Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Just Out Of Interest...  
User currently offlineCool Cat IIIc From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 722 times:

Just out of interest I would like to know why there is so much animated discussion going on about Boeing vs Airbus, and especially the subsidies that either side does or does not get when there is another issue regarding subsidies going on; it's between Bombardier and Embraer regarding alleged illegal subsidies for their respective regional jets. This is much more tangible and less open to speculation yet it is never even mentioned over here. Surely this couldn't be because there is no US manufacturer involved ?

Another interesting thing, why is that there are no US built regional jets (with such a large marked) and very few US built modern turboprops ? I can only think of the Beech 1900D really. All the others are either built in Canada, Brazil or Europe. Anybody know why the US industry apparently isn't very interested in the regional airline marked ?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDash8 From New Zealand, joined Aug 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 721 times:

I think because they'll get their a**es kicked. Also I didn't know anything about this Bombardier/Embraer affair. Probably because the Boeing/Airbus saga steals the spotlight.
Could you tell us all what is going around with those 2?


User currently offlineNYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 12 hours ago) and read 722 times:

Has the WTO (world trade organization) ruled on this yet?


Fly Lance UFO to the WTO to the OSCE!!!

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29800 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 11 hours ago) and read 721 times:

I haven't heard of the RJ thing either.

I think that one of the reasons is that Donier at one point was losing $50,000 dollers on every 328, that is was makeing. I can't remember where a saw that number though so don't rely on it.

There are only two companies that I know of that would be in a position two build an RJ, Gulfstream and Raytheon(Beech). Gulfstream would be the obvious choice since they allready build simular sized aircraft and there G-1C conversion was sold as a regional prop. Raython makes the Beech family and smaller jets. I don't think any of these companies want to leave their core bizjet market. But a long range G-V derived RJ would be an interesting aircraft.

User currently offlineCool Cat IIIc From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 8 hours ago) and read 722 times:

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has just ruled against Brazil's Proex programme. This is an interest-rate equalisation programme designed to offset higher financing costs for customers buying Brazilian products. Bombardier has said that this programme has reduced the price of the EMB-135/145 considerably.

They have a point of course, however I feel sorry for Embraer. I like Embraer and how they have grown from a relatively unknown company to a company making first-class planes. It seems to me that had they been a Canadian company (for instance) they wouldn't have needed the Proex programme because the finance charges for Canada aren't as high as for Brasil. So it's really no fault of their own. (I know very little about all of this economic stuff, so if I'm talking non-sense I'm sure somebody will be kind enough to clear things up).
Then again, you can't really blame Canadair for coming up for their rights either. I just think that Brazil could use some support in these areas, especially with the current economic crisis over there.

The WTO has also ruled against Canada by the way. It ruled against the Technology Partnership Programme (TPC) because repayment is conditional on export succes. I have no idea what all this means quite frankly but the idea I get is that these two rulings are a considerably bigger blow for Embraer than for Canadair.

Perhaps some of the Brazilian forum users can expand on this a bit ?

User currently offlineWhite Knuckles From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 6 months 8 hours ago) and read 721 times:

The first line of Dash8's response reminds me why I rarely post in this forum. Idiotic drivel like this advertises your low IQ like a blaring horn in a quiet neighborhood.

The barriers to entry into the aviation industry are the highest in the manufacturing sector. It is only natural for govt's to defray these stupefying costs by providing subsidies. Having a world class manufacturer of commercial jets is a matter of national pride. Do you think Europe was dying to get Airbus off the ground for the great returns on investment? Of course not, Its a matter of pride. The US is moving away from a manufacturing based economy to a service based economy because this is where the returns are. Let's face it, even after 50 years, Boeing is lucky to get a 5% return from top-line revenue. It takes four separate companies to produce 3 aircraft lines for Airbus. If you're an investor, this is one of the least attractive industries in the market. And still no competitor from Asia. I could stare at jets for the rest of my life and never get bored, but Dash8 please pick up the red clue phone. Its been ringing loudly in your house for a while now.

