Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin, Singapore Expand Code-Share To The US  
User currently offlineNZblue From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 638 posts, RR: 3
Posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4660 times:

Singapore Airlines and Virgin Atlantic expand code-share to the U.S.

http://asia.news.yahoo.com/041021/3/1q6nv.html


It's an entirely different kind of flying; all together.
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4634 times:

One more birdie finger to UA Big grin

User currently offlineUA744KSFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4545 times:

Makes sense. SQ is a joint venture partner in VS. I believe that they own a 49% stake in VS and then Branson owns 51%.

Think about this. If the Virgin branded airlines and SQ were to team up, they'd probably be able to form a global alliance by themselves!


User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4480 times:

I don't know why they don't do this. imagine if SQ, VS and jet blue formed an alliance. it would eventually be one to be reconked with

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4462 times:

imagine if SQ, VS and jet blue formed an alliance.

The corporate cultures are somewhat incompatible; SQ is fiercely protective of its premium clientele... such that this would only be of much benefit to the patronage which matters least to that airline's bottom line.



User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8459 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4399 times:

The corporate cultures are somewhat incompatible; SQ is fiercely protective of its premium clientele... such that this would only be of much benefit to the patronage which matters least to that airline's bottom line.

yes but if they were all merged into one entity, the moneys going into the same pocket in the end isn't it?

however seeing the three merged into one entity seems highly unlikley.


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1625 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4392 times:

I don't know why they don't do this. imagine if SQ, VS and jet blue formed an alliance. it would eventually be one to be reconked with

Dont forget that Virgin America is planned to launch in 2005. This has no connection with SQ (as far as I know), and would possibly duplicate some Jetblue routes.

Although SQ own 49% of VS, VS have always retained the driving seat as far as their product and proposition is concerned. Codeshares are a natural extention of this shareholding - nothing else.

The question for me is, as stated by Concordeboy, how UA will react to this - a partner airline in Star giving codeshares to a non-star airline - on the LHR- Washington route.

Interesting!


User currently offlineWhitehatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4387 times:

The question for me is, as stated by Concordeboy, how UA will react to this - a partner airline in Star giving codeshares to a non-star airline - on the LHR- Washington route.

It's the other way round.

VS is codesharing its flights with SQ LHR-IAD. VS is the non-Star carrier.

As for Virgin America, that's a Branson business outside of VS so SQ isn't involved at any level. Same with Virgin Express in Europe which is owned by those secretive family trusts the Bransons have.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4369 times:

however seeing the three merged into one entity seems highly unlikley.

My point exactly.

If they were ever to get to a merged stasis, then none of my aforementioned post would matter. The subject at hand however, is that they'd have to move heaven and earth just to get to that point; such that the likelihood of it ever occurring is so slim as to be functionally negligible


User currently offlineStudentFlyer From Australia, joined Sep 2004, 688 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4319 times:

I'd say that UA will probably have to give SQ its choice, as SQ, as we would say, owns half of VS, so that comes first over an alliance. I don't know how an alliance policy works, but I think that's how UA will see it as anyway. How about if we put into context, that VS is a subsidiary of SQ?

Regards,
AK


User currently offlineWhitehatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4299 times:

It depends on the airline.

For instance, BD codeshares with MH on its domestic flights. MH is 'almost' Skyteam but BD is Star. BD also codeshare with VS.

Virgin also has deals with Continental and Delta, both Skyteam carriers. Delta flights from Gatwick carry VS codes, same with CO.

Alliances are formal business arrangements but not binding. Other individual arrangements can also be made outside the Alliance framework.


User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1488 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4248 times:

DL and VS no longer code-share. They stopped code-sharing when the CO/VS code-sharing agreement begun. However, they started a frequent flyer partnership a few years back. VS is now a full participant in CO's frequent flyer programme. Until fairly recently, CO OnePass members could only earn miles on VS flights if they we booked on the CO code-share flight number - that is no longer the case. SQ has long had a frequent flyer relationship with DL - no such relationship exists between CO and SQ.

