Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A380 Photo.  
User currently offlineJbond From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6009 times:

Hi all,

I hold has thank all people who have me write about this photo and your enthusiasm for the A380. I cannot answer all but I am going very quickly to send of other photos the next days. Many thanks to all screeners too & A.Net.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © French Frogs AirSlides



for French Frogs AirSlides
Yann

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineA380900 From France, joined Dec 2003, 1106 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 5753 times:

Cool. Thanks a lot, this is the most fascinating thing happening to aviation since Concorde.

User currently offlineFFlyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 733 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 5720 times:

Looks...short and ugly. Not that it matters....

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 5608 times:

FFlyer, you had the choice to not say it, it mattered enough to you.  Smile

I can see how you came to that judgement, it is a scale thing. The fuselage is not circlular, it is elliptical; your mind expects a certain amount of asthetic appeal, the kind that comes with a circular fuselage. If the fuselage didn't have a second deck you wouldn't think that way. Technically, based on my interpretation of your apparent logic, a C-5A/An124 should be ugly and short as well, scale-wise. I am certain your opinion will vary somewhat if you have seen it from the top with a thinly-scaled fuselage. It should look normal, aside from the GIANT hang-glider wings.

Atleast all the undercarriage is there...that's a lot of undercarriage!

That thing is phat, b-otch!



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineQantaspower From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 516 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5535 times:

I agree it looks as ugly as hell ... it just does not look right ...it needs to be much longer

User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2470 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5497 times:

"Cool. Thanks a lot, this is the most fascinating thing happening to aviation since Concorde."

Perhaps, along with the 7E7, it is. But it's pretty sobering and perhaps sad that "the most fascinating things happening to aviation" these days are bread and butter transports whose main reason for being is to help bring up airlines' often lagging balance sheets. Though both are vastly more significant developments for mainstream air travel and fascinating in their own rights, trying to rank them solely in the category of fascinating against the likes of Concorde is a lost cause. The SST is a painful reminder that commercial aviation developers once strove for cutting edge performance, instead of merely improving carriers' bottom line. I know that wasn't realistic but the days when airline builders were focussed on flying people ever faster; trying to make that next big leap toward saving travelers ever more time-the pre-1970's developmental era; man, THAT's when the most fascinating things happened! Airliner development has lost that 'pushing the envelope' mantra that really revolutionized travel in such a short span of time. Today's airliners may be better in about every measurable way but certainly not more exciting.  Sad


User currently offlineCOAMiG29 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 515 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5463 times:


"Looks...short and ugly. Not that it matters.."..
a little spray paint and duck tape can fix that

does anyone know when the first flight is scheduled?



If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5413 times:

I can't wait to ride in that baby!


Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4373 times:

I agree she is ugly, but you have to think something:

The A380-800 is a huge thing, wingspan almost 80m (240ft?) and fuselage length 73m (220ft). Obviously there's a misproportion that will be somehow solved with the longer, 80m, A380-900. But further than that, there is another fact that should have been caught by photographer's views:

I'd say that the pic is taken quite close to the wingtip (though, roughly a few more than 40m) and despite this fact, the whole 73 metres of length fit into the image. The lens used must be quite angular, would not be able to tell how much, but for sure this causes a supplementary distortion of the whole shape.

For COAMiG29 and Trickijedi, some schedules say mid december 2004, and some others late january 2005. From Barcelona it is 3 1/2 hour drive, so for sure a few Iberian Spotters will be there...

Enjoy turbulences!!!

[Edited 2004-10-09 17:23:39]

User currently offlineLnglive1011yyz From Canada, joined Oct 2003, 1608 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4289 times:

OKay.. after MONTHS of reading posts about "asthetics" I have to ask:

DOES IT REALLY MATTER IF IT'S UGLY OR NOT?

It's a plane. Is it functional? I guess that's left to be discovered, but, what does the 'prettyness' of the plane have to do with it?

You know, it's sad. We have a little less than a year before the test flights are scheduled to take place. Are we going to have to have "It's ugly!" conversations EVERY time someone posts a pic?

