Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F9 Throwing In The Towel At LAX  
User currently offlineKlwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 1977 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7659 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The following article says it all:

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/business/article/0,1299,DRMN_4_3208477,00.html

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7540 times:

You know, to look at your topic line you'd think that F9 is ceasing all LAX service...

They're only dropping LAX-STL.... LAX-DEN will continue...


User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7499 times:

"They're only dropping LAX-STL.... LAX-DEN will continue..."

The whole point is that F9 was running other routes out of LAX rather than just to their hub... I agree that it could have been worded better, though.



Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlineJetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2937 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7489 times:

At least they're keeping their LAX-MCI, DEN, and PHL services...

Too bad for STL and MSP. STL will still have the low fares from WN, but MSP has no LCC for the route.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineNoise From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1735 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7461 times:

How is American West doing in LAX these days? I know LAX is a focus city for America West as well...are they suffering from the same problems as Frontier?

User currently offlineKlwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 1977 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7438 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Point taken.

Of course F9 is not and will not cease DEN-LAX. That would be proposterous. I just used the catchy wording from the story's headline. After the initial excitement and fanfare, it doesn't look promising for the F9 LAX focus city. Pulling routes here and there, one at a time.

That is all.


User currently offlineClrd2go From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 7329 times:

America West!! America (no "n") West!


What a long strange trip it's been
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 7332 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As usual, there is more to things than a headline.

Frontier had planned to use the smaller A318 on both LAX/STL and LAX/MCI for the slower months.

But the 7th A318 - N807FR - was damaged during a test flight at Finkenwerder and one engine is a write off. Since spare CFM's are not thick on the ground, there is gong to be a delay in delivery - there is a thread about this.

This means that Frontier is short an aircraft for a couple of months, so they bit the bullet on LAX/STL (the 318 will take over LAX/MCI from October 10).

On the other hand, DEN/BNA gos to the A319 (instead of the A318) for about six weeks in November.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineInnocuousFox From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2805 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 7299 times:

One of those 2 LAX-PHL flights is obviously a red-eye/repositioning flight. That's not much of a presence there.


Dave Mark - Intrinsic Algorithm - Reducing the world to mathematical equations!
User currently offlineFlaps From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1227 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 7145 times:

Bring on DEN-PIT with newly freed a/c.....Pleeeeeeaaaaaasssssseeeee!!!!!!!!

User currently offlineAAplatnumflier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6580 times:

The problem with Frontier is that they don't advertise. The average flier would not know the difference between them or Joe Shmoe Airline. Also the average traveler would not even know anything about it. I was taxiing for takeoff the other day at LAX and somebody a row across said I wonder what that airline is. The animals are cool on the tail. Just thought I would share my opinion.

User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6496 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"The problem with Frontier is that they don't advertise..."

Well, maybe. But if that's true it would be system wide, and it wouldn't explain why (for example) DEN/ANC or PHL or DCA or BNA do so well, or many others.

Or anything to Cancun, including SLC/CUN.

And there are the tv commercials, which, I think, counts as advertising.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineAAplatnumflier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6456 times:

Their presence in Denver is so big. How could you not know who they are? In L.A. they had a short advertiseing run and that was that. It got me to fly them. I loved it. But i still think they have to somehow make their presnece in L.A. bigger. I dont mean by adding flights I just mean they need their name to be out there to the average flier.

User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 13, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6326 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"How could you not know who they are?"

Interesting. The reason they started the tv commercials is because they discovered that, in Denver, a lot of people didn't know why they are (this is about two years ago).

As far as LA is concerned, I think there have to be other reasons. PHL/LAX did well from the git-go, so I guess they got their name to the PHL pax.

The other odd thing is that the concentration has all been on LAX. What they've been doing at CUN has gone almost unnoticed.

CUN is now, effectively, a focus city for them, with more destinations than LAX had.

The Frontier cabin crews even joke about it: "On behalf of your Cancun based crew...."

In their dreams, of course, but the CEO has said that if Cancun continues this way, they will have to consider a crew base there. He might have been joking, too.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineAirplaneBoy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 548 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6311 times:

Hi everyone...

