Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Are SQ Retiring Their 744s?  
User currently offlineQF744 From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 8648 times:

I was just reading the press release about SQ ordering the 773ER and noted that they are retiring their 744s..

On certain routes, would SQ not be better keeping the 744s (eg SYD-SIN, SIN-LHR etc)... i mean these flights do have good loads, so why drop the size of the plane... surely this will dent their annual profits?

i'm sure QF could do with a few of the 744s!

Also, SQ have canned the Airbus and Boeing proposals for regional routes!

here is the part of the press release..

"The order reinforces SIA's standing as the biggest customer for the Boeing
777. SIA presently flies fifty-five B777s, and has another four B777s on
firm order. With this latest order, the number of B777s in the SIA fleet
will eventually reach seventy-seven units.

"The B777-300ER, seating about 350 passengers and with a range of 7,000 nm, will be deployed on SIA's long-haul and medium-haul routes. The new order will allow SIA to achieve capacity growth of between 4 and 6 per cent a
year. At the same time, it will maintain SIA's fleet as one of the industry
's youngest, as the B747-400 is progressively retired.

"SIA had also sought proposals from manufacturers for suitable aircraft to
operate on its regional routes. The manufacturers offered the Airbus
A330-200 and the new Boeing 7E7 for evaluation. SIA has decided not to
place any order for the regional aircraft because the proposals submitted
did not meet SIA's financial criteria. The airline will continue to use the
B777-200 to serve the regional routes.



IT'S ALL ABOUT THE UPPER DECK
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 11846 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8496 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

SQ are only retiring their oldest B744s at the moment so SQ will be keeping a good amount of B744s

User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4091 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8490 times:

SQ wants to keep a very young fleet. They also get more commonality/cheaper costs with the 773ERs they just ordered. Those 744s will be picked up by other carriers, they still have a good 15 years left in 'em I believe.

User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8482 times:

On certain routes, would SQ not be better keeping the 744s (eg SYD-SIN, SIN-LHR etc)
The A380 would be much better on those routes.  Big grin

"as the B747-400 is progressively retired"
The oldest 744s are leaving soon, although the keyword is "progressively", meaning that tomorrow morning, the 744s are not going to be gone (they will most likely be retired as the 380s and 773ERs come).

-Will
Edited to add an "e" on what was "thos"

[Edited 2004-08-26 04:20:40]


"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineNWAFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1893 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8451 times:

Gosh it must be nice to be subsidized by a country.


THANK YOU FOR FLYING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9106 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8363 times:

MOST of them will stay for a while. They are only replacing the oldest B 747-400s. NOT THE ENTIRE FLEET FOR A WHILE!

If Boeing builds a B 747 Advanced, again, I am sure they will order some, let's say 25-30.


User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2910 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8308 times:

With the number of A380 and 773ERs on order, they will be retiring the 744 progressively. A380 will take-over the highest capacity routes such as SIN-LHR/NRT/SYD and increase frequencies to places where there aren't slot controlled airports with 773ER/772ER.

Perhaps pax version will be gone by 2010, which the newest 744 will be 8/9 years old. Remember this is a carrier that a 10-year old plane is old. For a certain red/silver colored US carrier that's still like fresh-off the line.


User currently offline7673mech From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 696 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8270 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

NWAFA:
The fact that they are government subsidized has nothing to do with it.
They are well run and efficient. Their fleet is well maintained and their employees are highly motivated. When SARS hit their government didn't bail them out, they made the tough cuts necessary to sustain a viable concern

Historically, Singapore turns over its fleet regularly. They do this to keep costs down ... higher resale values, not having to pay for more expensive heavier checks ... etc.


User currently offlinePhilsquares From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8248 times:

NWAFA:

As a SQ employee, I can assure you SQ is not subsidized! It is 57% owned by a holding company that is controlled by the Singapore government. However, there is no money from the government. In fact, the flow seems to be from SIA to the gov't in the form of dividends.

SIA has always had a young fleet. In fact, NWA bought some of our old 747F freighters if I'm not mistaken and they are some of the youngest classics in the NWA fleet.



User currently offlineLutfi From China, joined Sep 2000, 759 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 8170 times:

Highly motivated...? Lol. So why are so many of the SQ managers resigning at the moment...

User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8434 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7961 times:

SQ is a well run company with alot of cash. To the best of my knowlege in the entire time they have been operating they have only ever once posted a loss and that was in 2002 or 2003 and was mainly caused by the effects of SARS.


User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1245 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7928 times:

"Gosh it must be nice to be subsidized by a country."

This statement can be applied to Emirates Airlines, not Singapore Airlines. Look at EK's aircraft order plans for the next decade, their products & route expansion. That's oil money for ya!

Hkg82.


