The777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6301 posts, RR: 56 Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1472 times:
L/N 433 is N765AN (C/N 31480), L/N 445 is N766AN (C/N 32880)
Not sure about C/N for N763AN and N764AN but no L/N has been assigned to either. I'm also very curious why AA skipped N763AN and N764AN although these registrations are still reserved by AA for future use.
Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly...T5, CI, LX and LH 777s
RobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3942 posts, RR: 19 Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1301 times:
Please point out this 'attitude' ?
I asked a question, you replied with wrong (and further confusing) information, I then pointed out to you that I thought you were wrong as the official US register holds different information, you then agreed that the US register would be right and now you want some non-existant 'attitude' to be dropped?
Is this not because you've realised you've cocked up by not checking your facts first before opening your mouth and now feel stupid, especially as you run your own 777 website ???
If anyone can come forward with the CORRECT line numbers I'd be grateful, thanks.
BA747400 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 428 posts, RR: 3 Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1290 times:
"Your info is extremely confusing but thanks anyway.
Can anyone answer my question please?"
"The official FAA US Aircraft Register is my source, what's yours"
Theres your attitude RobK. The777man devoted his time to help you out with your question. If his findings were wrong or right, the point is he did his best. Maybe you didn’t mean to have an attitude, but it sure came across to me that way...even before the777man pointed it out. Perhaps you should reconsider the way you word things so there is no confusion.
RobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3942 posts, RR: 19 Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 month 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1257 times:
Well Mike & Lars,
It certainly was not my intention to 'come across' as you have received and if anyone offence was taken I do apologise.
The point I was trying to make was that the info I had, had come from the FAA USCAR which is usually correct, however I have noted errors in their records in the past, hence why I asked what Lars' sources were; for example, as editor of a website solely about the B777 he might have been able to physically confirm the c/n's of said aircraft perhaps.
It wasn't intended to come across as 'well the USCAR is ALWAYS right, so whatever your sources are, they're wrong', which I suspect is where the offence was taken.