Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
5 Farmers Vs. Airbus & City Of Hamburg  
User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1050 posts, RR: 6
Posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3596 times:

Right now the City government (mayor and senate - as Hamburg is a City aswell as a state) of Hamburg is undertaking it's last efforts to break the deadlock on the dispute of the runway extension at XFW which is essential for Hamburg getting the delivery center for the A380, and thus creating and preserving a huge number of jobs in the region.

A group of farmers of a nearby village however oppose the runway extension. And the 5 farmers which still decline to sell their land are not even participating in the talks. Their spokeswoman Mrs. Gabi Quast simply said: "We don't expect anything from the talks, so we are not going to participate in them."

Unfortunately the courts are on "her" side. In a tv interview about an hour ago she told the reporter very blatantly and in a very arrogant way that she doesn't care one bit about anything the city or Airbus say or offer.
So here we have a group of 5 (!) stubborn farmers + one priest, that have declined offers of new and bigger estates plus 3 million Euros in exchange for their land that is needed for the runway extension and hold a whole region hostage for no reason! No wonder I am fuming right now.

I hope the many thousand jobless of Hamburg will go and thank the farmers in an appropriate way!  Pissed

I will watch how the situation developes tonight.


The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26196 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3562 times:

Wow, I would take 3 million and a bigger lot for that. Then again, people have to realize that these people were there before XFW and it is hard to leave your home. Imagine if someone asked you to leave the place you grew up for this. These are sweetheart deals, but I know I would never want to sell my parent's house for something of this nature (good thing there is no airport anywhere nearby)


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1050 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3511 times:

" Then again, people have to realize that these people were there before XFW and it is hard to leave your home."

That's indeed the reason they cited.
But they are very privileged that they actually CAN move. Families of unemployed people, too, will have to leave their homes.

Also Mrs Quast thinks she is Queen of The World. She was very arrogant on tv today and the main reason against selling her land is simply stubborness and pride. She seems to like the idea she holds the fate of the region in her hands.  Insane

Links are hard to find, so here is one, for now
http://segeberg.nordclick.de/news/archiv/?id=1516257&dbci=1 (sorry German only)



The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
User currently offlineNyc777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5666 posts, RR: 47
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3508 times:

Boy it sounds like the delivery center is going to move to Toulouse!


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineLtbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 12878 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3488 times:

In the USA, while there there can be similar disputes, we allow in our Constitution the right of eminent domain, where the Government can require someone to sell their land/property at a fair maket value to allow for necessary public good/projects. Usually in the past this has allowed for the paths needed for roads and the construction of other public facilities. There are problems (and a recent book on the subject) when this is abused, such as to tear down houses for a mall, commercial or residential development, especially if it displaces low income people. While there can be holdouts here too, it is a lot more difficult to object especially if lots of jobs (like the situation in Hamburg noted here) exists.

User currently offlineNdebele From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 2898 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3463 times:

Boy it sounds like the delivery center is going to move to Toulouse!
They should indeed think about moving the A380 Delivery Center to Toulouse, and move e.g. the A320 production to Hamburg instead. I always wondered why they build the A319 and A321 in Hamburg and the A320 still in Toulouse. This move would simplify the production of both A380 and A320 series.

Just my two cents - hate me now!


User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1050 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3414 times:

"Boy it sounds like the delivery center is going to move to Toulouse!"

Airbus has told the mayor to have the dispute settled by the end of the month or the delivery center will go to Toulouse.

Actually the authorities have done a piss-poor job aswell, that's why the court(s) have decided in favor of the farmers.
The judges said that only because Airbus can't deliver the freighter version from XFW they do not see the immediate need to order the farmersw to sell their land, weird world and abuse of rights indeed.  Insane



The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3409 times:

Keep in mind that there is still a sweet potato farmer who owns the land between the two ends of Tokyo Narita's second runway...


Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
User currently offlineRamerinianair From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3379 times:

And Airbus didn't see this as something to secure before they started the A380? I'm superised that airbus didn't bid for the land earlier. It's getting closer ans closer to the first flight and they haven't figured out if it's XFW or toulouse!
PanAm747,
That's pretty interesting . . . please tell me more on that!
SR



W N = my Worst Nightmare!!!!!
User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1050 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3281 times:

Well, the only problem is the freighter version. The pax versioned will be outfited at XFW, but the delivery center will be at Toulouse, and that's a sad (and unnecessary!!!) loss for Hamburg.

Local tv reports the talks were succesful ...in the sense they've agreed to come together and negotiate again next week.  Sad



The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 3151 times:

In the USA, while there there can be similar disputes, we allow in our Constitution the right of eminent domain, where the Government can require someone to sell their land/property at a fair maket value to allow for necessary public good/projects.

