Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Did Airbus Manage To Get The A345/6 So Heavy  
User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 5179 times:

Seems the Airbus A345 and A346 would be a very competitive product compared to the 773ER and 772LR......if they werent so damn heavy.

The 380Mtow A345 weighs 174.8t, thats roughly 30t more than the 772LR.

And the A346 weighs 181.9t, thats 14t more than the 773ER and even makes it heavier than the 744.

I guess partly the long and narrow fuselage must make the weight/seat ratio poor and also the combined weight of the four engines. But i've heard the A345/6 use more composites than the 777.

Seems that Airbus have shot themselves in the foot here, the A340's have great uplift but as so much of that is contributed to the OEW, all the advantages such as high payload/range are wasted.

Has Airbus considered ways of making these planes lighter?
Should they have maybe gone with a new 10-abrest design which covered the A345/6 and continued up to just below the A380?

[Edited 2004-10-28 20:12:31]

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRossyboy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 5140 times:

Perhaps they should put the same engines as the -300 series to make it lighter! Big grin

User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 5081 times:

If they put the -300 vacuum cleaner engines on the -600 that heavy thing wouldn't even reach the runway...  Wink/being sarcastic

I have always wondered why on hell the MTOW is almost 40t above the B773ER! Its weight is certainly one of the "heaviest" disadvantages compared to the B777.


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineTrident2e From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 5036 times:

Your post would read better if you were consistent with your weights and measures. Does the A346 weigh 181.9kgs or 181.9 tonnes? And the A345 must surely weigh more than 174.8kgs!

User currently offlineStealthpilot From India, joined May 2004, 510 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 4901 times:

he said "The 380Mtow A345 weighs 174.8t, thats roughly 30t more than the 772LR."
only confusing thig was Mtow... not MTOW. otherwise its 't' everywhere = tonnes.



eP007
User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4543 times:

I read in Flight International recently that weight reduction measures for the A345/6 have been an ongoing effort at Airbus, with most attention focussed on the wing. I agree it's peculiar these two models weigh that much more than a comparable performance 777; perhaps Airbus should direct its teams working on A380 weight reduction and designing the lighter A330-derived fuselage for the proposed 'A350' to parlay some of their work into these two models, as well. Getting the weight down is crucial for better operating economics; just raising MTOW to meet performance guarantees isn't enough because, all other things being equal, the heavier airplane will burn more fuel.

User currently offlineTrident2e From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4528 times:

Stealthpilot - he edited his post without acknowledging the fact. Originally, the weights he gave were wildly inaccurate.

User currently offlineAntares From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 1402 posts, RR: 39
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4508 times:

Now that the A345 is routinely flying for more than 19 hours with over 170 passengers and up to four tonnes of freight, one wonders what it could do if it was as lightweight on a pax/pax basis as the 777-300ER/-200LR are and will be.

I think the Boeing advantage in lighter weight design will become especially exciting in the e7s.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4352 times:

The 380Mtow A345 weighs 174.8t, thats roughly 30t more than the 772LR.

Well, yes, but that's without the auxiliary tanks installed on the 772LR.

The A340-500 has no provision for removing its tanks... they're all standard.

Airbus is diligently trying to lighten the airframe further... new control surfaces, the already lightened wing, and other improvements are bound to be along.

N


User currently offlineWIDEBODYPHOTOG From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 917 posts, RR: 67
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 4295 times:

Actually OEW on in service 777-300ER's are more like 387,000lbs(175,500kg) and A346 are 190,000kg. And at that OEW the A346 is heavier than any passenger 747-400 I have seen. It's fuel burn per hour is also closer to a 747-400 than it is to a 777-300ER.

If you want to look at it from a OEW per seat pov, using the factory numbers the 777-300ER is the clear winner there, and disparity is evident when you look at real aircraft that are actually in service.

The A346 is locked in kind of a spiral of sorts,weight increases fuel burn and on and on it goes. The wing structure is very heavy and has a narrow margin of optimum efficiency. It had to be made very strong, stiff and subsequently very heavy because of the high wing loads it has to routinely endure. 777-300ER and A346 have almost identical wing areas, but of course A346 has a much higher MTOW...you do the math.

Also as for 777-200LR. Right now it looks like it could pull off that SIN-EWR-SIN route with payloads of about 105,000lb Eastbound and 90-95,000lb Westbound. That about doubles what I've seen that SIA is getting on that route.

-widebodyphotog



If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 4282 times:

It's fuel burn per hour is also closer to a 747-400 than it is to a 777-300ER.

According to SAA's research, the 346 features a drastic reduction in fuel burn vs. the 744.

N


User currently offlineWIDEBODYPHOTOG From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 917 posts, RR: 67
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 4251 times:

SAA's A346's burn 3100lbs/hr more fuel than AF's 777-300ER's and 1900-2000lbs/hr less than it's own 747-400's. So fuel burn for A346 is closer to 747-400 than 777-300ER

-widebodyphotog



If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
User currently offlineLyzzard From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 404 posts, RR: 13
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 4021 times:

The A345 averages about 8 tons/hr in cruise, although less than a 747-400, it does carry a lot less than the jumbo.

As for the weight issues, I've also been wondering why it's so much heavier than a comparable 777-200. I can only guess the weight is from the extra fuel tanks (there are 3 tanks in each wing, in addition to 2 in the belly section and 1 trim tank in the tail), large crew rest compartment, extra landing gear, extra galley space (in SIA aircraft there are 3 galleys), and the additional heavier engines.


User currently offlineJeffrito From United States of America, joined May 2001, 133 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3881 times:

Airbi are a good deal though if you figure the $/ton purchase price!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Early Is Early To Get To The Airport? posted Tue Oct 10 2006 16:47:52 by B777A340Fan
How To Get The Miles? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 21:09:51 by SDWranglers
Mexicana To Get The Airbus 340-500 posted Tue Apr 26 2005 06:18:00 by Ghost77
How Is Airbus Going To Compete With The 7E7? posted Sat Jun 12 2004 02:25:55 by BoeingBus
How Did President Of France Get To US? posted Wed Sep 19 2001 15:19:40 by PolAir
Does Anyone Know How To Get The Chat To Work? posted Sun Jan 30 2000 01:16:32 by 747-600X
If US Were To Get The OS 332s? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 08:12:14 by Jdwfloyd
When Is AF Going To Get The A380? posted Mon Sep 11 2006 10:14:33 by Haggis79
How Do Airbus And Boeing Get Financed? posted Thu Apr 27 2006 09:39:35 by RootsAir
Did They Forget To Put The Gear Up? posted Tue Jan 3 2006 17:05:42 by HighFlyer9790