Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is Silk Air So Damn Expensive?  
User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 5823 times:

SIN-CEB (Cebu Mactan, Philippines) is $1,800S on Silk Air for a RT flight in mid-Jan. Whereas, SQ is under $700S for SIN-MNL also for mid-Jan. Such a huge price difference for destinations so close to each other (MNL and CEB).

Silk Air has always been high on fares. Am I the only one who thinks this?


Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4755 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5737 times:

Silk Air and SQ has never been known for their low fares until the emergence of LCCs recently. On routes where there is little competition, prices can rocket sky high! Even for their "low fares", there are so many restrictions I can't even begin to count.

Think abt this, on routes to Manila and Cebu, the only operators are Philippine Airlines and SIA (well, until recently, Qatar to CEB). Unfortunately, PAL does not have a good reputation in Singapore and SQ knows that. So, they know by charging such fares, people will still fly them (SQ)! Simple as that.

U should have seen back in the early 90s when Philippines severed ties with Singapore for a brief moment, and cancelled alll PAL flights to Singapore. SIA jacked up the prices twice the normal amount! Let's not forget in Sept 98 when PAL ceased ops, no need to tell you what did SIA do to the prices of tickets to Manila!



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5703 times:

Oh yes, I remember when PAL ceased to serve SIN as well as PAL's loss of operations completely. I saw fares (at least when I was inquiring) upwards of $2000S SIN-MNL.

However now, PAL charges a little under $600S and SQ $630S for SIN-MNL. So they are pretty comparable.

Yet Silk Air charges double that to CEB! I certainly hope Qatar gives Silk some competition.




Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineGuyBetsy1 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 840 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5596 times:

Hi... what website did you look at? SILKAIR.com?

One word of advice... don't!

Travel mid Jan from SIN to CEB on SILKAIR can be had for S$383 return, and QATAR Airways is charging S$310 return. These can be purchased through travel agents in Singapore.

Even the local agents are only charging S$815 return for a full fare economy Y class ticket. So I have no idea where Silkair.com comes up with their version of fares!

[Edited 2004-09-02 13:23:34]

[Edited 2004-09-02 13:24:42]

User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4504 posts, RR: 72
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5514 times:

Silk Air's fares are eventually bound to come down as more and more of their routes are being shared with the new LCCs in the region. Tiger Airways will soon be competing with Silk Air on the Singapore-Phuket and Singapore-Hat Yai routes, and prices will come down dramatically. It is hoped that Tiger, and also Valuair, will open more routes competing with the likes of MI.

For those routes with limited or no competition, it has been my experience that certain travel agents in Singapore can offer you the best deals.



User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5419 times:

You know what? For some reason I completely forgot about travel agents in Singapore. It didn't occur to me to inquire with them.




Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineDebonair From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 2428 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5406 times:

Hi, Sorry!

Tiger Airways will soon be competing with Silk Air on the Singapore-Phuket and Singapore-Hat Yai routes

I think I am out of the loop. I was thinking both companies were belonging to SINGAPORE AIRLINES! so why competition??  Confused


User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4755 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5390 times:

Tiger Airways and Silkair are 2 very different carriers. The former is a hard core LCC, no doubt about it. The latter is one confused sandwich.

Silkair, I reckon, will soon function as an airline that connects other international passengers in Singapore through Terminal 2 as their ops are meshed together with SQ's.

Tiger, operates out of Terminal 1, will be a separate airline altogether.

As far as Temasek Holdings (SQ's owner) is concerned, LCCs are coming whether you like it or not. Rather than letting SQ/MI lose money to the foreign LCCs, why not create one themselves and let them compete? If SQ/MI were to lose money, the coins will still fall into Temasek's coffers via Tiger.

That is why u will still find Tiger and Silkair flying some similar routes and singing the same mantra (serving destinations within 4 hours from Singapore).



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5326 times:

From my point of view operating both Tiger and Silk on the same routes is not the best idea.
From my armchair position I would position Silkair as an short-haul feeder for SQ beside the trunk routes to BKK, KUL etc. And it should be with an reduced service, something like NZ is doing domestically and Trans-Tasman.
Tiger could then operate as a full lcc the leisure routes to Krabi or Phuket and maybe also the SQ trunk routes on which Silkair doesn't operate.


User currently offlineAsianguy767 From Singapore, joined Oct 2003, 263 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5208 times:

SQ ticket prices vary from the 3 daily flights they hv into MNL whereas MI has only 1 daily to CEB i believe. so the $700 return could be of a least favourable timed flight

User currently offlineKl808 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5151 times:

MI Doesn't have competition on the SIN-CEB-DVO-SIN route therefore can charge high prices.

MS also charges high prices on the Kota kinabalu-CEB-Kota kinabalu route.

drew



AMS-LAX-MNL
User currently offlineGuyBetsy1 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 840 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5112 times:

Sorry, KI808, that kind of explanation doesn't gel especially as far as savvy and prudent Singaporeans are concerned. The website may say something.. but in all honesty, Singaporean travellers won't be going that route if they can help it.

Local travel agents are selling SILKAIR SIN-CEB return for as low as S$383 return. Slightly higher prices are only about S$50 more.

No one in their right mind will buy and pay over S$1000 for such a short route.


User currently offlineAsianguy767 From Singapore, joined Oct 2003, 263 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4932 times:

perhaps the price on MI's website is for tickets valid more than 6 mths whereas the travel agent's are quoting 'excursion' tickets valid for less than 90days?

User currently offlineKim777fan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 510 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4906 times:

When I saw the title for this thread, I though someone was buying a tie at Nordstrum, not buying $1800 airline tickets!! Big grin And here I thought CO was expensive!! Yeesh!!

User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4730 times:

No one in their right mind will buy and pay over S$1000 for such a short route.

... especially if it's a leisure route. CEB is not known to be a high-flyin hustling bustling city. In fact it's a getaway hence one of the reasons why it's a Silk Air concentration. THAT is the reason I am so baffled by these outrageous fares.



Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is Midwest Express So Expensive? posted Mon Jan 20 2003 01:50:01 by DeltaRules
Why Is This Flight So Expensive? posted Tue Jun 25 2002 04:59:19 by GD727
Why Is Denver's Runway So Long? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 00:28:23 by Fll2993
Why Is Toronto ATC So Bad? posted Thu May 18 2006 18:31:51 by Naritaflyer
Why Is NWA Parking So Many Aircraft? posted Thu Mar 2 2006 02:12:25 by Flywithjohn
Why Is The UK So Popular For Aircraft Maintenance posted Fri May 13 2005 14:46:00 by R3500vdp
Why Is Airbus Being So Silent? posted Mon Apr 11 2005 18:58:06 by Gokmengs
Why Is This Pic So Popular? posted Wed Apr 6 2005 05:42:32 by QANTASforever
Why Is HP Regarded So Badly? posted Sun Mar 20 2005 06:12:29 by Boeing73G
SAS - Always So Damn Expensive? posted Thu Mar 10 2005 12:16:17 by Gkirk