Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Continental To China 2005/2006  
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5153 posts, RR: 8
Posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4434 times:

Continental follows suit (DL to PEK) with proposed service from EWR to Shanghai and Beijing.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040922/daw032_1.html


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16810 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4344 times:

"Continental requests permission to inaugurate service to Beijing in the spring of 2005 and to Shanghai in the spring of 2006, subject to government approval."

Im surprised that they picked Beijing to be the first route, I would have thought they would have gone with Shanghai first since there is no existing nonstop flight from the NYC area to Shanghai. Beijing gets a nonstop flight from JFK 4Xs weekly nonstop via Air China.

I think CO's application is very strong, especially with their EWR hub from which both routes are to operate. They would create competition on the NY-Beijing flight against a Chinese airline and they would be establishing a totally new route to Shanghai from the NYC area.

The two other airlines (AA, DL) applications I feel are not as strong as CO's, AA's application for ORD-PVG would have them competition against UAL on the ORD-Shanghai route . The Governments would rather have a US and Chinese carrier competing against each other than two US or two Chinese carriers competition on the same route.

DL I feel is the long shot since their application is the most complicated because of issues with DL's current health, the length of the route and obvious prominence (business wise) flights to the NYC and Chicago areas would have over the Southeast.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2686 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4324 times:

It's great that CO wants to start service to China...but with what aircraft? The 777s they don't have?

On a separate note, I really think that it's a long shot for DL to get ATL-China. After all, how much demand is there for flights from ATL to China? You can argue that there is demand for connections, but except for people in Florida (that could go to EWR anyway), who's going to fly down to ATL just to backtrack to China?

Also, how long will it be before the airlines find out if their requests have been granted?

[Edited 2004-09-22 23:25:26]

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16810 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4310 times:

CO has one or two outstanding options with Boeing for 777s, how fast they can be excersised Im not sure.

There's always they leasing option, perhaps there might be a couple of GE90 Powered 777-200s available.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineNWA Man From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1828 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4308 times:

It's great that CO wants to start service to China...


Word on the street is that CO already flies between EWR and HKG...






Create your own luck.
User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2686 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4292 times:

Okay, NWA Man, I guess you're right. However, I don't really consider HKG to be part of China proper (even though it may be).

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4746 posts, RR: 43
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4247 times:

NWA MAN...there is no word on the street...CO has been flying nonstop EWR-HKG for 2-3 years now with B 772ERs.

Yes CO would do very well from flying EWR-PEK/PVG nonstop because of the number of connections it can offer via its mega EWR hub.

CO should also look into applying to fly a IAH-CHINA flight either to PEK or PVG to cater for the traffic in the US Southern and Central areas such as DFW-IAH-SAN-PHX-LAS-New Orleans-STL etc.

DLs flights from ATL to China will have not even 10% O&D traffic bound for ATL...a vast majority obviously will be transitting passengers unless ofcourse youre a CNN or COCA COLA company employee working in ATL  Big grin

DL would be wiser codesharing with CO or NWA to China...preferably with CO as NWA can in anycase manage on its own to CHINA as its an established airline there with a good reputation to USA.

As for where CO will get extra B 777s for these China routes...well to begin with, they need a total of 4 more B 777s for daily PEK flights and another 3-4 for daily PVG flights from EWR!!! So yes it does raise an interesting question...where will these extra B 772ERs come from?

Are COs B 777s the same as UALs or DLs??? If so then they can lease or purchase the unused B 772ERs of theirs.


User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4146 times:

CO has 18 777s right now. The utilization is horrid on the HKG route (12 or so hours on the ground in HKG) More utilization could also be found to TLV.

It only takes 2 aircraft to fly to HKG. remember that the planes rotate through the system, to just fly EWR-HKG on the current schedule would thake 3 planes, but the EWR-HKG plane arrives from Europe, and the HKG-EWR plane leaves for Europe.

There is no way for either of the routes to use more than 2 planes.

CO Has 2 paid for yet to be exercized options on 777 so those could be delivered by 2005, and an order could be placed to recieve 2 more in 2006.

EWR-India has also been thrown around, plus all of the expansion into europe, dont be surprized when CO orders 15 or so 767s and 777s from Boeing.



There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineKim777fan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 510 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4131 times:

"After all, how much demand is there for flights from ATL to China?"