Imagine back when the 747 was built. Never before had anyone seen such a large plane. Was it thought of just as "magnificent" and "majestic" as it is today?

We had NO idea that the 747 would look so majestic as it leaves the runway, or returns to the runway, so did people think it was nasty then too? Who knows.. What matters, is that it's a functional and very successful aircraft, who we have come to love and cherish and be mesmerized by it's sheer size and (what we now now) as beautiful lines.

GIVE IT A CHANCE. Please. For the sanity of ALL of us.

Oh my..

1011yyz



Pack your bags, we're going on a sympathy trip!
User currently offlineSingaporegirl From Singapore, joined Oct 2000, 302 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4063 times:

it's funny how a lot of people are trashing the looks of the a380 as short and ugly, yet most of these people are praising the pudgy looks of the b747sp. what's up with that?


Ladies & Gentlemen, we will now demonstrate the use of the safety equipment on this aircraft...
User currently offlineTrijetman From Germany, joined Oct 2004, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3963 times:

Obviously it's not a real beauty, but a lot of other fascinating airplanes weren't either...

However, Airbus never did make an effort to "stylize" their products a little bit to make them more pleasing to the eye. That's why, even as a European, I deeply admire what Boeing is doing with the 7E7: The cockpit windows just look sharp! Even on its current products (747, 757, 767, 777) they use nicely rounded, well designed (aesthetically speaking) cokpits windows that blend in perfectly with the fuselage and give a real visual signature to Boeing aircraft.

Airbus is always, even on the A380, using practically flat windows that consequently create ugly flat spots on the side of the fuselage right behind the cockpit. I can't see an advantage to that; aerodynamically it's probably even slightly less effective and if they're a bit cheaper - it probably doesn't make much of a difference on a millions of dollar object...

Also, Airbus engineers seem to like short stubby noses: Again, I don't see an advantage here, other than that it's not very pretty! Maybe I'm wrong though, so if somebody knows why Airbus' don't have the edge aesthetically - maybe there is a good reason for it?!

In any case, I can't wait to see the A380 in real - maybe Le Bourget next year? It'll really be something!

Cheers to you all and be happy!


User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3928 times:

That is one ugly "fat bahstad!" I agree, it would look SOOOO much better if it was longer. I think it's actually shorter than the 747, and around the length of the 772, not sure, and I don't want to look the stats up because I'm hungover.

User currently offlineAirbus3801 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1089 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3479 times:

Who put in their mind that this immediatly calls for an A v. B War, this is not what this post is supposed to be about.

That aside

I think the A380 looks quite amazing and think it is the biggest thing since the Concorde. Though the 7E7 is great too, it just cannot be compared against the 380 because they were both made for different purposes. But, the A380 is a bigger advancement because what would catch your eye, a big complete double decker aircraft or a basically crossover between a 757 and 767 with supposedly cool windows. Also, those are artists rendetions of the 7E7 therefore you shouldn't be so quick to judge how it is going to look against the 380.

With all that aside....

Just one question, when is the first test flight going to be?

Best to all of the companies

Nicholas

A I R B U S 3 8 0 #1

but the best to both companies who continue to amaze us with such great aircraft.


User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2224 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2420 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes definatly the wing vs rate ratio and lens vs camera angle accent the first. Beauty is impossible to define completly. Remember how many slammed the 7E7 here because the nose and/or tail was not conventional while others were excited by the very same things.

Purpose of design dictates results. Different approaches to the same problems can spawn different results. Beauty might then be additionally defind as acheivement of purpose through design.

[Edited 2004-10-09 22:43:48]


Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 21
Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2398 times:

Does everybody post without reading previous replies or what?
Replies 11, 12 & 13 ask or comment on things written on reply 8.

Further on, as said also, give it a chance: the aircraft in thepicture has no engines, her wings are not fully finished, and the colour is not the most beautiful one.

Let it be finished and painted, (and have a better perspective), consider that it is the short one, and after all this, maybe you'll see it slightly different, won't you?

Enjoy turbulences!!!


