Radelow From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 426 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 3268 times:
Or even better...Why don't you get some facts and look at the ratio of flight miles flown and incidents per flight miles. Then compare it to other aircraft. If you were to show some "higher than normal" % for the 777 THEN you might have something to discuss.
Ua777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (9 years 11 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2926 times:
The 777 is well built and it's engines are perfectly fine. You think there are a lot of EMR Landings??? There are well more than double the ammount of EMR landings involving the 777 that go unreported. LIKE A LOT of incidents. Yet at the same time the 777 project is a major part of the backbone of Boeing. And orders are out the door daily..... (i'll get crap for that last comment)
AA777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2544 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (9 years 11 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2859 times:
If there were a real problem, they would do something about it. I know that-- as concordeboy stated-- they are probably the most reliable planes in the sky. EMRs take place on any A/C from 777's to A340s (CCboys favorite)... haha...