Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A380 In Spain.  
User currently offlineMADtoCAE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5629 times:

Do you think that Spain could handle the A380?If you do, what airport and airline would operate the plane?

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArniepie From Belgium, joined Aug 2005, 1265 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5519 times:

I don't know,... maybe MAD-Tenerife or one of the other Islands.
Just a best guess



[edit post]
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5509 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I've no doubt Spain will eventually be able to handle A380's, Spain is after all a partner in Airbus. MAD and BCN are obvious candidates for A380 service, can't see other Spanish airports receiving A380 flights from anywhere. As for which airline might want the A380, naturally Iberia comes to mind, but at the moment i don't think IB needs or wants that kind of capacity. It could be a potential future customer, but only for a handful of core routes to South America from Spain.



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineArniepie From Belgium, joined Aug 2005, 1265 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5443 times:

Now I think of it, maybe it would not be a bad Idea to operate some kind of LCC with the A380 between the Vacation-Island's and Heathrow/Frankfurt/
Amsterdam because a lot of western Europeans have a 2nd house or code-sharing arrangement on 1 of these Islands.
-Baleares
-Canary-islands
Certainly when you know that a lot of these places have only 1 Runway(slot-restriction), have good weather almost all year round (Canary-Islands) and people would certainly book more long weekends if the prices for flying where consistently low enough (only a 4 or 5 hour flight anyway).



[edit post]
User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7582 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5416 times:

If the construction work going on in MEX at the moment includes the construction of a couple of gates that can accomodate the A380, I am sure that IB will seriously consider using an A380 for the MAD-MEX route.


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineRj111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5273 times:

Perhaps in the future

MAD-MIA
MAD-MEX
MAD-GRU
MAD-EZE
MAD-GIG

could support an A380 service.


User currently offlineACES320 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 393 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5249 times:

RJ 111

I would add MAD - BOG to the list. Currently IB is only allowed to operate a daily flight on this route due to bilateral agreements in both countries. Sometimes IB has required the 747-200 on the route to cope with demand. If eventually they become monopoly in the route an A380 would be more than justified on it.




LHR, BHX, EDI, BKK, USM, CNX, PHU, GRU,PEI, BOG, CTG, CPH, AMS, DOH, DXB, FRA, MAD and always PEI
User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8380 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5162 times:

You won't see MAD-MIA 'cause Iberia no longer has a hub in MIA.
You might see MAD-HAV if they do decide to put their hub in HAV.


User currently offlineAstrojet From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 565 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5052 times:

As others said here, I would guess for MAD - EZE as they are some daily widebody flights, and it looks there is plenty demand for that route.

User currently offlineEZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4967 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5041 times:

I also would think MAD-EZE as the first choice. What about MAD-SCL? demand in that route is not as high as EZE, but it's still quite high


Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
User currently offlineAM744 From Mexico, joined Jun 2001, 1779 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 12 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4995 times:

Based on current demand MAD-EZE, MAD-MEX and MAD-MIA in that order, could produce A380 traffic as of today.

User currently offlineAnxebla From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 12 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3287 times:

Airbus CEO in Spain said last April that IB could to reach an agreement with BA to use 2/3 A-380's in a future order of A-380 by BA

User currently offline767-332ER From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2030 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (9 years 12 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2775 times:


I think that you will see probably 2 A380's being operated in Spain, as it has been stated above, the CEO of IB had announced the possible source for obtaining these a/c, whether on lease part of the year...whatever the perameters of the logistics may be, I believe that MAD-MEX and possibly MAD-EZE would be the only routes that might support them. The high capacity routes to the Canaries will be suficed with the 744's.
Regards



Twinjets...if one fails, work the other one twice as hard!!!
User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3488 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (9 years 12 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2721 times:


Airports like PMI,LPA and TFS should be ready to handle the A380. By the way, has any German charter airline announced interest on the A380 ?


User currently offline757MDE From Colombia, joined Sep 2004, 1753 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (9 years 12 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2104 times:

I would add MAD - BOG to the list. Currently IB is only allowed to operate a daily flight on this route due to bilateral agreements in both countries. Sometimes IB has required the 747-200 on the route to cope with demand. If eventually they become monopoly in the route an A380 would be more than justified on it.


I hope they never become a monopoly in that route!.
Although yes, given that condition I think they'd be enough demand for an A380, the big question now is:

Can BOG handle it?



I gladly accept donations to pay for flight hours! This thing draws man...
User currently offlineSOUTHAMERICA From Colombia, joined Dec 2003, 2497 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (9 years 12 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2025 times:

You might see MAD-HAV if they do decide to put their hub in HAV.

I think HAV (which by the way is not going to be put as hub) is a strong candidate for the A380 even if IB does not start intra-american services from there.

---------------------------

I hope they never become a monopoly in that route!.

It wouldn't be that easy anyway. The local authorities wouldn't let them.

Can BOG handle it?

The runways can, not sure about the terminal thought. Maybe the external gates, such as C7 (the one that IB currently uses) and C8 can do it.


SOUTHAMERICA


User currently offline757MDE From Colombia, joined Sep 2004, 1753 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (9 years 12 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1986 times:

It wouldn't be that easy anyway. The local authorities wouldn't let them.


The authorities wouldn't allow it, but I think it's guessing that Avianca for any reason stops servicing that route, if Avianca, for its own means and will, stops servicing it then there's nothing the authorities can do (in theory BOG - LHR, or well, BOG - CCS - LHR for current matters would also have to be served a Colombian carrier...but the truth is other, nothing the authorities can do because the Colombian carrier, for any reasons, just doesn't serve that route any more by their own means and will) . Of course, it's a very fantastic scenario... Avianca deja de ir a Madrid cuando los sapos bailen flamenco.

BTW how did the Air Madrid issue end? (if it has ended yet)

The runways can, not sure about the terminal thought. Maybe the external gates, such as C7 (the one that IB currently uses) and C8 can do it.

That's what I was asking, the terminal itself... because I know the space is quite narrow between gates (even MSFS makes me suffer that hehe).




I gladly accept donations to pay for flight hours! This thing draws man...
User currently offlineACES320 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 393 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (9 years 12 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1932 times:

If AV goes bankrupt or something like the Brazilian finding a new "strategy for the business" the AV could go out the route and IB could become monopoly. And there is nothing the Colombian goverment can do about it.

About the gates, it is posible for the A380 to use remote gates for boarding?



LHR, BHX, EDI, BKK, USM, CNX, PHU, GRU,PEI, BOG, CTG, CPH, AMS, DOH, DXB, FRA, MAD and always PEI
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A380 In Spain. posted Fri Sep 24 2004 17:08:14 by MADtoCAE
A380 In JNB posted Sun Nov 26 2006 08:53:28 by A390
A380 In Sydney posted Sun Nov 26 2006 06:57:59 by Peh
ETA Of A380 In Johannesburg? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 09:25:43 by Voyager
Building An A380 In 7 Minutes posted Sun Nov 19 2006 18:12:41 by BR076
A380 In Hong Kong (Pics And Videos) posted Sun Nov 19 2006 17:27:33 by CX773
A380 In Incheon Pics posted Wed Nov 15 2006 13:54:27 by KE086
A380 In Johannesburg On 26 Nov 2006 posted Thu Nov 9 2006 14:56:32 by Voyager
Iraqi Airways Will Register In Spain posted Tue Oct 17 2006 17:23:29 by AirMalta
Singapore Airlines Will Receive The A380 In Oct 07 posted Tue Oct 3 2006 19:52:33 by Singapore_Air