Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
IAM Wins US Airways Airbus Arbitration  
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Posted (10 years 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2974 times:

IAM Wins US Airways Airbus Arbitration

October 1, 2004 - The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) today announced a major victory over US Airways in a year-long dispute over subcontracting heavy maintenance of the airline’s Airbus aircraft.

“The IAM more than a year ago told US Airways that our contract prohibited subcontracting this work,” said Robert Roach, Jr., IAM General Vice President of Transportation. “US Airways wasted countless dollars on attorneys to fight their employees, and is now financially liable to our members for their corporate arrogance. I urge US Airways to begin embracing their employees as valuable assets and listen to our ideas for addressing the substantial challenges facing the airline.”

US Airways began illegally subcontracting Airbus Heavy Maintenance Visits (HMV) to Singapore Technologies Mobile Aerospace Engineering located in Mobile, Alabama in October 2003. The IAM won an immediate injunction in Federal District Court halting the subcontracting, but the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on February 3, 2004 lifted the injunction. The Appeals Court ruled the dispute should be resolved through the System Board of Adjustment, which is the arbitration mechanism provided for in the IAM-US Airways contract. The three-member System Board is made up of one Union member, one company member and a neutral.

“The Airbus was acquired by the Company in October of 1998 and the Company was, or should have been, well aware of maintenance obligations, particularly with respect to HMV work,” says the System Board of Adjustment’s decision. “If the Company is now faced with a bona fide dilemma, it is one that could have been, and to a certain extent was, recognized early on, but never accommodated in bargaining. The Company is ordered to cease and desist in outsourcing Airbus HMV work.” ST Mobile Aerospace has completed twelve Airbus overhauls in violation of the IAM collective bargaining agreement.

The complete signed decision will be available at http://transportation.goiam.org when received from the arbitrator.

“This decision reaffirms 55 years of contract language,” said William O’Driscoll, President of IAM District 142. “US Airways illegally outsourced Airbus work just months after IAM members provided $1.5 billion in savings to rescue the airline and allow it to emerge from its first bankruptcy. US Airways’ actions severely damaged the labor-management relationship that is critical for the company’s success.”

The parties have been ordered to meet and discuss how affected employees will be made whole for losses caused by the airline’s flagrant contract violation.

“The IAM will use every legal venue necessary to enforce this award,” said Roach.


I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5555 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

...thus continuing a long tradition of aggressive and thuggish IAM action, immediately prior to (and fundamentally contributing to) an airline's demise.


...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2924 times:

The IAM deserved to win this. There was nothing thuggish about it, and the only party who was aggressive was US Airways.

Unfortunately for the IAM, they're not likely to get much out of it. Damages for the 12 aircraft already outsourced will be prepetition claims in US Airways' bankruptcy, and the IAM will not see a substantial amount of money for them. As part of their 1113(e) motion, US Airways is already seeking relief to be able to outsource the Airbus heavy maintenance even when not permitted to do so by the existing contract. US will surely go after the same relief (and possibly relief to outsource Boeing heavy maintenance) as part of any 1113(c) motion.



I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5555 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

A330, mea culpa, I admit I did not trouble myself to actually know what was going on factually. I reacted to prior IAM actions, hardly a fair standard.

Your ultimate analysis sounds spot-on, I fear.



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlineIL76TD From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 289 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2848 times:

good for them, they'll receive one more paycheck before ALL of them are unemployed.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NW May Get US Airways Airbus's posted Tue Sep 21 2004 02:53:59 by Burnsie28
IAM Appeals US Airways Mtc Outsourcing Decision posted Wed Feb 18 2004 01:14:15 by A330323X
US Airways Airbus Fleet. posted Sun Mar 9 2003 20:17:47 by Fuelhog
US Airways Airbus Options posted Thu Jul 6 2000 15:57:07 by Tupolev154B2
US Airways Airbus 330-300 To Be In PIT 04/05 posted Mon Apr 3 2000 14:13:19 by Airwaysdc9
US Airways Airbus 330-300 Delivery Schedule posted Thu Mar 9 2000 15:34:21 by Airwaysdc9
US Airways-Delta Merger Good For Airbus. posted Sun Nov 26 2006 12:41:37 by LHStarAlliance
FT:Airbus A350 Delay Could Affect US Airways posted Fri Oct 27 2006 12:53:32 by UALMMFlyer
US Airways Original Airbus Order - Pre 9/11. posted Mon Aug 28 2006 01:51:20 by Gilesdavies
US Airways Indifferent To Airbus's A350 Dilemma posted Mon Jun 5 2006 10:04:08 by Leelaw