Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Flagship Service  
User currently offlinePlanecrazy2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 615 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4014 times:

I know that American operates the 762ER on the NYC-LAX/SFO premium routes. How old are these aircraft compared to their 763ERs? What are their plans for retiring the 762ERs a few years down the road. What will AA replace them with? Any comments?


Planecrazy2


United Airlines - Worldwide Service
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3955 times:

AA's 767-200ERs are, on average, about 16 to 17 years old, which would make them a couple of years older than AA's oldest 763ER. Remember, the AA 763ER fleet was acquired over many many years.....AA's newest 763ER is only about a year old and was part of an order made to replace the ex-TWA 767s. Note that AA only flies the ER version of the 762 at the moment, it has parked the its non-ER models (which are about 18 to 20 years old) and it does not seem as if those aircraft will retutn to service.

I do not think that AA has any plans at the moment to replace its 762s, they still have years of flying left and are low-cycle aircraft, most only fly 2 segments per day. The 762s are the right size for the transcon routes on which they are utilized.....frequency is important in this market and the 763s or 777s would simply be too big to maintain the current number of flights. UA has decided to try 757s with a special premium service configuration on its JFK-California transcons, which are very oriented towards full fare/premium pax, but I do not think that AA will follow UA's lead.....AA is still very much interested in moving lots of passengers between the coasts while UA is tailoring its flights to its loyal business customers.

Eventually, when finances permit, I assume that AA will look to replace its 762 and A300 fleets (and eventually its 763 fleet) with versions of Boeing's 7e7....however, AA is certainly in no position to order new aircraft at the moment, AA's 3rd quarter results were rather dismal and AA still has a way to go to return to profitability.


User currently offlineAAplatnumflier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3769 times:

So is there the possibility of doing what UA did on their 757 but with AA on their 762? Boy would that be fun!!

User currently offlineQqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2296 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3595 times:

AA's 762ERs are three class, premium product aircraft with 9 first class seats, 30 business class seats and 119 coach seats. It is, in my opinion, the best trans-con service out there. First class pax still get five course meals on china, business class gets a great three course meal and coach still receives hot meals on these flights.

First class pax are also treated to personal DVD players with 20 movie selections and Bose Noise Cancelling headsets.

The 762ERs operate between JFK and LAX and JFK and SFO. AA used to have three class trans-cons between IAD-LAX, MIA-LAX, BOS-LAX, BOS-SFO and MIA-SFO. These all ended with the 762 non-ER aircraft going into storage.



The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offlineJpetekYXMD80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 4391 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3534 times:

So is there the possibility of doing what UA did on their 757 but with AA on their 762? Boy would that be fun!!

Its what theyve been doing..



The Best Care in the Air, 1984-2009
User currently offlineAAplatnumflier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

I would love to see AA bring back BOS-LAX with a 762 as I dont like the 738's on such long routes. I dont like being on the 738 for that long. But thats what I have to do when I fly to BOS.



User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26709 posts, RR: 75
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3433 times:

I really don't care if I am on a widebody or a narrowbody, as long as the service is good and I find a way into the exit row. Also, unless I am on a 747 or L-1011, I prefer a 757 to any plane. I flew United's old flagship product on the 762 last year LAX-JFK-LAX on a trip to FRA (LH FRA-JFK-FRA, JFK-FRA on the relatively light 744 was great) and it was fine. I found it strange to still have 3 class service on a domestic route, but Y was empty while the front was full, so UA probably made some money on the deal.


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently onlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2424 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3363 times:


AA's 762ERs are three class, premium product aircraft with 9 first class seats, 30 business class seats and 119 coach seats. It is, in my opinion, the best trans-con service out there.


Yes, but the "wooly mammoths" have to go. Those things are ugly and embarassing.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26709 posts, RR: 75
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3350 times:

Wooly Mammoths? Want to splain dat one to me mang?


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineNwfltattendant From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3300 times:

LONG LIVE THE WOOLEY MAMMOTH SEATS !!!!! I flow Transatlantic in both F and C class in the Wooley mammoth seats and i couldnt have been happier and the end if each flight!!!!!!!!


