Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Comparison Between Ryanair And EasyJet  
User currently offlineIDAWA From Italy, joined Aug 2004, 303 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 6018 times:

I've flown some 7 segments with FR since 1999, and last weekend I first flew with U2.
Personally, being used to FR's low cost service, I was quite impressed by U2, since they seem to have a look even at the quality of their service!
While I credit Ryanair a lot for pioneering low-cost flying in Europe, and I will for sure be flying with them again, I think they are at the border of boasting themselves for treating you badly to get a low-cost service! I'm not saying that U2 provides you with free champagne during their flights, but at least they try to minimize the disadvantages from keeping the fare low.
I live near Turin, Italy, and I went to London for a weekend. The flight is operated both by FR and U2, and here's a comparison between the two services:

- The FR return flight on sunday was very early in the morning, so it was completely unuseful for me, the return should have been on monday morning (so, one more night at the hotel). U2 had a return flight on sunday evening!

- The airport: FR flies to STN, that is farther from London than LTN (U2 destination) is. Apart from the time for getting to the city, last time I went to STN in 2000 the train ticket for London was 22 pounds return, while easyBus service took me to a northern tube station for just 2 pounds return.

- FR wants you to be at the check-in two hours before departure, U2 allows you to be there till 30 minutes before.

- And finally, unlike FR, nobody bothered me while taking pictures of the U2 passenger cabin..  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


Again, I'm NOT saying that U2 is good and FR is evil. They're in fact both good carriers, and I'll enjoy flying both of them in the future. I'd just like to know if some of you has had the same impressions as me!

I-DAWA.


Flown on: 319, 320, 321, 340, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, DC9, D10, M11, M80, 146, EM2, BEH, CRJ, DH8, L4T.
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5927 times:

Re: Again, I'm NOT saying that U2 is good and FR is evil.

I am !  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Seriously, U2 have a good product, their scheduling is convenient and they fly to convenient airports. That, and their attempts at service recovery when things go pear-shaped and it's their fault, put them ahead of FR. For instance, I was due to fly ORY-NCE a few weeks back, but owing to a ground-handling strike, the flight was cancelled. Without any fuss or bother, the U2 staff on the ticket desk put me on a flight out of CDG that evening, no charge, I didn't even have to ask, they just rebooked me, which was great.



User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19097 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5817 times:

"FR flies to STN, that is farther from London than LTN."

The difference is about 4 miles. Hardly anything important. The cost of getting to Heathrow (using the Heathrow Express) and back is £25 and takes about 15 minutes each way; the cost of getting to Gatwick (using the Gatwick Express) and back is £23.50 and takes about 30 minutes each way; the cost of getting to Stansted (using the Stansted Express) and back is £24.00 and takes about 45 minutes each way. In view of the difference in duration, the price to get to and from Stansted is better than the others. I would be more annoyed about paying £25 for a total of 30 minutes on a train.

FR wants you to be at the check-in two hours before departure, U2 allows you to be there till 30 minutes before."

No. You can check-in until 40 minutes before departure on FR, which goes someway in ensuring that its flights depart ontime, which is why U2's punctuality is always worse than FR's.

JPG - if FR cancels a flight, it will either a) put you onto its next available flight; or b) refund your money. What it won't do, just like U2, trains, buses, etc., is put you into a hotel and give you meals, etc. But FR VERY RARELY cancels a flight. From FR's T&Cs:

'All monies paid (including taxes, fees and charges) are non-refundable unless your flight is cancelled or significantly rescheduled by Ryanair in which case you are entitled to a travel credit or full refund of all monies paid.'

I ALWAYS get exactly what I want when I fly with FR - a friendly service; always cheap fares; superb punctuality; brilliant reliability; and a great, uneventful flight. I am 6', yet I find the legroom perfectly fine and the seats are always, in my opinion, comfortable. No frills, but then I don't need sub-standard food or drink, or a newspaper, anyway.

[Edited 2004-10-22 13:25:57]


"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19097 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5777 times:

"The FR return flight on sunday was very early in the morning."

Odd, seeing FR flies STN-TRN twice-daily, even on Sundays! The flights leave STN at 0630 and 1840, and arrive into TRN at 0930 and 2140 respectively. From TRN to STN, the flights leave at 0955 and 2205, getting into STN at 1055 and 2305 respectively.



