Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B747 Long Haul First Class  
User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3749 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 4142 times:

How important is this product to airlines like BA,QF,AF,SQ, are there a significant number of frequent first class passengers who definitely like this product and would fly on other airlines if it wasn't available to them rather than go on a B777 or A340?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDaumueller From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 690 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 4103 times:

a typical F-Class PAX doesn't care about the aircraft but about the airline.

If LH doesn't offer F-Class on 747, I go for A340. If they don't offer it on either, I go for another airline. That's at least my priority.

Class
Airline
Aircraft

Cheers,

Ben


User currently offlineKanebear From United States of America, joined May 2002, 953 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 4095 times:

On certain routes yes (LAX/JFK/ORD-LHR, LHR-SYD, LAX/JFK-HKG, SYD-LAX/JFK to name a few). F class is an absolute necessity with a tight schedule as it allows more privacy for sleep or work if necessary. J class is good but just doesn't get it done as well. Mind you I'm talking about tight schedule as in fly 19 hours, land, shower, change, go to a day's worth of meetings, return to the airport, fly elsewhere. Such a schedule can and does occur. My most recent trip requiring such travel was MIA-GRU-LHR-ORD with meetings that could NOT be re-arranged. In each case I overnighted on the planes, showered and changed at the airport (except GRU where I had to make use of a nearby hotel dayroom) and went on to my meetings. I sleep ok in J but sleep well in F. Without that rest, I wouldn'tve been at peak performance.

User currently offlineRtfm From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 417 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 4061 times:

Not sure I understand your query here... First in BA747 is the same as the 777 in terms of seat, service, etc; the only thing that is different is the layout because on the 747 First is downstairs in the nose as opposed to being behind the cockpit/galley on the 777. What difference does it make? Not much... and I know people who prefer the 777 layout vs the 747 (but let's face it, we're being kind of picky here..  Smile )

I guess people fly BA because they like their First product and/or are BA Exec club members so I would doubt many would switch to UA First on a 747 just because the BA flight was op by a 777...


User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 4054 times:

I'm mainly talking about nose cone main deck B747 First class in this thread.

User currently offlineFbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3706 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 15 hours ago) and read 4003 times:

I'm not a frequent F traveller like some people I know. A friend of the family splits his time between his houses in Cannes and the UK as well as his place of work in Essen, Germany (where he lives on weekdays) and also combines twice monthly trips to JNB in F.

Having spoken to him he couldn't really care less whether he is flying on a 747, 767, A340 or Sopwith Camel. He needs to get where he wants on time and in comfort which means F. His JNB trips are only a day long and so if he isn't in tip-top it isn't worth his time going down there.

For me I find dont' get the excitement on here about flying on a 777, 747 -400 or whatever. Especially when the service is identical on each flight. For me the only time I change my timetable depending on operating aircraft is when I fly to LHR-IAD. Preferably I'd take the morning BA flight however its a 777 which sucks in J in my opinion. Especially if you have a full flight the service goes down the pan and the 777 J cabin always feels so cramped because of 2-4-2 config. The BA223/293 in the afternoon is operated by a 747 and so I always for for this flight knowing that I can get upper deck. Less seats, better service, more private feel, side pods for hand luggage etc etc.



"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 14 hours ago) and read 3970 times:

Everyone has thier own opinions of course..... so here's mine!  Laugh out loud If I were to operate the 744 with a premium first class, I would operate it on the upper deck. Many poeple have emphasized how the upper deck has an intimate feel being in a smaller space. More one on one service. But that's just me.

Regards


User currently offlineFbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3706 posts, RR: 28
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 14 hours ago) and read 3950 times:

But flying in the nose of a 747 is sooo quiet. Ok so just switch on you NC headphones but having flown Upper deck and nose of BA 747s I'd prefer to keep F where it is. The privacy of the nose of a 747 is unmatched, seats 1A & K for example. Just look at photos on the database. You wouldnt' get that on the upper deck




"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
User currently offlineHardiwv From Brazil, joined Oct 2004, 8780 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 13 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

First is so immportant that BA will replace the 777 for the 747 to GRU. GRU is currently BA's 8th most lucrative First Class route in the world. Due to this specific demand for First Class in GRU, BA decided to replace aircraft to this destination. It shows that First Class on the 747 offers not only more seats, but is also preferred by travelers.

Hardi


User currently offlineFbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3706 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 12 hours ago) and read 3796 times:

Hardivw, the 777 and 747 on BA fleets both have 14 seats. But as you rightly say GRU is a very popular route for BA. A friend of mine goes down there regularly and says it is one of the worst for redemption bookings



"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
User currently offlineRtfm From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 417 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 10 hours ago) and read 3704 times:

Fbgdavidson - not quite; some BA777s have a 17F config; I think that they are the ones that op to the Middle-East destinations.

User currently offlineFbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3706 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 9 hours ago) and read 3687 times:

17F seats

First I have heard of it.....To the best of my knowledge BA operate only operate the one 14 seat config on the 777. With rows 1-3 with A,E,F,K seats and 4A and 4K

17 in F would not work because there is not enough room in the cabin for another 3 seats and BA would not redesign the seat for the sake of a few routes to the Middle East



"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
User currently offlineFbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3706 posts, RR: 28
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 2 hours ago) and read 3482 times:

I stand corrected. Apologies Rtfm.


"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
User currently offlineAcefreighter From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 10 months ago) and read 3411 times:

Incorrect I am afraid.

BA operate 3 777's in 17F config. They are G-ZZZA, B and C.
Although they were originally used for Middle East routes, they also operate on other routes including the USA and Canada east coast and Cairo for example.

The F Layout is 1A/EF/K, 2A/EF/K, 3A/K, 4A/EF/K, 5A/EF. Same seats laid out differently.

ZZB is op BA187 to EWR today in this layout.


User currently offlineIL76TD From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 289 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3342 times:

F is F, and honestly I don't care whether it is main deck F in a 744 or F in a 777. However I don't like the upper deck F on 747's (from any airline), if i wanted a cramped sloped-wall cabin i would have flown an airbus ha.

User currently offlineRtfm From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 417 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2368 times:

Fbgdavidson - no worries! Actually your post made me re-check - BA's website currently only shows one 777 config for First with 14F; I know I have flown on the 17Fs (to various Middle-East destinations) so glad that someone verified that there are some still in service....

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New OS Long-haul Business Class posted Tue Apr 25 2006 22:17:12 by Dean
Long Haul First? Jet Or Air Sahara? posted Wed Mar 30 2005 04:10:37 by 6thfreedom
Air France Long Haul Economy Class Service posted Mon Aug 23 2004 23:21:00 by AMS
Been On QF's New Long-haul Business Class Yet? posted Mon Sep 1 2003 11:00:49 by Motorhussy
Favourite Aircraft For Long Haul In Y Class? posted Thu Aug 21 2003 14:37:12 by Gulfair
NZ 744 Short-haul First Class posted Mon Jan 6 2003 23:23:02 by MattNZ
First Ever Commericial Long Haul Flight From DSA! posted Fri May 5 2006 13:11:24 by Dsa
First Choice Long Haul From Bristol posted Tue Apr 11 2006 14:01:45 by Gkirk
AF Business And Eco Class Long-haul Destinations? posted Wed Nov 16 2005 16:21:33 by Avianca
Short-haul Business Class On PER & BNE Long-hauls posted Sun Oct 16 2005 12:00:58 by QantasHeavy