Cory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2686 posts, RR: 6 Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5024 times:
Even if B6 wanted to come to EWR, where would they get the gates from? CO snatched up every available gate in Terminal A in order to prevent new entrants from coming in (and to provide business pax with quick access to the gates), and everywhere else is maxxed out.
B6FA4ever From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 816 posts, RR: 12 Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4890 times:
i think LGB-MCO would be a good addition to our route map. we actually have quite a few PAX who connect in JFK from OAK/LGB to MCO and having a one-stop/non-stop to MCO through LGB would be so much more convenient for the pax.
and in regards to the 190's new cities...just like Luv2fly said...no airline would announce a new city more than 6 months in advance. when we announced service to PHX, it was less than 3 months from the announcement to the launch flight.
i'd say for '05 just add a cpl new cities and focus MORE on connecting the dots and adding the frequencies (as we've seen already for spring w/ addt'l ONT and MSY flights from JFK and more BOS-LGB/OAK)!
BOS2LAF From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 368 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4854 times:
I doubt that MHT will see B6 for a long time simply because of the very strong presence of WN there. WN leases 6 out of 17 gates at MHT, and all gates are currently leased by other airlines. Now, if one of the airlines serving MHT went belly-up (i.e. US DL or DH), then I could see the possibility of B6 coming in and taking the vacant gates. Then again, there is no MHT-JFK service... The only NY area service is CO to EWR and DL and US to LGA and service to JFK would offer connecting opportunities. Maybe it is a possibility in the distant future for a small presence there like a few JFK flights daily when gate space becomes available. I suppose they could share a gate with another airline, but I'm not sure of what gates are underused.
If I seem scatterbrained, you'll have to excuse me, I'm taking a break from writing a long paper and my brain is a little fried right now.
Ramerinianair From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1486 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4694 times:
Is the ISP still a roomer??
I don't think they will just start service to FLL. It's kind of against their concept to serve ISP with only one route. FLL nor ISP is a hub or focus city for them. I could see them taking over the AA gates. The only thing is that they do not have jetways. There is also a shortage of gate space- especially if they are going to load an A320!
I think if the do ISP, it will be ISP- FLL and MCO at least.
They also stated a while ago that the Embraers will replace the A320s so that they can use the A320s on other routes that need the longer range A/C.
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2849 posts, RR: 14 Reply 18, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4712 times:
According to JetBlue's CEO, they'll only be opening 2 new 320 stations this year before the 190's come in. My guesses are:
I said PDX b/c there is very little if any competition on the route, and JetBlue could get some excellent yields out of there. I said MIA b/c there is also not too much competition on that direct route (only one airline serves it - AA), and JetBlue has been doing very well on both JFK-FLL and LGA-FLL.
On the other hand, I really would not be surprised to see B6 starting ISP-FLL and ISP-MCO. Both routes do excellently out of JFK and I'm sure JetBlue would like to capture some traffic out on the Eastern/Suffolk County side of the island.
With that, I think B6's first E190 destination will be Richmond followed by GSO or JAX, followed by BOS-Upstate NY.
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
AirplaneBoy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 548 posts, RR: 10 Reply 23, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4637 times:
I wish for LAX....They serve ONT- but it caters more to the Inland Empire/Riverside areas. LGB is slot restricted, and people from as far as San Diego (even though B6 flies to SAN) drive to LAX just to fly domestically. The benefits of flying from LAX would be that it's closer to a larger population of people than ONT .... and gates would not be hard to find. Of course, trying to obtain many gates at once probably wont be possible, finding one or two to use isn't too hard. The terminal I work in has several periods in a day where it's absolutely silent and the gates are not occupied.
Flynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 24, posted (9 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4601 times:
Norfolk, VA (ORF) or Newport News, VA (PHF), since they both serve the same metro area. There's competition from AE, FL, and WN to cities including BOS, JFK, LGA, MCO, and LAS. I know they would instantaneously become my preferred airline, as I fly home to MCO often, from PHF and ORF. I'd even take a connection thru BOS or JFK to get to Florida.
25 Flairport: my guess is that there will be no new cities/routes announced until at least Janruary... The reason: They are adding many flights this winter to Flori
26 JetMarc: Our CEO said we'd only open 2 cities for 2004 and we opened... what? 7? I hope we'll add more transcons from LGB and OAK. My friend that works in PHX
27 NWADC9: Isn't one of the 190 cities also gonna be PIT after US dies in a few years? *crosses fingers*
28 BOEING747-700: Well from what I was told from a person who works for Jetblue in New York back in July, said that YYZ is on their list and would probably see them in
29 Rampero: The next at the caribbean are: BQN - JFK seasonal extra section (Dec) BQN - FLL if Pan Am cease his ops at bqn And JFK-PSE-JFK (Ponce ,Puerto Rico sec
30 Kcrwflyer: "Detroits newest and northern point airport...FNT..Flint safe" Flint wont work as NW will start FNT-JFK, charging 1$ per ticket and operating the rout
31 MAH4546: I don't think they will just start service to FLL. It's kind of against their concept to serve ISP with only one route. FLL nor ISP is a hub or focus
32 WJA73G: With their proposed next quarter loss I doubt they'll want to expant much more for the next little while.. ...Just my 2 cents... WJA73G
33 MAH4546: With their proposed next quarter loss I doubt they'll want to expant much more for the next little while.. You don't halt expansion just because you m
34 Blackhawk144: BOI? I Doubt it. I somehow doubt we'll get any B6 service, but if we do it'll be an EMB. But there is No one who serves BOI-NYC, and it's in our Top 2
35 Hz747300: The new route will be LGB-SAD with a E190. There is no competition on the route! I think if they start hitting the Canadian market, they will strike b
36 Blackhawk144: Hz747300, Sorry, but what airport is SAD? Anthony
37 Hz747300: Sorry, but what airport is SAD? Anthony Safford, Arizona
38 Mikey711MN: Anyone think they'll take an opportunity to muddy the waters in the MDW gates situation by doing some bidding...?
39 Ckfred: Does B6 have any interest in bidding on the 14 gates that TZ is getting rid of at MDW? I know that B6 has stated that it would prefer to start service