Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Range Of Reduced Seat/cargo A380, Kangarou?  
User currently offlineKEESJE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 2482 times:

What would be the range if a carrier wants to provide a premium product Europe - SYD/MEL by focussing on the 350 best paying passengers a day.

SQ has reduced seating capasity on it's A350's drastically to fly to the US. Walking around options, more legroom & a wider economy seat and bars / badrooms etc. would be neccesary anyway on such long flights...

Do the weight savings of leaving out ~ 200 people & some cargo make it possible to fly Europe-Australia directly (& back) ?

Or the other way around, how much people/cargo have to be cut to make it technically possible.



Could Airbus place some extra fuel tanks in the A380 cargo hold ? (as they did with the A319LR etc..)

Any A380 payload/range graphs around ?



11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17180 posts, RR: 66
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 2465 times:

That would probably be technically viable, but would it be economically viable.

There are graphs on the Airbus Website. Dig a little for the PDFs.

I'm pretty sure Europe-Perth is already possible.

The Mad Nitpicker strikes: It's spelled "kangaroo".




"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 2464 times:

I think are aussie mates are going to want you to use spell check:

"kangaroo"


User currently offlineGeoffm From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2111 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2361 times:

"I think are aussie mates are going to want you to use spell check:"

I think one ought to check one's own sentence before criticising others!

"I think OUR Aussie mates are going to want you to use spell check:"
 Wink/being sarcastic

Geoff M.


User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2301 times:

If Branson would equip some of his A380´s to do so, I suppose he wouldn´t make friends with BA & Qantas...

I cannot find weight pay-load figures, range is 8000nm with 555 passengers, but with reduced payload? Can´t find it..


User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 859 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2261 times:

IMO I dont think Sir Branson cares what BA & Qantas says about the payload and fueltanks in Virgin´s 388  Big grin

Micke/SE Big grin



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6543 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

200 pax less = 20 tons less payload = potentially 20 tons more fuel = probably some 800nm more range because the plane is very light when those 20 tons fuel finally have to be burned.

800nm is a wild guess, but it will be between 500 and 1000nm.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

Geoffm:

I did that intentionally to make a point!!

sorry you didn't get it.

dtwclipper


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2166 times:

I cannot find weight pay-load figures, range is 8000nm with 555 passengers, but with reduced payload? Can´t find it..

My browser totally freaked out trying to open this file, but here you go. I'm really starting to hate the .pdf format-

http://www.content.airbusworld.com/SITES/Technical_Data/docs/AC/DATA_CONSULT/AC_A380.pdf

See page 64

200 pax less = 20 tons less payload = potentially 20 tons more fuel = probably some 800nm more range because the plane is very light when those 20 tons fuel finally have to be burned.

When you say SYD/MEL to Europe, I assume you are figuring that these routes would be to LHR? I don't see anyone using the A380 for long-thin premium service... so it would have to be a big-ticket market. I assume LHR would be the biggest of these...

LHR-SYD = 9,188 nm
LHR-MEL = 9,127 nm

Also figure in about 450 nm worth of reserve fuel and another 450 to fight head-winds.. and you need almost a full 10,000 nm worth of range to fly these routes. Judging by the .pdf, this would be a very meager payload of 20 tons, versus a 95 ton payload for an 8000nm flight.

That's nearly a 75% payload reduction. The amenities on board such a flight could be borderline rediculous... but I assume highly uneconomical. I would think it would be in the best interest of airlines like QF to begin opperating A388 on SYD-SIN/BKK-LHR and run non-stop premium services with a smaller B/C-market aircraft like the A345, 7E7-8/9, or 777-200LR

****

Major correction- I rechecked the payload/range Z-chart and I no longer believe LHR-SYD/MEL is possible. The figure I quouted above was for the A380F.... for a passenger A380 to fly 9500+nm, there would be less than a 10 ton payload...

[Edited 2004-09-15 00:32:59]

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17180 posts, RR: 66
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2152 times:

My browser totally freaked out trying to open this file, but here you go. I'm really starting to hate the .pdf format-

Right-click and "Save Target As..." to save the file, then open in Acrobat. Opening large Acrobat files in your browser involves a lot of Voodoo caching algorithms mostly designed for reading from top to bottom. Slowly. As you have noticed if you jump around the performance is crap and the browser feels locked up (although it is not).



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineKEESJE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2054 times:

thnx for the information,

interesting link with lots of A380 information

it makes it clear modifications would be neccesary to fly these routes

with a reasonable payload



User currently offlineGeoffm From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2111 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2051 times:

Dtwclipper, yeah right!

Geoff M.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Range Of Prices For The Same Seat... posted Mon Feb 5 2001 00:44:30 by TWA902fly
Range Of TG A345 & A346 posted Fri Nov 24 2006 00:12:10 by QantasA380
SIA Unveils H1 Profit Of US$553.4M + A380 Delivery posted Fri Oct 27 2006 11:12:35 by Singapore_Air
The Real Villain: Out Of Position Work On A380 posted Mon Jul 24 2006 22:04:06 by Dougloid
Age Range Of AA's Mad Dog's? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 05:09:09 by Radelow
Decreasing Numbers Of 50 Seat Jets posted Thu Dec 29 2005 02:00:48 by Flyf15
What Is The 'Economic Range' Of The A330-300 posted Fri Dec 16 2005 00:07:02 by Boysteve
Ryanair: Availability Of Free Seat Offer By Route posted Tue Sep 20 2005 15:41:10 by Pe@rson
ANC Cargo A380 posted Tue Jun 7 2005 10:00:51 by Bushpilot
Effect Of Airports And The A380/747ADV Success posted Fri Apr 29 2005 20:43:28 by JAM747