Most European countries have similar legislation, but it normally takes a while to "evict" the unwilling. Besides which the issue becomes hugely inflamed and those officials want to be reelected so...



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3040 times:

We can all be glad that France has brought Airbus forward over the past decades...they have done anything to build up the company to its today's importance and they still do anything. Just look what they have done to make the A380 production possible...they built new roads between Bordeaux and Toulouse, they block off road sections for the huge trucks carrying A380 parts, they had to deal with the difficulties with a historic bridge at Bordeaux...Airbus is a subject of national interest in France. And Germany? Not able at all to add some more feet to the runway at Finkenwerder...

With German command at Airbus, the company would have never grown to its current status...instead we would have seen another Dornier story...and many happy people enjoying some more square feet of fresh, green grass instead of job creating factories...


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2952 times:

For sure we have the same right. And the local government relied on that. So the local government and airbus made the fault not to try to reach a friendly agreement and instead were very rude to the land owners.
Some weeks ago a court decided - which was a big surprise for airbus and the city - that the decision to take the land was not appropriately argumented. The arguments that it lies in public interest to take the land were not balanced enough said the court.
And now Airbus and especially the city are in big trouble. They lost all their credibility and some land owners are still not willing to sell their land. Thats the background.
Now the local goverment tries to negotiate directly with the land owners and offer them a huge amount of money. But its difficult to buy peoples pride.



User currently offlineUAL747DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2392 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2929 times:

I have to side with the farmers on this one. This is not my usual but they are right. They have been in that spot for years before Airbus was ever dreamed up and they should be able to stay just as long as they want. Now the appropriate thing for Airbus to do would be to just keep offering them more and more money until they feel right selling the land or even working out some sort of deal that maybe lets them keep some part of the land or anything that they can do to make this deal work. That is how you do business. Like mentioned above, we shouldn't be reading about this now this is something that should have been taken care of a long time ago before the project was even approved.


/// UNITED AIRLINES
User currently offlineNdebele From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 2898 posts, RR: 23
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2763 times:

Keep in mind that there is still a sweet potato farmer who owns the land between the two ends of Tokyo Narita's second runway...
A potato farmer in Japan  Confused


User currently offlineStratofish From Germany, joined Sep 2001, 1050 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2709 times:

A day later and a link becomes available:
http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2004/10/22/355296.html

Sorry it's in German only. I ran it thru babelfish but all it produced was nonsense.

However the story ends, Hamburg should really rethink giving subsidies to these farmers and to that church who refuse to sell their, sometimes unused, land and sabotage the economy.

So far polls indicate 65% of Hamburg are in favor of Airbus and 35% support the farmers.

Btw, I consider myself as an environmentalist (that many of you know I am) but these people do not argue with or act in favor of the ideas of environmentalism. Just in case some ppl were wondering.



The Metro might be the Sub(optimal)way
User currently offlineFraT From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 1101 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2637 times:

I'm pretty sure that these farmers are also payed by the environmentalists who have always opposed the runway extension.

User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24810 posts, RR: 56
Reply 17, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2604 times:

Pay them 30 million Euro's each, that should do it. If they dont accept it, leave them to live their lives peacefully.


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlinePhaeton From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 406 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2412 times:

That farmer at Narita has chickens and doesn't grow potatoes.




"History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.", Winston Churchill
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BUR & City Of Burbank Reach New Agreement posted Thu Jun 24 2004 20:50:15 by FATFlyer
Aer Lingus Pulls Out Of Gatwick & City posted Fri Jun 20 2003 16:36:26 by Britair
Wher To Find Fair Comparision Of Boeing Vs. Airbus posted Wed Mar 14 2001 20:09:16 by Sbbre44
City Of Provo Seeks I-15 Access Road To PVU posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:37:44 by SLCUT2777
FI: Is Airbus In Danger Of Being A One Trick Pony? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 15:45:28 by Leelaw
Aircraft Deliveries Airbus & Boeing, Bottom Line.. posted Thu Nov 23 2006 00:04:08 by Keesje
Airbus 3000th Set Of A32X Wings Completed. posted Fri Nov 10 2006 19:26:10 by WINGS
Kellner Warning The City Of Houston? posted Tue Oct 31 2006 00:49:55 by Thomasphoto60
Airbus Replaces Head Of A380 Program posted Mon Sep 4 2006 13:05:23 by Tootallsd
Y3 Vs Airbus 380 posted Sat Sep 2 2006 22:35:04 by Boeing7478i