Go yakkin !!!!!!
User currently onlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2424 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3246 times:


Wooly Mammoths? Want to splain dat one to me mang?


On AA's 3-class 762's, the F seats are these huge(hence mammoth) seats with sheepskin material(wooly). The last ones I saw looked kind of worn and gross.

I wouldn't pay to sit in those seats. I'd rather have a coffin.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineCOEWR2587 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 607 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3143 times:

Does anyone have any pics of these "Wooley Mammoth" seats. I can't seem to ever find pics of AA's F class pics on the 767.


Newark Airport...My Home Away From Home
User currently offlineNYCAAer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 693 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3114 times:

The Woolly Mammoth seats are still around? I haven't been on a 762 in years because I fly international. I know the B/C seats are combination of cloth and leather. I always thought the sheepskin seats were ugly, too.

The 14 762s in Roswell aren't coming back. According to an AA mechanic in the forum, 7 of them are being broken up, and he would be in the know on those things. I don't expect AA to retire the remaining 762ERs anytime soon. Most are 1986 or 1987 vintage. There's also nothing AA could use as a replacement, for the time being, although 2 of its JFK-SFO flights are currently flown with a 763ER.


User currently offlineAASTEW From Dominican Republic, joined Oct 2001, 447 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2924 times:

The old wool seats on AA 767-200 A/C are being replaced with all leather. Yes, the seats are ugly, but VERY comfortable once you sat in them.



User currently offlinePlanecrazy2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 615 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2849 times:

I'm just wondering, does anyone have any pictures of these wooly mammoth seats, and of the all leather seats for comparison?

-Planecrazy2

[Edited 2004-10-24 22:08:47]


United Airlines - Worldwide Service
User currently offlineGilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3047 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2585 times:

You can't beat UA's A319's on trans-con flights.

I flew them PHL-LAX and offered excellent service. Very comfortable aircraft for 5.5hr flight.


User currently offlineCOEWR2587 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 607 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2320 times:

No one ever seems to have any pics of AA's 767 interiors. I want to see what there F class seats look like.


Newark Airport...My Home Away From Home
User currently offlineQqflyboy From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2296 posts, RR: 13
Reply 17, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2201 times:

Although odd looking, those wooly mammoth seats are extremely comfy. If I ever had a complaint about them, it would be that they make you hot sometimes. But then again, leather does that, too. It is true, they are being replaced. It seems the material was no longer available to replace them.

I share the same complaint with others about the lack of cabin pics of AA. I suppose I better start carrying my digi around with me and start taking those pix. I'll try to be better about that.



The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
User currently offline777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 18
Reply 18, posted (10 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

Ask and ye shall receive...





User currently offlinePmg1704 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 162 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2097 times:

I don't know, looks kinda comfy to me.

I'd pay to sit in them!


User currently offlineVSLover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1897 posts, RR: 22
Reply 20, posted (10 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2048 times:

they are like sitting in one of those ugly plush recliners that mar your thoughtful decor!

you never really want to look at them, but they are oh so comfy!

the past 4 trips i've done between JFK-LAX have not had the wolly seats, but the newer leather seats. still super comfy.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA: A300 International Flagship Service posted Sun Mar 27 2005 05:34:03 by UnitedFirst
AA International Flagship Service posted Sat Jan 3 2004 07:55:36 by Aq737
AA Increases Hawaiian Flagship Service! posted Tue Sep 5 2000 17:52:13 by KKMolokai
Will AA China Service Prompt New Equipment? posted Wed Sep 6 2006 17:45:35 by 777lover
AA Increases Service To Bolivia posted Mon Jul 3 2006 00:52:35 by MAH4546
AA Inflight Service Latin America posted Tue Jun 27 2006 04:29:39 by Ualcsr
Is AA's Customer Service Representative Mistaken? posted Thu Apr 27 2006 21:32:11 by SkyHigh777
AA Customer Service Contacts? posted Sat Apr 1 2006 01:17:58 by Greg3322
AA J Class Service On Transcon (JFK-SFO)? posted Sat Feb 11 2006 15:43:33 by Eyeonthesky17
AA's DAL Service Schedule Released posted Tue Dec 13 2005 18:15:54 by LY4XELD