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineJamesvf84 From Switzerland, joined Sep 2003, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5695 times:

In the view of difference of duration I would tend to go for the underground, direct from LHR to Piccadilly (Centre of London) £4.00 for 50mins! Each way.

User currently offlineIDAWA From Italy, joined Aug 2004, 303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5654 times:

Pe@rson,
strange thing about the London to Turin flight, when I looked for reservations on www.ryanair.com I wasn't shown that flight, but only the earlier one (departing at 0630 and arriving at 0930). I can't find an explaination on this, may you help me?

You are right about the check-in time, I've looked at the confirmation email of my last FR flight and it tells that the check-in closes 40 minutes before departure, even 30 in many airports. This was my own fault, sorry about.

About the airport in London, I'm happy I spent just 2 GBP return to get to a tube station, since you showed me that Luton is not only chaper than Stansted, but also than Heathrow and Gatwick!

I-DAWA.



Flown on: 319, 320, 321, 340, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, DC9, D10, M11, M80, 146, EM2, BEH, CRJ, DH8, L4T.
User currently offlineAirtrainer From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 1557 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5629 times:

- And finally, unlike FR, nobody bothered me while taking pictures of the U2 passenger cabin..

I agree with you, last month I thought the F/A was going to kill me when she saw my camera, and she even put my binoculars in the headbin !

Jef



Life is short : eat dessert first !
User currently offlineIDAWA From Italy, joined Aug 2004, 303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5556 times:

Airtrainer,
I was also rudely requested by a FR cabin staff to stop photographing the cabin...but I wonder why such rule! I really don't understand it! Does anyone know its sense?

I-DAWA



Flown on: 319, 320, 321, 340, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, DC9, D10, M11, M80, 146, EM2, BEH, CRJ, DH8, L4T.
User currently offlineAirtrainer From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 1557 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5524 times:

I-DAWA, I also don't understand that stupid rule. Here's a link to a thread posted last month... enjoy  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1735090/4/

I must say that I've never had any problem with different carriers before...

Jef



Life is short : eat dessert first !
User currently offlineAdriaticflight From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 514 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5521 times:

I'm flown lots with both U2 and FR and they are very similar. Easyjet has the best website, FR wibsite is a mess.
U2 fly to 'major' airports like Amsterdam Schiphol and Copenhagen Kastrup. This is great and I use them 2/3times a year to fly to Holland. However this doesn't mean that the 'grass strips' as people sometimes call them are anyless useful. I have actually wanted/needed to go to Klagenfurt, Graz or Trieste. So in this respect FR are better as they have made it easier to get to some areas of our beautiful continent.

P.S. Have you seen the new Easyjet website. very nice.


User currently offlineGreenjet From Ireland, joined Aug 2001, 939 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5387 times:

I was also rudely requested by a FR cabin staff to stop photographing the cabin...but I wonder why such rule! I really don't understand it! Does anyone know its sense?

It's probably a management instruction claiming that the flash damages the safety instructions on the backs of seats and over time this would lead to extra costs in replacing them  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineKatanapilot From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 170 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5277 times:

i have to agree with all the differences.

i have a better time on easyjet. i think the staff are treated better by the company than ryanair. the pilots are always friendly sounding, and typically even crack a joke. ryanair staff has always seemed cold to me.

i still can't believe that i flew to hamburg(lubeck) with FR and when i got there, FR had a bus waiting to go to Hamburg which they charged 8 euros for. a little steep in my opinion...especially since they fly you into an airfield an hour out of hamburg.


User currently offlineFoxiboy From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 208 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 5243 times:

I much prefer U2 to FR and always have done not that i fly locost very often,i would never fly FR again i flew with them once and that was enough, besides EI was cheaper and the service better even now they have gone loco,besides any airline that treats its people they way FR does deserves all the shit it gets.

User currently offlineFJWH From Netherlands, joined May 2004, 968 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 5164 times:

I've flown FR twice now and U2 4 times! I like them both and on the 20th of November my next U2 flight is planned.
But you have to be carefull with judging U2 & FR (or any other airline) if you have only like flown them one's or twice....! (the usual; cabincrew had a bad day etc etc)



FlightS in the next 3 months: MSP, PHX, MEM, NCE, TFS, BCN. All round trips from AMS
User currently offlineHorus From Egypt, joined Feb 2004, 5230 posts, RR: 60
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 5147 times:

U2 wins hands down everytime, though I really do hate their older 733s (very tatty and warn out).