I agree with AAplatnumflier. We really do need to advertise more in the outstations.

Mariner- I agree with you as well. Some of our new markets are doing quite well. Do you think it's perhaps that select outstations received more advertising or better time slots (t.v.)/better deals on print rates? In L.A., the advertising stopped just after only a few comercials that aired during late evening and on channels that aren't widely watched.

Although I'm sad to see our LAX station get smaller, I can't always say I wish we had LAX- ___ , etc. etc. --- even though I'll keep wishing and crossing my fingers. Big grin

I hope that as our fleet grows, that the tails will find some happy new routes to make money on- especially until we get more gate space in DEN.

I'm sure that we can definitely expect more flights in the coming months however as the holiday season and spring are right around the corner.

Cheers!

Travis/LAX


User currently offlineUAMAYBACH1239 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 221 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 6269 times:

I would say they dont advertise as much in Los Angeles. In DEN of course their presence is known, but only 2hrs away its the complete opposite.


a/c flown 737-222/322/522 757/747-1-2-4, 767-2-3, 777-2-3, A319-20, DC10-10-30, L1011-3-5, 727-222adv, MD85-90 flyourfri
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 16, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6163 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

AirplaneBoy:

I have a problem with the advertising thing. People seem to know about LAX/PHL, and, at least during the summer months, about LAX/STL and LAX/MCI.

I think - I don't know - that LAX was all about LAX/MSP. I suspect that Frontier was ready for retaliation on LAX/MSP, but they weren't expecting NWA to start DEN/LAX, one of the breand and butter routes.

Since DEN/LAX had to be protected, LAX/MSP had to go.

But I was interested that even until yesterday LAX/STL was still in the website booking - as the A318, not the A319. It was to change o October 10, the same day as LAX/MCI goes to the A318.

Clearly, the delay of N807FR is a problem.

Right now, it's a whole other ball game. Frontier first warned about the cost of fuel when oil was at about $35 a barrel. Now it is $49 a barrel.

So I get the impression that Frontier has sensibly battened down the hatches until the present storm passes.

But who knows? The CEO has said "no new routes this year" but the Rockford (Chicago) press seems convinced that Frontier is coming to them.

http://www.rrstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040924/NEWS0107/40924003

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineLtbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 12881 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5712 times:

I bet very few people know of them flying into LGA, as they have no ads for them here in the NYC area. Probably they don't as they have only a few flights into LGA, do not serve EWR and don't expect to get much return for the investment in ads to get through the clutter. They don't even have ads (as they did in the past) nationwide on cable/satallite news and entertainment stations. I really only know of them servicing LGA from a DIA-LGA flight in 1999 I bought online via Travelocity.

User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6412 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 5585 times:

Besides the before-mentioned 318, it looks like a new 319 delivery will have to be pushed back as well thanks to another incident in Germany. I don't have many more details than that. Look for some minor (but still unfortunate) frequency reuctions to a couple of major markets in mid December.


Next trip: MSY-SEA-GEG-SEA-LWS-BOI-PDX-SEA-LAS on AS
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 19, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 5345 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

MSYtristar:

Wouldn't you love to be a fly on the wall at the negotiations between Frontier and Airbus over this?

cheers

mariner

ps: I like your choice for President.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineUAL747DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2392 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 5064 times:

I think that F9 is showing that they are a great airline by cutting service like they have. Most airlines wouldn't cut service just because of the PR, however F9 is constantly evaluating weather the service is profitable or not, if they see any where else that they could use that aircraft they will pull it. We have seen that some other airlines will not do this, they will actually cut prices and operate full flights that go out without making a dime just to keep some sort of pride.
As for F9 not adding any additional routes this year, that is mostly a computer problem. They are in the process of switching the res. system and adding a new city at this point would be a mess, however if they see a big potential I can assure you they will take it.



