Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA 777 Gone To Greener Pastures?  
User currently offlineLimaFoxTango From Antigua and Barbuda, joined Jun 2004, 771 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8979 times:

Someone please tell me that this big fella for UA is just going for a repaint and not something else. The reason i ask is that GYR seems to be a place where aircraft are sent to be stored or scrapped. I wouldnt like to see this 777 taken from the skies soo quickly...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jeremy Irish/Cactus Wings




You are said to be a good pilot when your take-off's equal your landings.
33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8830 times:

You can tell that she is not getting a re-paint as she is all covered up.

Many UAL 744s and 777s are stored in the desert. Some re-joined the UAL fleet, some are with other airlines, and some are still in the desert. For more information on the planes, do a search.

It will be a long time before you see a 777 broken up.

-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineSabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8826 times:

Don't be scared, this T7 will not be scrapped  Big grin

Just put in storage.

Frederic


User currently offlineLimaFoxTango From Antigua and Barbuda, joined Jun 2004, 771 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8789 times:

Well i was just flipping through more pics from GYR and I notice quite a few 777's are there in storage. Any particular reason why they are being stored? Is it because UA is in hard times and probably cant afford to keep them in the air?


You are said to be a good pilot when your take-off's equal your landings.
User currently offlineIL76TD From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 289 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8763 times:

yea, pretty much, they own i believe all of their 744's, so even with the increased operating costs of using a 744 instead of a T7 it is still cheaper than the T7's operating lease payments.

I also believe they are trying to get the most use out of their 747's before retiring them, as the T7's will be around for a much longer time.


User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10358 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8660 times:

"I also believe they are trying to get the most use out of their 747's before retiring them, as the T7's will be around for a much longer time."

Not true, as some UA744s are newer than many 777s in the fleet. UA has, I believe, more 777s parked than 744s, at the moment. Several 744s have been returned to service, others have been sold, 5 or 6 are still parked.

Why nobody picks up the 777s would be a mystery to me, if I wouldn´t know how damn expensive this type is. Seems that they are too expensive for secondhand-buyers. Some are standing around for 2 years now!


User currently offlineLurch From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 8627 times:

Hi ive herd that 2 United 777s will be going on lease soon I think its to ETHIAD ive probably miss spelt their name.

But they are supposed to be N205UA/N206UA I think if I find out any more ill let you know its supposed to only be until they get there next batch of A330s


User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10358 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 8611 times:

Etihad? Hardly thinkable unless for a one- or two year lease-term as the airline seems to be clearly aimed at a 100% Airbus fleet after their massive order.

I read somewhere Varig might take exactly these two aircraft you mentioned.


User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4264 posts, RR: 34
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 8576 times:

It's also a matter of the leasing corporation/bank who actually owns the aircraft that they don't want to spoil the market... the same reason why you see top notch offices and appartments in the centre of expensive cities staying empty for years...
Let's say the typical lease rate of a 777 is $ 1 mln a month. United tells the bank/leasing company "hey, from now on we only want to pay $ 800.000, if you don't like it, you can collect your 777." If the leasing company agrees with only receiving 800.000, they have a short term better cash flow but then they will have a hard time to ever lease it or other 777s out again for $ 1 mln if the market pulls up. So they rather gamble that after a while United gives in when they really need the aircraft again or another carrier desperately wants them.



nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineRamerinianair From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 8511 times:

It is my understanding that when an A/C is due for a huge maintenance overhall, they choose that A/C for parking. It was stated that the 744s that UA has are all owned. They do operate 2 that aren't owned but rather leased from Wells Fargo Bank Northwest and State Street Bank and Trust. Thoose two are among the older 744s so I think they would of opted to store them first. If anybody can confirm that, their registrations are N171UA and N105UA. They still aren't all that old delivered in 89 and 94.
SR



W N = my Worst Nightmare!!!!!
User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 8470 times:

I don't believe UAL has any 747's in storage. The pictures you are looking at are probably from earlier this year, things have changed since then. The 777's that are stored are stored for the reason above, the leasing company wouldn't come down on the price. So my guess is, soon as the lease expires they will return them to the lesser.