User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4210 times:

What is this about corporate cultures being incompatible??????????? helloo????????? in case you all are not aware. The corp culture of JB and VS are quite similar; down to the number of ex VS employees working at JB. VS and SQ already have a relationship. Do I need to go on??

On the other hand, what could be more dissimilar than the number of carrires in the star alliance. You have SQ the admittedly best carrier in the world in an alliance with the likes of UA (bankrupt with crappy service) LH (cold, unfriendly and rigid) do I need to go on

An alliance between JB,SQ and VS would be more successful. SQ the best in the world, JB one of the best in the USA. VS one of the best in the world.


User currently offlineVS045 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 192 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3989 times:

VS, SQ and jet blue would be a great alliance, especially in the american market. SQ, VS and virgin express? What would VS and SQ's business passengers think after flying 12 hours in Virgin's upper class or SQ's first and then have to get on to a cramped virgin express 'plane.

Cheers,
VS045



4 engines 4 long haul
User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3788 times:

Hi VS45

The JB in my posts refered to Jet Blue. The only weak spot in such an alliance of SQ,VS and Jet Blue (can't remember the code) would be Africa. Hmm perhaps they could convince Emirates or SAA to become a member.


User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

The code for JetBlue is B6.

User currently offlineUA744KSFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3480 times:

Hi Aerofan,

Actually, Africa wouldn't be a problem is this latest Branson venture gets off the ground:

http://www.virginnigeria.com


User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 3408 times:

Thanks ZVEZ,

Hi UA744 you are right about that Smile forgot about it.


User currently offlineKA501 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 3336 times:

Virgin have been codesharing with Singapore for some time on the Manchester Orlando flight VS74/75 flight number SQ2574/2575.
Virgin have the same arrangment on the Manchester Singapore legs.

What puzzles me is if Singapore has a 49% stake in Virgin, why is'nt Virgin a member of Star Alliance? it must be of mutual benefit.


User currently offlineUA744KSFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 3310 times:

Well, even with a 49% share, SQ is still the minority shareholder in VS. Branson is still the majority shareholder, so he makes the decisions about which alliances VS will join. As we know, so far, he hasn't decided to let VS or any other Virgin branded airlines join any. However, VS does code share with several carriers, and UA's code is placed on some SYD-BNE flights operated by DJ.

User currently offlineStargoldlhr From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (10 years 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3106 times:

I think VS is just sitting on the toilet when it comes to alliances...
sooner or later they have to drop one or get off the pot  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

VS should probably join star as soon as the standards of other star carriers climb up to their levels...

for me... in London I go BMI as much as convienient via MAN to the US or SQ / LH / TG.

I use UA mostly.. but if VS Joined.. UA would virtually lose all my business.



So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (10 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

I don't think star would be a good match. hmmmmmmm the only one would be the sky team one in terms of routes.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Frontier To Expand Code-share To 35 Cities. posted Sat Nov 10 2001 01:20:47 by BA
Virgin & BMI To Expand Code Share posted Sun Nov 7 2004 14:22:28 by Aerofan
Virgin Blue Routes To The US? posted Mon Sep 19 2005 07:26:23 by Bakestar
US Code Share To Cuba? posted Fri Mar 18 2005 21:34:59 by Indio66
UA/US Implement Code Share To SJU, STT posted Thu Feb 13 2003 07:17:16 by Gigneil
Aeromexico Expands To The US (MCO, IAH, ORD) posted Tue Oct 31 2006 17:51:25 by Juventus
Fluids In Carry On Luggage To The US Questions posted Thu Oct 26 2006 18:50:39 by Paneuropean
Flying To The US posted Thu Oct 19 2006 14:46:15 by NORTHSEATIGER
All AF Flights To The US Now From Terminal 2E@CDG posted Thu Sep 7 2006 07:49:13 by Haggis79
Narita To The US: Not A Market For The A380 posted Thu Aug 31 2006 20:01:23 by Incitatus