User currently offlineAirOrange From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

This A380 with skin, engines en paint.
Special thanks to French Frog AirSlides!



User currently offlineAM744 From Mexico, joined Jun 2001, 1773 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2298 times:

We had NO idea that the 747 would look so majestic as it leaves the runway, or returns to the runway

In fact it didn't, until the -400 series. IMO



User currently offlineFJWH From Netherlands, joined May 2004, 968 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2242 times:

Geee.. We need an information page with news/info about the A380. Questions like "when will the first flight be" and polls like "is the A380 ugly or not" has been asked sooooooo many times!!

BTW: Singaporegirl?: I like singapore AND I like girls...  Big thumbs up... You got MSN  Big grin!?

FJWH  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



FlightS in the next 3 months: MSP, PHX, MEM, NCE, TFS, BCN. All round trips from AMS
User currently offlineFJWH From Netherlands, joined May 2004, 968 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

AirOrange I forgot to say, that pic with engines and livery looks freakin' fantastic! A huge monster and I like it!! Are those engines really that massive?

FJWH  Smile



FlightS in the next 3 months: MSP, PHX, MEM, NCE, TFS, BCN. All round trips from AMS
User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

The 747 carries its bulk with a svelt gracefully appearance. The A380 just looks butt ugly. And this is coming from a big Airbus fan. But what disappoints me about the A380 is how big it's not. In 1969, the then current biggest airliner, the 707, carried about 180 passengers. The 747 more than doubled the ante. And the MGTOW was over 2.5 times greater. What a revolution in size! The current biggest airplane, however, the 747, carries about 450 passengers leaving the A380 only about 20% larger in size and only 25% larger in MGTOW. And no larger in general dimensions. Yet this extra 20% is heralded both by Airbus fans as a huge leap forward, and by anti-Airbus critics as a doomed unweildy monstrosity. It is neither. It's just a ho-hum plane with two complete decks.


An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineCuautli From Mexico, joined Jun 2004, 19 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2008 times:

I know that these are not similar a/c but for those who complain about as aesthetics on the A380, Is the F-117 aesthetic?

User currently offlineYOW4NOW From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 45 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

Now I know what an airplane on steroids looks like. Muscles out of place, misconfiguration, awkward....the list goes on.

But, if it gets people from A to B without hassle...who's to complain?


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29791 posts, RR: 58
Reply 23, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1980 times:

AirOrange....

Can you paint one up like Nemo the Clownfish?



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAAgent From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 560 posts, RR: 14
Reply 24, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1970 times:

I've got to admit, she's BUTT UGLY, but I can't wait to rock down the runway in that big fat bird! Hurry up and fill'er up with Jet-A, Big Bird is ready to fly!

AAgent



War Eagle!
User currently offlineAirOrange From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 25, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

FJWH,

No, the engines look fatter because of the angle the original picture has been taken. Watch the wing tip and winglet! They seem to be out of proportion too but in fact it is the perpective that effects it.

The picture below gives you a better view on the proportions:



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A380 Photo. posted Fri Oct 8 2004 22:32:09 by Jbond
First A380 Photo On Airliners.net posted Tue Mar 30 2004 07:36:48 by N600SU
Qatar A380 New Livery Modified Photo posted Fri Jun 2 2006 18:10:23 by 777way
A380 Has It's Own Gate In Frankfurt (photo) posted Mon Oct 31 2005 23:40:19 by Airfoilsguy
A380 Rollout Preview - Slideshow & Big Photo posted Mon Jan 17 2005 07:52:24 by Ants
New Photo...A380 With Wings posted Thu May 27 2004 16:30:23 by Futterman
Where Is Category For This Photo - A380 posted Wed Mar 31 2004 15:24:51 by Saleem
Link To A380 Type Certificate Data Sheet posted Tue Dec 12 2006 22:56:44 by Dougloid
A380 Noise Levels posted Tue Dec 12 2006 18:40:30 by Aeroman444
A380 Gets Easa Approval posted Tue Dec 12 2006 12:36:46 by LHStarAlliance