UAL 777 CONTRAIL


User currently offlineSCRAMJET From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 99 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8412 times:

I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make more sense to store a paid-for plane that's less cost-efficient than storing one in the desert, unused, but still being paid for?

User currently offlineGaleaocumbica From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8379 times:

Hi,

I heard that RG will take 2 parked UA T7's.

But I don't know how true is that!

Cheers

GaleaoCumbica


User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8361 times:

UAL 777 Contrail,

Don't know where you got your info, but UA currently has 37 744 in storage and 8 777 in storage at Victorville among other fields. Check out www.airfleets.net to get up to date info on stored, retired, or new planes ordered by any carrier.

Regards,
AA777jr


User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8345 times:

one more thing,,,talked to my older brother who is a currier with FedEx Air and he said that UA has sold or is currently leasing alot of thier 37 B747 in storage. Not all will be at the storage facilities.

Regards,
AA777jr


User currently offlineStarrion From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1122 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8314 times:

37 744's in storage? I don't think so.

At the height they had 15 in storage.

Are you sure you aren't counting older -200's or ther types?



Knowledge Replaces Fear
User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8281 times:

I meant to say 747, not the 400 series alone, the second post I left, corrected, sorry.

AA777jr


User currently offlineSafetyDude From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3795 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 8086 times:

I don't believe UAL has any 747's in storage.

Here is the exact link for stored UAL 747s: http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/index.php?file=flottecies&opp=United%20Airlines&app=b747

The 37 747s includes all variants of the 747. UAL has either 9 or 10 744s in storage according to Air Fleets. I saw them with my very own eyes in July.

As far as UAL 744 and 777 rumors go, I have heard that Corsair and NWA are looking at the 744s, and RG is looking at 777s. A few people have mentioned Aero Mexico looking at UAL 777s, but that seems to be more of a wish than reality.

-Will



"She Flew For What We Stand For"
User currently offlineUltrapig From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 580 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 7758 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ignoring capital costs-on a flight of at least 5 hours-which is cheaper to operate per hour 777 or 747?

Which is cheaper per seat mile?

Does anyone know how the lease rates differ on these two for used aircraft?

Why wouldn't an airlines with peak summer demand like ELAL simply lease some of these planes if they are otherwise sitting empty-are T7 with similar engines configure similarly so that an airline can have slightly different models with the same pilots?


User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2908 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 7477 times:

With UA announcing additional service to Asia, those 744s & 777s in storage will be coming out or some 744s or 777s due to heavy overhaul will replace those that are in storage.

Either way I just hope UA gets its act together. I can't wait to see what the 744s look in the new scheme. I have only seen one and the only 777 to date and it looks pretty good.


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 911 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 7421 times:

Why wouldn't an airlines with peak summer demand like ELAL simply lease some of these planes if they are otherwise sitting empty-are T7 with similar engines configure similarly so that an airline can have slightly different models with the same pilots?

El Al 772ERs have the Trent 800 engines not the PW4000 on these birds, also the UA birds are 772 A-market, which lacks the flexibility of the 772ER that many carriers require. Engine compatibility can be a bitch for anything longer than a short-term lease, one of the reasons Boeing is integrating a common pylon on the 7E7.

I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make more sense to store a paid-for plane that's less cost-efficient than storing one in the desert, unused, but still being paid for?

Actually (I think) both 744 and 772ER are leased, with the 744 at lower rates.


