Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Did Aloha Ditch Their -300's?  
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 47
Posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2693 times:

Aloha acquired a small fleet of 737-300's (and possibly even a -400 or two) some time ago. But they ditched them and stayed with all of the -200's, which I would think after all the free publicity they got involving that little oopsy-daisy with #711, they would've ditched them as fast as possible.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Brian Peters



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Je89 W.
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © AirNikon



5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5873 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2662 times:

My understanding is that the CFM-56 engines do not hold up well under Aloha's unusual schedule. That is, modern high-bypass engines are generally designed for longer sectors, and Aloha is flying 20 minutes flights. That's very hard on any engine. Maintenance costs became outrageous very quickly.

The JT8-D used on the -200 is the PERFECT engine for these short flights- it doesn't mind the stress.

The only modern airplane that can deal with those stresses of short flights is being used by Aloha's competitor- the Boeing 717.

R


User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2637 times:

AQ found that their very short routes was too much for the CFM engines on the -300s and -400s, and found that the engines were not designed for routes as short as AQ's, and actually increased their maintenance costs.

Talking with cabin and flight crews, they enjoyed the -300s and -400s while they were in the AQ fleet, but the bottom line was $$$.

The dilema now is finding a suitable replacement for the -200s. The simplest solution to deal with the noise issue, is hush-kits, which AQ has not installed, even with the exemption that expired last year (gotten by Hawaii's Congressional delegation in the 90s). Various a/c types have been speculated for the past several years, including the 717-200(!?!). AQ is mum on this topic, and will keep their cards close.



"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16307 posts, RR: 56
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2626 times:

I read on here some time ago that AQ has ruled out the 717 as a 732 replacement simply because HA operates the type. If true, this seems self-defeating to me if the 717 is indeed the best solution.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineAzoresLover From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 757 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2603 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would HOPE that is not true, as the 717 would be perfect, as has been pointed out here. Being a 717 fan myself, I'd hate to see an order lost for such a reason!!


Those who want to do something will find a way; those who don't will find an excuse.
User currently offlineAloha73g From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2365 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2571 times:

The main reason the 717 is out of the running is beacuse Aloha has a HUGE cargo operation currently served by 737-200QCs. The 717 does not have cargo capability and they wish to keep fleet types to a minimum (so no 717 for pax and 732s for cargo). Plus, the 732s are real workhorses and are for the time being very easy to acquire on the used aircraft market. The 732s are here to stay for quite a few more years under my estimation.

Also, the interisland market is unprofitable or barely break even for both AQ and HA, so why dump precious money into a money loser? AQ has it right, spend your $$$ on something profitable....73Gs on trans-pac flights  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Aloha!



Aloha Airlines - The Spirit Moves Us. Gone but NEVER Forgotten. Aloha, A Hui Hou!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Did NWA Ditch Their MD-80s? posted Thu Dec 26 2002 23:13:42 by Dan-air
Why Did Virgin Drop Their Signature Tail Design posted Wed Nov 22 2006 12:01:26 by 777way
Why Did Am Change Their Livery? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 20:37:40 by ATLFlyer323
Why Did AA Sack Their 747s? posted Thu Oct 7 2004 14:21:05 by Corpsnerd09
Why Did SQ Supersize Their Logo On A345? posted Sat Jun 12 2004 21:20:28 by SQ452
Why Did CO Change Their Meatball From Black To Red posted Thu Jan 29 2004 02:54:41 by Ramprat74
Why Did MH Change Their SYD Flights? posted Tue Nov 25 2003 05:19:43 by Nickofatlanta
Why Did Aloha Flying ONT-FAT Today? posted Fri Oct 25 2002 05:06:40 by Big777jet
Why Did Delta Shrink Their Hubs? posted Wed Feb 6 2002 19:50:55 by ORD
Why Did Swissair Retire Their B 743s So Early? posted Mon Jun 11 2001 16:23:10 by United Airline