This isn't your great-grandfather's Atlanta. We're now talking about one of the premiere financial centers in North America. It still isn't a New York, but who is???

"DL would be wiser codesharing with CO or NWA to China"

I'm sure that's going to happen anyway, regardless of how DL's application turns out.


User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4357 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4030 times:

Just curious, where do you see that CAL has options for 2 more triples?


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3983 times:

The origional 777 order was for 16 firm and 18 options, and the origional 764 order was for 26 firm and 10 options. After shufling things around with Boeing CO has 2 paid for 777s that they have not set a delivery date for, plus a bunch of 777 and 767 (any series) options. They may even have some firm 767s without a delivery date set. They havenot been totaly thrilled with the economics of the 764, hence the conversion of the 2 orders to 777s. Bethune used to be an executive with Boeing and CO has signed and exclusitivity contract with Boeing, so it was easier to make the conversions between the types.


There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineCorey07850 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2525 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3946 times:

I actually posted this info (without cities proposed) on sunday... amazing what information a.net provides...

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1746312/6/


User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4357 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3857 times:

CO2BGR

Was looking for something more up to date than that, I know what the original orders were, but, as you mention those have all been changed.

Not sure where you get your info that CAL is 'unhappy with the economics of the 764' but I can assure you that is not the case.I have flown the aircraft since it was originally delivered to us,to Europe, South America, and across the
Pacific as far as Tokyo.

When it was first delivered there were many occasions when we flew a leg substituting a DC10 and I was able to compare directly,fuel burn/payload
performance and can tell you the mprovement on just, for example the Sao-Paulo Ewr run was close to 50,000 lbs less fuel burnt.

Do you have anything more current on the status of options?



The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3778 times:

The problem with the 764s to europe the BizFirst to coach ratio and the number of BizFirst seats compared to the 777s. The costs were less than the 10s but they were selling out the BizFirst cabin on the 764s. The problem comes in the structural configuration of the aircraft, specifcly the 2nd exit doors. They would have loved to have 8 rows of BizFirst in there with 2 less coach rows. My dad is a CO 756 FO and has also been on the equipment since the before the 767s came online, and that is what I had discused with him when they were getting the 767s at the time. Management's views may have changed since then. This was back when they were discusing getting 763s as well.


As for the 2 paid for 777 options, it was mentioned by another CO employee in another thread discussing more CO expansion roumors. I will try to find it and reference it.




There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3731 times:

AA should be in PEK soon.

AA777jr


User currently offlineAanalyst From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3713 times:

AA should be in PEK soon.

Make that PVG. AA announced today that we're submitting our application for ORD-PVG with a tentative start date of May 2005.



Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. - Study Hard, Be Evil
User currently offlineUa777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3706 times:

Are COs B 777s the same as UALs or DLs??? If so then they can lease or purchase the unused B 772ERs of theirs.

CO's 777's are GE 90-90B (90,000lb's) powered
UA's 777's I THINK are PW 4090 (90,000lb's) powered
DL's 777's are RR 892's (90,000lb's) powered

So there are 2 different engines. I thought the same. I know that CO is an airline that trys to have aircraft familiarity and with the addition of a new engine type that means more training and other issues that would just make it harder but if they want/need it that bad then that's what needs to be done.

They are in dire need for widebody a/c. US might be getting rid of a few 762's as is DL. There are many AC 767's in the desert. If they want these 777 to be freed up a bit this might be the way to go. The only issue is that these a/c have passed hands so many times and are extremely old.

The other thing to do would be follow through with what orders they have left with Boeing. AA too has a few 777's on order that they don't want yet. DL says their keeping their orders....... So many options.

Thanks again.

UA777222

Can anyone tell me what the UA powerplants are? I know they're P&W but what option?

*******Everything stated above is MY OPINION and do not reflect the opinion(s) of Contiental Airlines or any of their affiliates *******



"It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark."
User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3702 times:

Sorry to disapoint you two AA fans, but DL, AA, And CO have submitted aplications to to compete for 7 weekly flights between the US and China. Only of the three will be flying to China next year.

[Edited 2004-09-23 05:44:04]


There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineAanalyst From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3682 times:

I'm not dissapointed CO2BGR, I know that AA has submitted apps to fly to China many, many times in the 6 years I've been with them. I don't have my hopes up.