User currently offlineUnitedTristar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6812 times:

I know for a fact that UA only has 4 744's still in the desert. The 777's that are in the desert are leased aircraft that will be returned soon and are due for heavy maintence. So pulling the 744's out of the desert and doing the heavy maintence on them now, as they need it as well, as opposed to having to do the 777 then returning them and then having to do the heavy maintence on the 744...It just makes since to only have to do the overhaul on only one jumbo....not two. The ORD PVG route is soon going to a 744 next year as planned and the SFO PEK is going to a 747 and SFO CAN is going to be operated by a 744 so pulling the remaining 4 out of the desert makes since. Two were just recently re-entered into service. I will check with my friend at UA to see if I can get the N numbers on the remaining desert Queens.

-m

 Big thumbs up


User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3196 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5458 times:

Ignoring capital costs-on a flight of at least 5 hours-which is cheaper to operate per hour 777 or 747?

Which is cheaper per seat mile?



Why would you ignore them?

This represents one of the three biggest costs of operating an aircraft so it is important. To anwer the question, the 744 has the lowest seat mile costs on long haul routes. But the big difference is, say, UA has to pay an extra 20% in fuel burn. Lets say fuel is 20% of this airline's expenses. That converts to around an extra 3-4% in total operating costs. Now if you don't have to make lease payments, well, even though one would claim depreciation, that isn't cash flow. Which means it is on paper and doesnt have to be found (as you paid already when you purchased the aircraft).
Hence the NW DC-9s still flying. A few dollars more in fuel but a lot less in leases.


User currently offlineJfkaua From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1000 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5372 times:

ahh the font color strains your eyes..

User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2686 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5093 times:

The 744s may be cheaper to operate than the 777s, but in the long run they will wear down. The 777s are far too new, far too fuel-efficient, and far too advanced to be scrapped right now. N790UA can't be more than like 6 or 7 years old. The Triple Seven could last well up to 40 years in active service I would think.


Fly one thing; Fly it well
25 Dkny : ET were talking about leasing 2 T7's from United? Anyone heard anything on that?
26 Sdkualeb : OK Here is my list, there are 11 747 that appear to still be in VCV, 3 which show to be in storage, nose numbers are 8106,90,92. 8 are showing to be s
27 Na : "The Triple Seven could last well up to 40 years in active service I would think." No way. I bet that a 777 will be as economical compared to newer co
28 Rwylie77 : Thrust - just because they are in the desert does not mean they are going to be scrapped!!! They are only being stored there before being returned to
29 BestWestern : Doesn't UA have to do a D-Check prior to the aircraft being returned to lessor?
30 Lurch : Hi my info on the 2 UA 777s got jumbled with some other information and ive sorted it out those two UA 777s are due to go to Varig some time soon with
31 Mlsrar : also the UA birds are 772 A-market, Um, no. At least 7-of them are ERs my friend.
32 N1120a : If NWA does buy any UA aircraft, they should probably start with N106UA, it is a 747-451. At least some of the A/C in storage are going to Corsair, bu
33 Hz747300 : Aren't all of NWAC's 744s leased? I thought that was the difference between UA and NW.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA 777--What To Expect posted Tue Sep 27 2005 20:19:38 by WindowSeat757
UA 777 Diverted To BOS - Any Explanation posted Sat Sep 3 2005 02:53:24 by Reggaebird
UA 744 (NC) And UA 777-Star To LAX Anyone? posted Wed Jan 26 2005 01:34:18 by BN747
Did U Know UA 777 Fly To Osaka From HNL? posted Sun Mar 7 2004 19:23:50 by Big777jet
UA 777 Diversion To RFD posted Tue Sep 30 2003 22:40:35 by UAL Bagsmasher
UA 777 Diverts To GRR posted Sun Dec 29 2002 05:06:33 by UAL Bagsmasher
UA 777 Returns To FRA After Nav Failed posted Fri Jun 22 2001 17:06:17 by AKE0404AR
UA 777 Diverts To Boston posted Sun Oct 29 2000 03:24:42 by LH423
UA 777 To Honolulu posted Thu Feb 9 2006 05:45:20 by Flybynight
UA 777 To Acadiana Airport posted Thu Jan 6 2005 08:43:16 by Sfo212