Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Emirates Increases Paris To 12 Per Week  
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4441 posts, RR: 43
Posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1849 times:

Source :

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data/business/2004/September/business_September612.xml§ion=business&col=

Emirates has been given the go-ahead by the French government to operate a second daily flight between Paris and Dubai starting from March 2006, the carrier announced yesterday.

The new flights will allow Emirates airline to increase its capacity on the Paris-Dubai link by 30 per cent from March 2005, and by an additional 10 percent from March 2006.

The airline’s current daily Paris-Dubai line, which is 72 per cent booked on average, is the second-most profitable service after its Dubai-London link. Sales on the Paris-Dubai connection have increased 24 per cent since January.

Emirates will initially increase CDG to 12 weekly flights from March 26th 05 and will probably use a 3 class A 330-200 for the 5 new weekly flights. EK currently flies a 3 class 303 seater B 777-200IGW on the nonstop daily DXB-CDG-DXB flight.

Im surprised that CDG is there 2nd most profitable route...I thought that DXB-BOM, DXB-SYD or DXB-HKG would be more profitable.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDTManiac From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 689 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1784 times:

Is 72 percent such a good load factor? What is the break even point for EK?

Frederik


Gig 'em Aggies!!!
User currently offlineKl911 From Ireland, joined Jul 2003, 4977 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

Frederik,

Don't forget the cargo. The load factor on longhaul flights isn't important as on shorthaul. Cargo can be very profitable.

KL911


" The European consumer would crawl naked over broken glass to get low fares." Michael O'Leary
User currently offlineDTManiac From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 689 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1760 times:

But why don't they let the frequencies as it is now and send a 747F to CDG 2 times a week. I must be even more profitable if cargo is such a decisive factor.

Frederik


Gig 'em Aggies!!!
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1701 times:

Correction to the release:they currently fly the B773 into CDG.

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4441 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1674 times:

On EKs website it says F-J-Y B 777

B 777 on EKs website refers to -200 series and not -300 series...but maybe they havent updated it and the -300 subsitutes on the route regularly.

Yes even I thought that 72% isnt that great to be considered EKs 2nd most profitable route but when I contacted Air France in India to ask them about this, their response was that :

"Behramjee the answer is in the number of high yield passengers they
have and the ratio with economy".



User currently offlineHB-IWC From Greece, joined Sep 2000, 4414 posts, RR: 76
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1546 times:

I'm quite suprised they were able to get a go-ahead of the French government for these extra frequencies, as Air France has no current plans to increase its DXB service, and extra rights into CDG are very often linked to reciprocal rights for Air France. MH, for example, has been trying for ages to secure additional rights into CDG, but, as AF has no flights into KUL, MH has met considerable diffuculties in obtaining extra frequencies.



User currently offlineTBCITDG From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 921 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1477 times:

I wonder why EK was given the authority to increase it's flights, yet QF was denied the rights to go daily.
Would people overlook flying with QF/AF from OZ to Paris via SIN, in return for a Dubai transit and more connections to CGD??


User currently offlineEmirates777 From Tanzania, joined Feb 2000, 655 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1447 times:

Emirates currently flies a B777-300 LD acft on the CDG route. Very occassionally its substituted with a B777-200ER LD.

From the end of October 2004, CDG will switch to a B777-200ER LD. The B773 will be used to LGW on the EK015/016 instead.

I think the reference to profitability is through their European network.

As part of this bilateral renegotiation, both Gulf Air and Etihad have been granted 3 additional weekly frequencies each from AUH.

Rgds
Emirates777

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qatar Increases India Flights To 51 Per Week posted Mon Nov 1 2004 12:07:21 by Behramjee
THAIs A345s To MXP 3 X Per Week! posted Thu Dec 29 2005 19:06:19 by Dennys
TAP Flights To Brazil Increased To 38 Per Week! posted Thu Oct 14 2004 16:58:43 by Hardiwv
Qatar Airways To Increase DOH-LHR To 11 Per Week posted Sat Feb 9 2002 07:38:12 by Qatar
Virgin Increases LHR-DEL Freq To 3 Per Week posted Fri Oct 24 2003 22:47:35 by Gamps
IB Increases MAD-GRU To 12 Weekly Nonstop posted Mon Sep 11 2006 10:24:31 by Hardiwv
AF Increases CDG-GRU To 12 Weekly Nov/06 posted Mon Feb 20 2006 15:04:15 by Hardiwv
Qatar AWs 6 Per Week To Athens? What The? posted Sat Apr 9 2005 08:30:11 by 6thfreedom
Qatar Increases Paris-CDG To 6 Weekly A 332s posted Fri Feb 20 2004 07:21:54 by Behramjee
CX Get 6 Flights Per Week To Beijing. posted Thu Jun 19 2003 03:00:26 by N754pr