Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
...that Never Crashed –––> Until First Crash  
User currently offlineOB1783P From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 326 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 7640 times:

The recent thread about A/C that have not yet experienced a catastrophic hull loss with fatalities has reminded me of the long period during which Airbus planes flew without accidents.

Air France introduced the A300 in 1974, and, if I'm not mistaken, there were no major accidents until Iran Air in 1988. And that one could hardly be blamed on the plane.

After that, Airbus planes have had a fine safety record, comparable with airliners of the same generation(s).

If China Airlines and Thai had not been Airbus clients, the Airbus record would have been even better (and I'm saying that as someone who would be delighted to fly CI or TG any day).

And what I bring up about Airbus was true of the Boeings of the time too. The Lauda catastrophe was quite a while after the intro of the big twins.

The first generation of jets certainly didn't wait 14 plus years to experience trouble. In any case, in those pre-simulator days, the airlines were experiencing horrific training accidents.

And now it looks (knock on wood, as someone said on the other thread) like the new generation will break that record.

Still, if someone had asked me, say on Jan 1, 2000, to name 2 airliner+airline combo that would NOT crash that year, I might have answered "Air France Concorde, and Singapore 744".

About 15 years ago, I remember an Economist article predicting a major hull loss per WEEK by now! I don't think the traffic figures did keep up with the projections in that article, but no matter, flying today is safe, safe, safe...


I've flown thousands of miles and I can tell you it's a lot safer than crossing the street!
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLYSSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7412 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7508 times:

The first crash of an Airbus A300 was not Iran Air in 1988. Which was not a crash actually ...

The first crash of an A300 occured on Dec.18th 1983 on approach to KUL. The aircraft (OY-KAA) sold by SAS to Malaysian Airlines System
was operating the delivery flight from ARN.

Another A300 accident occured on sept.21st 1987, at Luxor (Egypt) where an Egypt'Air A300-B4 (SU-BCA) crashed during a training session, killing all crew on board.


User currently offlineSpacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3629 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7383 times:

About 15 years ago, I remember an Economist article predicting a major hull loss per WEEK by now!

Odd, I remember the exact same prediction. I believe I saw it on CBS News, which probably regurgitated it because it was so alarming (and came from a reputable source).

Though I'm sure that prediction had a lot of qualifiers around it - I do remember them saying things like "at the current rate of expansion" and "if nothing's done to improve our air traffic control system". Of course, the system has been improved, and air traffic has not expanded quite that quickly. But still, it is pretty amazing how safe air travel is today compared to even 10-15 years ago - at best I'd have thought the total number of accidents would have stayed pretty constant, but it's actually dropped. And the accident rate has dropped by a lot.



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 7359 times:

About 15 years ago, I remember an Economist article predicting a major hull loss per WEEK by now!

But that was before USAir straightened up and got on the ball. :-P


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 7234 times:

Still, if someone had asked me, say on Jan 1, 2000, to name 2 airliner+airline combo that would NOT crash that year, I might have answered "Air France Concorde

...why?

It'd have been one of my first suggestions for one that would  Crying


User currently offlineBlueDuck From Singapore, joined Aug 2004, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 6876 times:

The Boeing 767...

Apart from the Lauda Air which chrashed soon after takeoff in bangkok.
All the other accidents involving 767s were ET(hijacked and had to make emergency landing in water), MS(suicide), and the UA,AA(into the twin towers).

Overall. the 767 has been a pretty safe airline.


User currently offlineVimanav From India, joined Jul 2003, 1516 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5926 times:

Air France introduced the A300 in 1974, and, if I'm not mistaken, there were no major accidents until Iran Air in 1988.

The first crash of an A300 occured on Dec.18th 1983 on approach to KUL. The aircraft (OY-KAA) sold by SAS to Malaysian Airlines System
was operating the delivery flight from ARN.


Actually neither was the first. On 17MAR82 an AF A300B4, F-BVGK while taking off from Sanaa experienced an uncontailed failure of the stage 1 HP compressor disk of the no. 2 engine. The fuel tank was punctured by debris and the aircraft caught fire. None of the 124 on board lost their lives but the aircraft was lost.

The Malaysian incident was the second. The third was an Indian Airlines A300B2, VT-ELV which overran the runway after a bird hit on 29SEP86. The aircraft was damaged beyond repair.

rgds//Vimanav



Sarfaroshi kii tamannaa ab hamaare dil mein hai, Dekhnaa hai zor kitnaa baazu-e-qaatil mein hai
User currently offlineScorpio From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 5032 posts, RR: 43
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5476 times:

Blueduck,

You're forgetting the AirChina 767 that crashed in 2002:

http://aviation-safety.net/database/2002/020415-0.htm


User currently offlineDeltaBOS From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 21 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4291 times:

Don't forget the AA A300 that crashed into Queens on takeoff from JFK in November of '01.

User currently offlineWarren747sp From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1162 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4176 times:

@Scorpio
yes, I guess CA pilot errors are responsible for loss of B767 airframe.



747SP
User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2935 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3993 times:

As far as I remember the Malaysia Airlines A300 crash (then known as Malaysian Airline System) - was NOT on its delivery flight but was operating on the SIN-KUL shuttle service in the early evening and there was a terrible monsoon storm that night. I remember watching the news soon after that night and the camera crews were on-site filming the rescue operations and there were people being pulled out from the wreckage. Amazingly - all passengers survived the crash as it crashed short of runway 33 at Subang Airport. I seem to remember the aircraft was actually on lease from SAS...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Johan Ljungdahl
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrew Abshier



User currently offlineFlyingColours From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2315 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3925 times:

Well PIA flew an A300 (Might have been an A310) into a mountain.

A large number of A300/A310 Write offs have involved either pilot error or CFIT. Of course there have been some exceptions.

Phil
FlyingColours



Lifes a train racing towards you, now you can either run away or grab a chair & a beer and watch it come - Phil
User currently offlineMas777 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 2935 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3754 times:

Indeed PIA had an unfortunate accident which claimed the life of a friend's sister who was on her GAP year whilst travelling to Nepal. That was after '88 though (in response to the original thread topic).

User currently offlineFLYSSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7412 posts, RR: 57
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3700 times:

Vimanav,

Air France's A300-B4 F-BVGK DID NOT CRASH. Take off was aborted after an explosion in the GRT 2.
Crew and PAX evacuated safely but the a/c was damaged beyond repair by fire, because of the late intervention of the fire brigade at Sana'a Airport.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The First Jet That Never Took Off! posted Sun Feb 22 2004 08:56:53 by Zippyjet
The Nasa 707 That Was Crashed, What A/L? posted Wed Sep 13 2006 06:17:06 by 747hogg
Airliners That Never Were posted Fri Mar 17 2006 23:47:42 by StarGoldLHR
Models Of A/c That Never Were? posted Fri Mar 17 2006 16:31:17 by CalAir
Northwest: Old Rules And A Future That Never Came posted Mon Oct 24 2005 00:12:49 by Matt D
Are There Any Airlines That Never Got Accident? posted Sun May 1 2005 23:04:31 by Palladium
A340 And A330 Orders That Never Materialised. Why? posted Wed Feb 16 2005 14:39:25 by Juventus
What Airliners Have Never Crashed? posted Fri Aug 20 2004 19:49:23 by FRAspotter
Is CO The Only US Carrier That Never Flew BOS-Eur? posted Wed Jul 7 2004 17:36:50 by Zrs70
Experimental C/s That Never Were...... posted Mon Apr 12 2004 02:50:26 by UK_Dispatcher