Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Singapore To New York Nonstop: Why EWR?  
User currently offlineAT From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1049 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 9624 times:


Just curious, why is the new Singapore Airlines nonstop to Newark ? I would have thought JFK would be a more logical choice. Or may be not?

Also, I know they're aiming for the business market, but I still don't understand why they don't have First Class on the Airbus 340-500. Don't you get the most First Class passengers on the longest flights?


15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKl911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 5214 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9519 times:

EWR offers more domestic connections.

KL911


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9481 times:

Not that this issue hasnt been addressed numerous times over... but anyways, it didnt have anything to do with connections.

Quite simply, SQ didnt feel it could justify three destinations into NYC concurrently in todays market. It would have to ax either FRA-JFK (highly profitable) or AMS-EWR (weakly/not profitable).

They chose EWR for that purpose, simple as that.



User currently offlineCAL From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 499 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9455 times:

You got it and EWR is closer to the City anyway.


CAL........Continental Airlines....... Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9439 times:

...well, Manhattan yes.

Tough to be closer to "the city" than JFK, which is in the city.  Big grin


User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9419 times:

SQ's non-stop service was aimed especially at business travelers, and SQ said that EWR was the best airport for these travelers (although it has been argued that EWR is only closer for some places in NYC and that JFK is closer for other places) - although other reasons, including ConcordeBoy's reply, were factors.

 Smile
-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineFlyguy1 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1740 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9410 times:

EWR is closer to certain parts of Manhattan, not the whole boro. So SQ could not make a double daily service into JFK work? CX, and other Asian airlines seem to be successful at doing this.


727, L1011, MD80, A300, 777-200, 737-300, 737-700, 747-400, 757-200, 737-800, A320. E190, E135, 767-200, CRJ9
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9363 times:

So SQ could not make a double daily service into JFK work?

Their last attempt at that (JFK-FRA/AMS) failed






User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9353 times:

So SQ could not make a double daily service into JFK work? CX, and other Asian airlines seem to be successful at doing this.
SQ is unique in that it had JFK-FRA-SIN and would also have JFK-SIN. Other carriers, including Asian carriers, have additional service, or service from other airports (such as BA and VS with service from EWR and JFK to LHR).

CX has JFK-YVR-HGK service, as well as direct JFK-HKG service. I believe that the JFK-YVR-HKG service is very profitable on the individual JFK-YVR and YVR-HKG segments, as well as the route on the whole.

For SQ, the only conceivable and logical way to get to SIN from NYC was doing the JFK-FRA-SIN (or EWR-AMS-SIN), compared to HKG where one could go to another Asian city first, fly to a different US city and then over to HKG, not to mention flying on another carrier (CO, for example). Simply put (as mentioned by ConcordeBoy), doing double JFK service would kill off the FRA routing, so they chose EWR where the AMS service would not be as affected.

 Smile
-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 9306 times:

so they chose EWR where the AMS service would not be as affected

...if of course, by "would not be as affected" you mean "terminated", then yeah  Laugh out loud


User currently offlineJBLUA320 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3179 posts, RR: 19
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 9225 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No no no you're all wrong.

It's because us New Jersey folk are dead sexy  Smile

JBLU


User currently offlineFlyguy1 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1740 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9148 times:

Concordeboy:
SQ never operated JFK 2x daily. The services to FRA, and AMS were operated on seperate days. FRA-JFK was 4/7, AMS/JFK was 3/7.



727, L1011, MD80, A300, 777-200, 737-300, 737-700, 747-400, 757-200, 737-800, A320. E190, E135, 767-200, CRJ9
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9007 times:

Flyguy1, actually not quite - FRA-JFK had been daily for quite a while, but went down to the 4 flights per week I think one or two years ago (might also have been after 9/11, but I'm not really sure when the cutback happened) - but it's been back to daily for a while again.

And wasn't the AMS flight into EWR anyhow? So it wouldn't have been JFK double-daily in any case...

Regards,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 8655 times:

The only thing that I can find is that SQ had 3x weekly SIN-AMS-EWR service which was discontinued when non-stop service started.

 Smile
-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 8424 times:

Actually all you guys were right:

JFK service started in 1992 with 3/7 via F-R-A and 3/7 via BRU. BRU-JFK was discontinued a year later and the 3/7 frequencies were routed via AMS. SIN-F RA-JFK went up to 4/7 later, thus giving SIA daily service to JFK.

In 1997, when SQ and LH started co-operating, FRA was upped to daily. That was when the 3/7 frequencies via AMS were routed to EWR. A 4th weekly flight was added later, before it was discontinued.

When the frequencies via F RA went up to daily, SQ initially planned to continue operating the AMS flights to JFK. However, because of flight timings (ie arrivals into both Europe and SIN), both services would have to depart JFK at about the same time. At that juncture, a decision was made to move the AMS flights to EWR.


User currently offlineKfrg From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 7497 times:

...well, Manhattan yes.

Tough to be closer to "the city" than JFK, which is in the city.


When people use the term "The City", they are reffering to the Borough of Manhattan, the financial district of NY. Queens is hardly "The City", it just happens to exist in the borders of the City of New York.


[Edited 2004-08-22 06:21:34]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Singapore Nonstop To New York posted Sun May 16 2004 18:03:15 by Bigphilnyc
Luton To New York (EWR) - Here We Come! posted Thu Oct 12 2006 22:52:09 by Gilesdavies
Singapore Airlines To Fly Non-Stop To New York posted Tue Jun 1 2004 00:21:11 by Squirrel83
Why Not MH And SQ To New York Via Syria Or Lebanon posted Sat Jun 14 2003 16:31:51 by Airmale
Why Doesnt Southwest Fly From Atlanta To New York? posted Wed Jun 7 2000 03:59:54 by Elite_Flyer
Aerolíneas Argentinas Non Stop To New York posted Sat Oct 14 2006 14:13:41 by Cedars747
Emirates To Fly Hamburg To New York posted Thu Oct 12 2006 16:48:34 by Semsem
Iranian Leader To New York posted Wed Sep 20 2006 01:34:00 by NYCA330
History Of London To New York On BA / Boac posted Sun Jan 15 2006 04:11:24 by Cedarjet
Fastest Service From Auckland To New York posted Fri Jan 13 2006 20:43:17 by IsuA380B777