FriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4003 posts, RR: 6 Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1232 times:
I know CO flies 145LRs to ORD, not sure from where, but I'd imagine they use them for longer distances. They have plenty of standard 145's for everything else.
Smcmac32msn From United States of America, joined May 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 5 Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1231 times:
MSN gets a CO 145 "XR" from CLE, 1x daily.... its for eXtended Range.
Hey Obama, keep the change! I want my dollar back.
COEWRNJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1061 posts, RR: 21 Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1177 times:
The ERJ-145XR is the Extended Range version and that is the plane that is used on the long distance RJ flights such as EWR-OKC or IAH- Bakersfield and then of course all the other Express flights where scheduled. This was also CO/COEX's first plane with winglets. The ERJ-145LR I believe stands for Long Range. The 145LR that you see in ORD comes from CLE more than likely as I believe the RJ's you would see that come from IAH would be the XR's although I could be mistaken. The 145LR is pretty much used system wide except for the long haul RJ routes.
I would like to know however what the difference between the 145 and the 145LR is.
Boeing727 From United States of America, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 934 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1136 times:
The standard EMB145 (EP/MP models) carries 9200 lbs of fuel, whereas the LR version carries 11,484 lbs of fuel. I am not quite sure about the XR version, since we do not fly the aircraft, but the Legacy has a fuel capacity of 17,761 lbs.
UAXDXer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 765 posts, RR: 3 Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1132 times:
I recently flown the COEX ERJX from ONT-IAH, way too long of a flight for any RJ.
It takes a bug to hit a windsheild but it takes guts to stick
Aeroflot777 From Russia, joined Mar 2004, 2957 posts, RR: 30 Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1129 times:
When I flew CO to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico from Houston the aircraft we used was the EMB145XR. And by the way its avery comfy aircraft, with lots of legroom.
EMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9286 posts, RR: 13 Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1089 times:
The only real differance.....
The EMB-145ER has a dry center wing box. (fuel only in wings)
The EMB-145LR has a wet center wing box. (fuel in wings and center body)
The EMB-145XR has a wet center body and an added fuel tank built into the aft wing to body fairing.
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
FriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4003 posts, RR: 6 Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 849 times:
The ERJ-145LR I believe stands for Long Range. The 145LR that you see in ORD comes from CLE more than likely as I believe the RJ's you would see that come from IAH would be the XR's although I could be mistaken. The 145LR is pretty much used system wide except for the long haul RJ routes.
Well, I know they fly both non-winglet and winglet, and what I said was an LR I actually meant as an XR (I forgot about that one lol). I saw a CO 145 with winglets take off while I was sitting in the Ted Shed (a.k.a. the banana, or that little extension on T1, Concourse B housing gates B19, B20, B21, B22).
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 431 posts, 
, 934 posts, 
From Russia, joined Mar 2004, 2957 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