User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10360 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 7848 times:

The earliest 744s of SIA are now 15 years old and I believe with the xception of the airline´s beginnings they never had any aircraft which they kept for so long.
I also expect the 744 pax aircraft to be gone from SIAs fleet by 2010 completely.
Be sure that by then the first 20 or so 777s of SIA will be retired as well btw. That´s just SIA policy, they´re always the no.1 forerunners (threatened here by Emirates and Virgin nowadays)


User currently offlineFRAspotter From United States of America, joined May 2004, 2336 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 7823 times:

According to this website airfleets.net the AVERAGE age of SIA 747's is 8 years.

http://www.airfleets.net/ageflotte/?file=calcop&opp=Singapore%20Airlines



"Drunks run stop signs. Stoners wait for them to turn green."
User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7073 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 7786 times:

Who are buying up the 744's being retired? Are NZ going to get their hands on a couple of them? I feel that the NZ 747 fleet is a bit stretched.

User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5191 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7719 times:

Yes the NZ 744 fleet is highly utilized but I don't think they will want any more with the new 772 fleet arriving starting next year and those SQ 744's are P/W powered and NZ already operate GE and RR so I don't think they will want to add another engine type. That said as much as I would love them to get more 744's.

Sad to see SQ retiring the 744 pax aircraft but atleast they will be around for another 6-7 years yet.


User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7073 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7700 times:

Thanks for clearing it up NBT

User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10360 posts, RR: 11
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7672 times:

NZ no way. They have already a small, but odd 744 fleet powered by RRs and GEs. SIAs 744s have PW-engines.

SIAs early 744s which are currently withdrawn from the fleet are going or have gone to Air Atlanta/Iberia, Air India, Cathay Pacific and Dragonair. That are the known takers at the moment. Air Atlanta will most likely take more when the now 22 years-plus ex NZ/CX-742s need to be replaced in the next years. I could see NWA take some, and probably El Al in the form of SFs. And midterm all the airlines who operate aging classic freighters and pax-aircraft. Atlas, Evergreen, Kalitta, Polar, and so on.


User currently offlineChangyou From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 267 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 6807 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As a cabin crew for SQ...I'm glad that SQ decided to get rid of the 744s. They have so much problem with the cabin and galleys thus opening up complains to passengers...Geez...All hands raise for the 777-300ER!!

User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1435 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4672 times:

Carpethead is correct: The current thinking is that it is more profitable to operate more frequent point-to-point services with smaller aircraft. Hence, 772s and 773ERs will be deployed on those routes where slots and bilaterals allow higher frequency of service. The A380's niche is high density routes where slots and/or bilaterals do not allow extra frequencies, or where desirable landing and takeoff slots are hard to come by.

I hate to break this to the people who want the 744s to stay for a while, but my understanding is that the current plan is to phase them out completely; target phaseout date is around 2007 or so. Also, no passenger versions of the 744 Advanced are currently under serious consideration.


As a SQ employee, I can assure you SQ is not subsidized!

Philsquares is correct. The only direct government assistance is in the form of loan guarantees.


[Edited 2004-08-26 22:20:30]

User currently offlineElcapi1980 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4298 times:

I was trying to get how old are those DC9- from northwest, but they are not listed. does anybody know this?...



I love you barranquilla!!!!!
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9106 posts, RR: 15
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3601 times:

Well nothing is official about the 100% retirement of the B 744s. At least not for now. So I guess they will stay for a while. At least the newer ones, not the oldest ones.

I am sure they will consider the B 747 Advanced when things become more SOLID. Right now, everything is still at planning stage. So I hope they will consider it one day.


User currently offlineTRENT500 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 97 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3306 times:

Long live the 744's.
Airbus might be more practicle but look shite.
Long live Boeing.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is SQ Using Their B772 On Regional Routes? posted Sun Sep 26 2004 16:18:07 by Fluorine
Why Did SQ Supersize Their Logo On A345? posted Sat Jun 12 2004 21:20:28 by SQ452
Why Are SQ´s A343s Named Celestar? posted Sat Jun 1 2002 21:26:58 by KM732
Why Are Airlines Taking Their Logo Off? posted Thu Jan 3 2002 05:58:46 by Vafi88
Why Are MD's Called Mad Dogs? posted Fri Dec 1 2006 08:59:16 by Australia1
Why Did Virgin Drop Their Signature Tail Design posted Wed Nov 22 2006 12:01:26 by 777way
Why Are Passengers So Rude To Pilots? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 18:04:42 by Flyf15
Why No SQ, CX & TG Service At IAD? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 14:59:37 by Mk777
Why Are Fares So Low At PIT? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 20:20:20 by ATLAaron
Why Are DAS Air Cargo Allowed To Fly? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 17:19:01 by Bh4007