Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ryanair And BAA Dispute Over Stansted  
User currently offlineBCAL From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 3384 posts, RR: 16
Posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

A few weeks back Ryanair and BAA were in dispute over landing charges at Stansted with BAA threatening to issue a writ unless Ryanair coughed up with the unpaid fees. There was talk from Ryanair of pulling out of Stansted and new routes were announced from Luton but since then I have heard nothing further and I have not seen anything more in the news. Was the dispute settled? Who was the winner or were there concessions from both sides?



[Edited 2004-09-01 10:44:01]


MOL on SRB's latest attack at BA: "It's like a little Chihuahua barking at a dying Labrador. Nobody cares."
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWGW2707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1197 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2107 times:

Ha! Typical Ryanair! They're loaded with cash but refuse to pay landing fees at one of their major hubs. Unbelievable corporate behavior...

-WGW2707


User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1872 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2098 times:

I didn't know about this one, but I have seen some articles recently about the construction of a new runway in STN.
Ryanair opposes any increase in the airport fees to finance the runway.
That means the only option for BAA would be to increase the fees in LHR and Gatwick...
In other words, O'leary wants BA and other major airlines to finance HIS runway at STN.... And after that, call the same airlines paying for him the "high fare" airlines.
Of course, all the operators of the major London airports oppse this change.
Maybe the dispute you mention is an episode of this battle
Teva



Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineTrent900 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2081 times:

Hi all,

I think they're still battling this out. SGO, who is a handling agent at Stansted currently deal with the Buzz contract, will be moving to Luton early next year I've heard. They have approx. 30 flights a day. Swissport whom I work for deal with the main contract at Stansted and we have about 130 flights a day. If Ryanair did decide to move from Stansted, where would they go??


By the why, its STANSTED not STANSTEAD.

Trent.


User currently offlineMikedlayer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2074 times:

I don't think Luton would be able to handle the Ryanair fleet if it were to move over from Stansted, it would have too many other charter airlines and easyJet's using the gates.

Why don't Ryanair just cough up the cash? They obviously have it they make enough profit don't they? (I wonder how many people take up their flights for 1p offer? lol)

Mike


User currently offlineLHR27C From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 1279 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

Ryanair have already announced that further expansion of their London services will be at LTN, supposedly due to a lack of slots at STN - is it really that full up? However, I don't think you'll see them moving their entire operation. LTN would be unable to support it and Ryanair are very well established at STN, Satellite 3 was built exclusively for them. Also STN's proposed second runway which has been endorsed by the government is an incentive for Ryanair, who were very positive about the decision at the time. I agree that they should be prepared to help fund it by paying the increased fees at STN.


Once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned forever skyward
User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7152 posts, RR: 57
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2048 times:

Ryanair's profitable at such low fares because it doesnt pay market price for anything.

IF BAA expect FR to pay market price, expect them to look elsewhere for growth opportunities. Southend and Luton come to mind, and perhaps Cambridge airports may divide FR's capacity between them.

I have a feeling that FR needs STN, and BAA know that. realistically FR cant exit stansted completely, but wont give up without a fight. They have done similar things at DUB, MAN, BHX and LBA, and in some cases the airport capitulates. In others (MAN) the airline gives in.

STN... who knows!



The world is really getting smaller these days
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BAA & Star End Dispute Over LHR posted Sat Jan 29 2005 06:31:09 by Scotron11
Ryanair And Marrakesh posted Mon Nov 20 2006 07:30:47 by Madairdrie
WTO Dispute Over Launch Aid Renewed. posted Thu Nov 16 2006 01:41:22 by Curmudgeon
Why Did OasisHongKong Choose Gatwick Over Stansted posted Sat Oct 21 2006 16:38:50 by 8herveg
Ryanair And Tornado: Dangerous Close Encounter posted Fri Oct 20 2006 19:08:40 by Boeing777/747
Ryanair And Morocco Clinch Deal... posted Thu May 25 2006 13:25:12 by Beaucaire
Big Ryanair And Excel Airways Delays @ NCL posted Mon May 15 2006 15:07:03 by Gkirk
Ryanair And Its Cheap Flights posted Sun Apr 23 2006 16:39:48 by Tony Lu
Ryanair And Its HHN Base - The Future posted Fri Apr 21 2006 23:36:59 by Pe@rson
AI And EK @ BHX Over Last 24hrs posted Mon Apr 10 2006 14:24:05 by Thomsonfly