User currently offlineAntonov From Croatia, joined Jun 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 6 months 7 hours ago) and read 723 times:

White Knuckles wrote:
The first line of Dash8's response reminds me why I rarely post in this forum. Idiotic drivel like this advertises your low IQ like a blaring horn in a quiet neighborhood.

Dear White,

Sometimes I wish that I could state things (in English) as wonderful as you do.
These two lines of yours sounded like music into my ears.
Please stay in this forum to say what I sometimes think but cannot write down like you do, because I am not a native English speaker ! We need more like you !

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29800 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (15 years 6 months 5 hours ago) and read 721 times:

It is comments that you quoting the first line of Dash8 response and then firing shots at him that bring this site down and ruin it for everybody.

Didn't you pay any attention to the earlier comments about Will leaving the site. It is comments like that that make people leave.

Get of the (Explative Deleted) put down boat. You should really look at the content of your postings. You really should.

User currently offlineBrazil From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (15 years 6 months 3 hours ago) and read 722 times:

Cool Cat is right in his post. I think that the big issue is that Embraer was starting to steal a substancial market share from Bombardier, that triggered this whole affair.

The ERJ-145 is not only cheaper then the RJ, but also more economical to operate.....it's a good, reliable plane. A recent accident with a Rio-Sul 145 in Curitiba, where the plane almost splited in half due to a very rough landing, showed that the ERJ is a good, safe plane. With the data analised, the investigators were amazed how little damage the plane took, with that landing, this accident was supposed to be a disaster.

User currently offlineYmq From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 722 times:

The WTO ruling stated that Bombardier receuved a total of 3.5M$ in illegal subsidies. The brazilian Proex program reduced the price of each jet by 3 to 4M$. Cool Cat IIIc wrote that the interest rates being higher in Brazil, the program was not that bad. He's right. HOWEVER, when Continental airlines buys jets, they don't finance them in BRazil but in the US, with US interest rates. So the Proex program was really worth a lot to all non-brazilian Embrear customers.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will Southwest Go Out Of Just The Continental US? posted Fri Jul 25 2003 00:27:33 by Chicago757
New Continental 777-200 Out Of Factory posted Thu Feb 22 2007 20:54:19 by AlitaliaMD11
Martin JRM-3 Mars - Phased Out Of Service? posted Thu Feb 22 2007 19:03:13 by Chuchoteur
AC Out Of New Dehli posted Fri Feb 16 2007 21:11:54 by Awschucksflyer
Strange Piedmont Flights Out Of BTV (ROA, MHT) posted Wed Feb 14 2007 13:11:30 by UN_B732
DCA Closed Due To "Out Of Chemicals" - UPDATE posted Wed Feb 14 2007 06:56:14 by ScarletHarlot
Delta Adds 5 New Routes Out Of Atlanta posted Tue Feb 13 2007 21:13:20 by Jimyvr
TG - Cheap Fares Out Of Australia - Desperate? posted Mon Feb 5 2007 11:23:27 by Sparklehorse12
Haulin' Out Of ATL Today.. Nice Airbone Winds. posted Sat Feb 3 2007 19:25:37 by UN_B732
Bird Strike Hits TAM Flight Out Of LDB posted Mon Jan 29 2007 21:43:20 by Krist0f
WN To Seek More Expansion Out Of DEN? posted Tue Mar 18 2014 23:05:33 by point2point
Etihad Regional Pulls Out Of Cambridge posted Fri Mar 14 2014 00:56:27 by 2008matt
Virgin America To Pull Out Of SJC posted Thu Mar 13 2014 21:22:38 by SocalApproach
Skywest To Fly For American Eagle Out Of ORD posted Mon Mar 3 2014 15:02:03 by realsim
Delta/JFK International Passengers Walk Out Of T4 posted Wed Feb 26 2014 05:50:30 by jfklganyc
How Is Alaska Airlines' Performance Out Of SLC? posted Sun Feb 23 2014 19:16:27 by ryanrap1
Airfreight Service Out Of DAL? posted Sat Feb 8 2014 13:41:08 by dfwjim1
Malaysia Airlines To Operate Out Of DWC posted Tue Feb 4 2014 21:29:17 by AlitaliaDC10