true in the US. The IAM plans to work these flights in IAD, ORD, JFK, and SFO. If there are any IAM employees that choose not to work these inbounds, they will be disciplined (and alone) as usual. Canale is full of @#$% and the rest of the IAM group does not always follow what he claims.


25 AirframeAS : Ok I asked this in post # 2: Come to think of it, since UA is now in bankruptcy, do the employees have to have the bankruptcy court's permission to go
26 Frontiers4ever : They probably wont strike but if they do then. They might as well start looking for a job. -Frontiers4ever
27 Ual777contrail : You Brits are making this look like it serious. Nothing is going to happen. Some of the folks who have responded have make some good comments, however
28 N754PR : If UA did strike they would be finished.......... once and for all!!
29 EMBQA : AirframeAS- I 'think' no matter what condition an airline is in, no employee group union or not can do a 'wildcat' strike due to the Railway Act. A st
30 Uadc8contrail : this could be a way for glenn to finally start contracting out everything from cs,ramp and cargo.....if we have any lhr or euro people in here...can y
31 Lutfi : The stike is by UK employees & union, so the Railway Act does not apply. There are plenty of jobs around in London, so the UA employees there won't be
32 FriendlySkies : There are plenty of jobs around in London, so the UA employees there won't be too bothered if UA does go away. Why don't they just quit you ask? Proba
33 AirframeAS : AirframeAS..? what airline are you with now in PHX...? EMBQA, Im with no one right now. I resume A&P school tomorrow morning at IWA. Once Im done with
34 Ual777contrail : United Airlines Statement Regarding London Heathrow Strike Announcement CHICAGO, August 19, 2004 – The Transport and General Workers Union, rep
35 AirframeAS : Send some furloughed UA employees to replace the LHR employees during this strike. Just my opinion....
36 Post contains links StevenUhl777 : Settled! No more threat of a strike! UAL was really smart to get this settled quick and avoid further disruption. There is a press release on the http
37 Adh214 : Why does United have 700 CS and Ramp workers in London? Doesn't that seem high for ahout a dozen flights a day? Andrew
38 Algoz : Apart from it's own operations at LHR, UA also provides ground handling for various other airlines: NZ/EK/BW in customer service, plus a few more in r
39 Ual777contrail : adh214, No, that doesn't seem high. UAL Had 93 employees in AKL before we pulled out, only 2 flights their. When you have CS,FLT ATT. RED CARPET,MECHA
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
YYZ Customs & Immigration Starts Going On Strike posted Wed Aug 15 2001 22:29:01 by Red Panda
Is Virgin Going On Strike? posted Tue Mar 6 2001 05:26:59 by QANTAS747-438
What Was Going On With UA At IAH Today posted Wed Mar 8 2006 01:58:30 by Aggieflyboi04
What's Going On With The UA 744 Parked At AMS? posted Tue Mar 8 2005 18:31:24 by KLMCedric
What Is Going On At Alitalia? Strike! posted Tue Feb 22 2005 09:17:20 by PanAmerican
UA On Strike? posted Fri May 12 2000 18:07:58 by UAPilot7
UA At EWR- Is Something Going On? posted Sat Jan 29 2000 19:21:40 by UAPilot7
What's Been Going On At MAN Today? posted Sun Nov 26 2006 19:53:46 by AirbusA346
What Is Going On With FLG5738? posted Sun Nov 26 2006 17:45:47 by Onetogo
What's Going On At IND? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 23:02:43 by Ward86IND