Viva La Easyjet


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kmb



Horus




EGYPT: A 7,000 Year Old Civilisation
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 36
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 5107 times:

I prefer Easyjet by far. When I fly them, I almost feel like i'm flying a full-fare airline with premium service. The aircraft are clean, modern and airy, have a charter airline feel to them. Staff are friendly, apologetic if there is a delay and endeavour to help with anything that goes wrong, rather than give you the finger. They fly at more appropriate times to more appropriate airports and have a good in-flight magazine  Big grin. You do feel they're trying to save on costs but it doesn't effect you that much, like asking for your magazine back if you don't want it, charging for food but not being extortionate, and offering a reasonable product.

User currently offlineIDAWA From Italy, joined Aug 2004, 303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 5014 times:

Greenjet,
This is the most likely reason.  Smokin cool

FJWH,
You're absoutely right with your statement that you can't judge an airline if you have flown it just twice. I've been told that sometimes even Singapore Airlines' service screws up! The aim of this thread was to see if the impressions I collected in these two flights were right or not

EGGD,
Exactely my thoughts.

I-DAWA.



Flown on: 319, 320, 321, 340, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, DC9, D10, M11, M80, 146, EM2, BEH, CRJ, DH8, L4T.
User currently offlineDouglasDC10 From Germany, joined Feb 2000, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4992 times:

I flew both, U2 and FR and would give a slight advantage for Ryanair. Their service might be worse than that of Easyjet. But the chances of getting the low fares are better with Ryanair and FR's punctuality is better than EZY's. Similar to IDAWA, I do not want to say that EZY is evil and FR is good. It's just my first impression of both carriers.

User currently offlineGreenjet From Ireland, joined Aug 2001, 939 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4865 times:

I have flown Ryanair 55 times and never had a problem. I have flown easyJet 8 times and experienced several delays and a diversion (not the airline's fault I have to say). In terms of price and punctuality FR are better*. In terms of comfort and service EZY are better*. However to me price and punctuality are the two key criteria when flying so I prefer FR. I don't care about buying food onboard or receiving a smile from cabin crew - I just want to get from A to B. Some people say easyJet fly to more convenient airports. That may be the case for a lot of pax but a lot of the FR airports are convenient for people who previosuly had to travel long distances to avail of air services. For example people living in Trier are served by Hahn, people in Sandefjord are served by Torp, people in Nykoping can use Skavsta, etc. It doesn't really matter though which of the two is better - it's just nice to have a choice.

* It's all a matter of opinion  Smile


User currently offlineRedDragon From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 1135 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 4810 times:

Most of the differences noted between Ryanair and easyJet stem from their differing strategies. Ryanair goes primarily after the leisure market, giving the rock-bottom fares that come from, amongst other things, using small regional airports. easyJet is more conscious of the business market, with more convenient frequencies to more central airports in exchange for slightly higher fares than Ryanair. Which suits you best often depends largely on whether you're a business or holiday passenger.

Rich  Smile


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ryanair And EasyJet Catering posted Thu Oct 21 2004 01:38:39 by Lucid
Why No Wingtips On Ryanair And EasyJet 737NG's? posted Wed Apr 7 2004 21:16:24 by Gilesdavies
Ryanair And EasyJet Facts? posted Tue Nov 26 2002 04:38:17 by Qantas777
Startling Cost Differential Between BA And EasyJet posted Thu Jan 17 2002 18:56:18 by Eugdog
Comparison Data Between E190 And A318? posted Wed Aug 24 2005 02:19:16 by Flyibaby
Difference Between Southwest And Ryanair Model posted Wed May 1 2002 12:14:44 by Airblue
Ryanair And Marrakesh posted Mon Nov 20 2006 07:30:47 by Madairdrie
Crazy Low Fares Between India And The UK posted Fri Nov 10 2006 11:06:10 by TheDiplomat
SQ Service Between MXP And BCN posted Mon Nov 6 2006 23:57:27 by RetroLivery
Battle Brewing Between Ethiopian And Kenya Airways posted Sun Oct 29 2006 19:57:47 by ETStar