Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747 With 3 Engines Takes Off From Detroit  
User currently offlineDayflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 15166 times:

I saw a 747 with only 3 engines (2 on one wing, 1 on the other) take off from DTW last week. The name of the airline started with "E". Is this the plane that lost an engine over lake Michigan last week? Where would it be going? How can this aircraft be allowed to fly with 3 engines? I would think it would be safer to ferry in an engine than to fly the airplane?


One Nation Under God
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetjeanes From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1431 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14993 times:

I think it was one of kallettas junk, but I would imagine it was permited to ferry back to yip which is close by. That plane is going to require more than just an engine, There is major damage to the wing,and the other engine looked to me out of whack...


i can see for 80 miles
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14926 times:

Lots of multiengine airplanes can be flown on ferry flights with one (in some cases more) engines inoperative. You will not see this done on revenue flights, obviously. The DC-10 and MD-11 can be two-engine ferried, for example, as well. 747's, DC-8's, 707's, not sure about 727's...you get the drift.

Obviously it's subject to a different set of checks, balances, and regulations, but if all the t's are crossed and i's are dotted then it's perfectly legal.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineJetjeanes From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1431 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14879 times:

Did you see the 747 that had 3 engines on one wing... it was ferrying another engine i guess to another a/c. it wasnt funtional but sure as hell looked odd


i can see for 80 miles
User currently offlineOkie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3064 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14839 times:

Sort of off topic but here is an attempted 2 engine ferry flight of an MD-11F recently.
Did not have very good results.


http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20041020X01664&key=1


Okie


User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2439 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14809 times:

Lots of multiengine airplanes can be flown on ferry flights with one (in some cases more) engines inoperative.

I think that Dayflyer is talking about one engine missing, not inoperative.
This has been done before with the 747. Removing one engine eliminates weight and reduces drag.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Norman Gage






Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineClipper002 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 679 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14761 times:

The FAA will permit 2 or 3 engine ferries, but there are a lot more checks that have to be accomplished for this to happen. The first is that all of the remaining engines must pass a boroscope. Only certain pilots are permitted to fly a/c with less than all engines operating. As far as I'm concerned, you should always try to fly the engine to the plane, not the plane to the engine. We've lost a whole lot of big bucks when 275 sat on its' tail last month up in ANC. As for seeing 3 engines on one wing, the third engine is called a "fifth pod". Both the 707 and 747 have been approved to operate this way. It's a good way to transport your engines around but also quite expensive do to the additional drag.

There was also a remark that one of the engines "looked out of whack" whatever that is. Believe me, those 3 remaining engines all have to be operating in perfect synch before that plane is released to fly.

Ed



Ed
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2934 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14644 times:

That was Kalitta's bird. They 3 engine ferried it back to their maintainence base in Oscoda, MI last week..


The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4204 posts, RR: 37
Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 14343 times:

That was a Kalitta Air 747 that dropped one of it's engines into lake michigan a week ago.

The photographer of that 3 engine ferry a few pictures above happens to be assistant chief pilot for Kalitta.



Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10748 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days ago) and read 14206 times:

Interesting is that the aircraft without engine no.3 in the photo above is the same as the one that now lost no.1!
Seems it has the attitude of being a Trijet!


User currently offlineEnviroTO From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 825 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days ago) and read 13881 times:

Those pylons don't look like they are in very good condition. Is that dirt on the pylons or are they rusting out?

User currently offlineJrMafia90 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 11 months 5 days ago) and read 13720 times:

In that photo it said the engine was being carried to the destination on the main deck. Isn't that were the passengers are? I would love to see a picture of that.

User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12113 posts, RR: 49
Reply 12, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13670 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Kalitta Air 747 operate as freighters, so no pax.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineJrMafia90 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13520 times:

Oh thanks, I figured that but I wasn't sure.

User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7496 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13342 times:

Read the caption for this shot......

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ryan Gaddis - SPOT THIS!




'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineDayflyer From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13173 times:

That was Kalitta's bird. They 3 engine ferried it back to their maintainence base in Oscoda, MI last week..


Thanks to Spacepope and other contributors. I learned many things!



One Nation Under God
User currently offlineVikingair From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13159 times:

Also there were some DC-8's that had the ability to pod an engine between the #2 engine and the fuselage...When the Emery DC-8 landed in SWF years ago and clipped the tail off a ABX DC-9 on the runway that DC-8 flew out of SWF on 3 engines. That is to say #1 engine was completely removed for the special ferry flight for maintenance.

User currently offlineRamerinianair From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 9508 times:

If you read the caption to the first pic posted . . . you'll find out that this isn't that odd of an operation for katlitta! They had to 3 engine ferry a 741 in that pic too.
I think they need to get serious with their mx!!!!
SR



W N = my Worst Nightmare!!!!!
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 18, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 9490 times:

We've lost a whole lot of big bucks when 275 sat on its' tail last month up in ANC.

I missed that?

I work there and didn't hear a thing about it.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2147 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 9282 times:

Did they ever find that Kalitta engine yet?

User currently offlineB4real From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2646 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 9144 times:

Here's the opposite, a a/c ferrying an engine to another bird


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Don Boyd




B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlineMUC-PIX From Germany, joined Aug 2002, 178 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 8766 times:

UAL Bagsmasher: Yes, local people found it, note this topic:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1787756/


User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 7976 times:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1787756/



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12189 posts, RR: 18
Reply 23, posted (9 years 11 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 7497 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

I don't like the look of the engine holder in the B741 photo. The B741 is a SP freighter.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
First Thai 777-200ER Takes Off! With Pics posted Tue Oct 24 2006 12:55:29 by Qantas744ER
Strange 747 With B52 Style Engines... posted Wed Jul 5 2006 20:15:59 by Magyarorszag
4 Engine A/C Takes Off On 3 Engines W/pax? posted Fri Apr 1 2005 05:49:24 by Bohica
747-200 With 5 Engines? posted Tue Jun 24 2003 01:16:49 by Bigmo747
A 747 With GE 90 Engines? posted Tue Dec 25 2001 18:36:11 by GF-A330
China Airlines 747 Takes Off On Wrong Runway posted Thu May 31 2001 14:41:05 by Singapore_Air
Virgin 747 With Fire Engines At LGW Last Sunday? posted Mon Apr 23 2001 15:26:13 by 777kicksass
Alaska Airlines Takes-off On Wrong Runway In Ksea posted Wed Nov 1 2006 17:19:16 by Amwest2United
Air Atlanta 747 With Different Blue Tail Question posted Mon Oct 9 2006 18:10:12 by MIAMIx707
LH A343 GRU-MUC Takes Off posted Fri Sep 15 2006 09:49:53 by Hardiwv