I just hope that this time they don't award the additional slots to either UA or NW, which seems to be a pattern lately.



Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. - Study Hard, Be Evil
User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3668 times:

Yes it would be very nice to see some new metal into China rather than connect in NRT. Sorry if I offended you but it seemed that between yours and AA777jr that you guys thought it was a done deal.


There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineAa767400 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2332 posts, RR: 26
Reply 20, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3668 times:

CO2BGR, I am sorry to disappoint you? How do you know that AA, or DL for that matter, will not be getting the slots? How do you know that CO, will be the one getting these slots? Do you have some kind of inside to this, that others don't? Because most likely you don't. And your statement makes no sense what so ever.  Insane


"The low fares airline."
User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3653 times:

AA767400: That statement was made towad AA777jr and Aanalyst. No I do not have any inside information, but based on their comments combined It seemed like they thought it was a done deal and AA was flying ORD-PVG, when in fact they are competing for the slots.

Edit: In that post I wrote I am sorry to dissapoint you TWO AA fans, TWO being the keyword refering to AA777jr amd Aanalyst.

[Edited 2004-09-23 06:10:43]


There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineN830MH From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 3304 times:

Always to need active with the link < > and here it is:

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040922/daw032_1.html

This is smart move for DL and now CO is going to PEK & PVG, too. It will receiving with more the 777 aircraft on their way.


User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5153 posts, RR: 8
Reply 23, posted (9 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 3262 times:

More than likely--Continental will temporarily downgrade some flights to free up 777s until more come online--if they are granted the route authority.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineCOEWRNJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1064 posts, RR: 19
Reply 24, posted (9 years 10 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2898 times:

Does anyone know when the first of these route authorities are to be awarded?

25 CO2BGR : COEWRNJ: The first award will be for spring of 2005.
26 CALMSP : i highly doubt we will downgrade flights..........what would we downgrade? these will be new aircraft.......the only ther option is to take away maybe
27 Ramerinianair : CO has a record with downgrading some flights to be able to start new service. They generally do not use their widebodies on domestic flights but they
28 Drerx7 : Those 764s (76H or 767) with smaller J/F cabins are for their Pacific ops--as they do not sell as many B/F seats.
29 Ramerinianair : I know they call the smalle f/j cabined 764s hawaii configured. When they need more, they just add f/j seats to the rest of the front cabin. "The prob
30 DfwRevolution : Can anyone tell me what the UA powerplants are? I know they're P&W but what option? The first 777-222A were PW 4077, the latter 777-222ER are PW 4090
31 Airzim : Larry Kellner stated in an employee meeting (that I was admittedly not at) that even if CO wanted to acquire new widebody aircraft they could not secu
32 Chinaeastern : well, not surprising DL and CO applied PEK first, as they are both in skyteam and CZ has much more extensive network out of PEK than PVG and even the
33 Jfklganyc : I didn't know that DL applied for flights to ATL. As for CO--don't bet on it! DL applied for a JFK flight to China a few years back and it was rejecte
34 Drerx7 : Exactly--and it only efficiently serves the southeast/carribbean transfer passengers. IMO--It seems that an application from Texas to China (AA/CO) wo
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Continental To Budapest In 2006? posted Sun Oct 16 2005 17:35:15 by HunUtazo
Continental To Bournemouth 2006? posted Sat Oct 15 2005 22:16:40 by BmiBaby737
Continental To Open EWR-CPH - From May 2006 posted Thu Sep 29 2005 11:29:23 by SAS767
Continental To Make Money In 2006? posted Mon Apr 11 2005 17:36:02 by CLE757
AA: MIA-MAN To Resume In 2005/2006 posted Wed Dec 22 2004 21:43:58 by MAH4546
Continental Airlines Returning To China posted Fri Jun 20 2003 09:13:48 by Airmale
A380 To Fly To China In November posted Wed Nov 1 2006 17:46:19 by PlaneHunter
B777F's To China posted Mon Oct 16 2006 21:20:31 by Justloveplanes
Continental To Post 3rd Qtr Profit posted Wed Oct 11 2006 19:23:35 by CLE757
Race To China..... posted Sun Oct 1 2006 04:32:28 by JamesJimlb