/// UNITED AIRLINES
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 21, posted (9 years 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 4883 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

UAL747DEN:

No new routes this year was a policy decision. Frontier has warned at the beginning of the year about the price of oil, and when oil started to go through the roof, together with what they saw as a general over-capacity, they decided to batten down the hatches.

This is all part of your post - the willingness to reduce service, etc.

Now, about two weeks after they said "no new cities this year", they announced LIT - so any policy can change.

But RFD? I don't know. I don't know enough about it.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineAirplaneBoy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 548 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4806 times:

Mariner-

I agree. Remember when LIT was announced? Many of us were surprised because Potter usually does what he says he's going to do. As previously discussed, the opportunities for going into LIT at that time outweighed the negatives.

Where is RFD?

After hearing about LIT, I wouldn't be shocked to hear about another new station.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Warm Regards,

Travis/LAX


User currently offlineUAL747DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2392 posts, RR: 12
Reply 23, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4780 times:

Mariner,
I got my information on that from the Aug 9th edition of "The Loop". Here is what it says:

Rumor: Frontier's next new destination, to be announced soon, will be. . . Montego Bay, Jamaica

Reality: The latest in a long and prestigious list of rumored "next destinations" we are sad to say that Montego Bay, while certainly an appealing tropical locale, is not in our immediate plans. In fact, not only are we not beginning flights to Jamaica any time soon, but it is unlikely we will add any more cities prior to the completion of the Sabre installation next year, in an effort to create a smooth transition. While its not exactly Jamaica (in fact, it might be the anti-Jamaica), service is still scheduled to begin to Little Rock on Oct. 10, but that will mark the end of new city additions prior to the Sabre transition.


Never thought about this until now but to add to the AA/F9 merger dream! The fact that F9 dropped SHARES, costing them great penalties to go to Sabre in the middle of the purchase would help that argument. (I know this is not likely!)



/// UNITED AIRLINES
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24641 posts, RR: 86
Reply 24, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4725 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

UAL747DEN:

I'm going by what the CEO told the shareholders at the AGM. He said no new cities/no new routes in Fiscal '05.

Mind you, he's hard to keep pace with sometimes.

He started the Jamaica rumors at the December '03 press conference when he said they were in discussions with "a Caribbean island", but probably not for that ('03) winter.

The AA/F9 merger dream? I would say the nightmare. Look what AA has done to every other airline it has acquired.

AirplaneBoy:

RFD is Rockford outside of Chicago. See the link I posted in reply #16.

RFD is a severely under-used airport that sees itself as an alternative to ORD.

They were able to entice Trans-Meridien there last year, and they are now on an all out push to get (a) NWA (b) Frontier and (c) Hooters - I kid you not.

They are offering a guarantee against loss and no landing fees for the first 12 months.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
25 Ifly2eat : "but MSP has no LCC for the route." So ATA has been forgotten that easy JetBlueFan?
26 SHUPirate1 : Worth noting, if this hasn't changed, is that UA has quite a few route authorities from RFD, including to much of Europe, the Middle East, and several
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing: Throwing In The Towel? posted Tue Jul 9 2002 11:32:43 by Solnabo
Altitude Of Jets At In-out Park At LAX posted Thu Nov 30 2006 00:53:35 by 747srule
Biggest Plane In The World At RDU-now? posted Fri Oct 27 2006 23:41:05 by Fbm3rd
Daddy Longlegs In The Window At FL370 (Photo) posted Tue Oct 24 2006 21:45:48 by SimProgrammer
Astreus A/c In The Circuit At EMA Last Night? posted Wed May 24 2006 03:34:48 by RobK
How Many In The Sky At Once? posted Thu Apr 6 2006 15:54:27 by Chuffy
FedEx Stuck In The Mud At CLT posted Thu Dec 15 2005 14:39:43 by ChiGB1973
No Power This Hour In The Tower At FLL posted Wed Nov 2 2005 01:41:17 by OPNLguy
Boeing 737-200 Ban In The UK At The End Of 2005 posted Wed May 18 2005 17:25:40 by SignalOne
USAir In The 80s At PHL posted Mon Nov 29 2004 21:03:01 by 7E72004