Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F9: Smaller Than Expected Loss, 737s Gone 4/05  
User currently offlineFlashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2903 posts, RR: 6
Posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1812 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well, I stand very much corrected. Frontier did much better than I predicted on another thread... and they beat the Wall Street analysts' expectations. They posted a net loss of $.06/share or ~$2 million. Their operating loss was about $600,000. Details at http://www.frontierairlines.com/news/articleDisplay.asp?article=/general/2004/pr_10282004.news.

Of note: they announced that the 737 fleet is history about 4 months early, on 4/11/05.

Quick stats:

Load Factor: Mainline-72.9%, jetExpress-74.5%, Overall-73.1%
Breakeven load factor for mainline: 73.4% (didn't break out jetExpress)

CASM (with Fuel): Mainline 8.03cents, jetEx-12.35cents, Overall-8.35cents
Yield per ASM: Mainline 7.84cents, jetEx-11.48cents, Overall-8.11cents

Mainline CASM excluding fuel: 6.16cents

Other notes: Mainline avg stage length is up about 12% or so. Avg mainline seats/departure off a bit. Mainline utilization up about 12%, just like they said it would be. 1.98 million passengers carried systemwide last quarter, up about 23% or so. 233,000 pax on jetExpress, or about 11% of passengers. (Doing this math in my head, pardon my miscalculations.  Big grin )

Overall, not a bad quarter for Frontier at all. Much, much better than I expected. Now, I want to hear how they've hedged for fuel going forward. Anyone know for sure? And, what routes get the ax when the 737s leave early?

[Edited 2004-10-29 04:17:04]

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25693 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1747 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Flashmeister:

The fuel hedge is both extremely simple and extremely sophisticated, all at the same time.

To put it in its simplest terms, Frontier took out a hedge for 25% of total fuel needs for (from memory) six months. It may have been nine months.

The average price was about $35 a barrel, but there is a price band. It is profitable (to Frontier) at over $38 per barrel and a loss maker if oil falls below (about) $32 a barrel.

It was taken out shortly after Frontier retained Solarc to manage their fuel. The drop in the price of oil (from about $40 to about $35) was unexpected and didn't last long. Since Frontier jumped in at that point, I have to assume it was Solarc's doing.

As to the quarter, even as a loyal Frontier supporter, I was very surprised at how small the loss was. Like the Wall Street analysts, I was expecting a bigger loss.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A380 Delay Costs Higher Than Expected posted Fri Jul 28 2006 00:32:37 by Katekebo
FR Posts 'better Than Expected' Profit. posted Tue Aug 2 2005 13:07:34 by 7LBAC111
Alitalias 2004 Losses Worse Than Expected posted Thu May 26 2005 21:57:19 by AirWales
A380 Fuel Burn Better Than Expected posted Wed May 25 2005 08:41:11 by Jacobin777
Snba Posts Better Than Expected 1st Q Results posted Fri Jun 11 2004 13:35:28 by Scorpio
JetBlue Reports Better-Than-Expected 1Q Profits posted Thu Apr 22 2004 23:19:41 by Jetbluefan1
A345 Performance Better Than Expected posted Mon Apr 21 2003 23:30:32 by Spaceman
SN BA Achieves Better Than Expected Results posted Tue Mar 25 2003 14:19:43 by Luchtzak
A318 Smaller Than 737-100 posted Wed Jan 16 2002 15:00:10 by UAL1837
Cockpit Windows On A 747 Smaller Than Other Ac? posted Sat Dec 15 2001 04:06:49 by B747ca