BCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 15 Posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2257 times:
A few weeks back Ryanair and BAA were in dispute over landing charges at Stansted with BAA threatening to issue a writ unless Ryanair coughed up with the unpaid fees. There was talk from Ryanair of pulling out of Stansted and new routes were announced from Luton but since then I have heard nothing further and I have not seen anything more in the news. Was the dispute settled? Who was the winner or were there concessions from both sides?
[Edited 2004-09-01 10:44:01]
MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
Teva From France, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 1876 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2191 times:
I didn't know about this one, but I have seen some articles recently about the construction of a new runway in STN.
Ryanair opposes any increase in the airport fees to finance the runway.
That means the only option for BAA would be to increase the fees in LHR and Gatwick...
In other words, O'leary wants BA and other major airlines to finance HIS runway at STN.... And after that, call the same airlines paying for him the "high fare" airlines.
Of course, all the operators of the major London airports oppse this change.
Maybe the dispute you mention is an episode of this battle
Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
Trent900 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 542 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2174 times:
I think they're still battling this out. SGO, who is a handling agent at Stansted currently deal with the Buzz contract, will be moving to Luton early next year I've heard. They have approx. 30 flights a day. Swissport whom I work for deal with the main contract at Stansted and we have about 130 flights a day. If Ryanair did decide to move from Stansted, where would they go??
LHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2146 times:
Ryanair have already announced that further expansion of their London services will be at LTN, supposedly due to a lack of slots at STN - is it really that full up? However, I don't think you'll see them moving their entire operation. LTN would be unable to support it and Ryanair are very well established at STN, Satellite 3 was built exclusively for them. Also STN's proposed second runway which has been endorsed by the government is an incentive for Ryanair, who were very positive about the decision at the time. I agree that they should be prepared to help fund it by paying the increased fees at STN.
Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
BestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7439 posts, RR: 57
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2141 times:
Ryanair's profitable at such low fares because it doesnt pay market price for anything.
IF BAA expect FR to pay market price, expect them to look elsewhere for growth opportunities. Southend and Luton come to mind, and perhaps Cambridge airports may divide FR's capacity between them.
I have a feeling that FR needs STN, and BAA know that. realistically FR cant exit stansted completely, but wont give up without a fight. They have done similar things at DUB, MAN, BHX and LBA, and in some cases the airport capitulates. In others (MAN) the airline gives in.