Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CRJ100 Vs. CRJ200  
User currently offlineErj145lr From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 431 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2780 times:

What is the difference between the crj100 and the crj200; in size, age, fleets, engines, etc...?

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2747 times:

I think the only differance is a minor engine upgrade and an increased landing weight..


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineGordon Werner From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 20 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2556 times:

they are externally identical

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2446 times:

OK, here we go...

Engines:
100- GE CFM34-3A1
200- GE CFM34-3B1

Range:
100- 980nm
200- 2005nm

Empty Weight:
100- 29,180lbs
200- 30,292lbs

Max TO Weight:
100- 47,450lbs
200- 53,000lbs



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineNwafflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1050 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2433 times:

Lovely planes, but -- too cramped for more than a 40 minute flight -- and absolutely awful on a "long" flight, i.e.,, DTW - BGR -- the SAAB is a much more comfortable plane. I've tried every row -- 1 on back, and there just plain isn't enough space between the seats -- always getting shoved out into the aisle (where I trip the flight attendant). Worst case though is a window seat -- I just cannot shove out the side of the aircraft, no matter how hard I try

User currently offlineAC330 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2358 times:

The don't mind the CRJ, but I am 6'2 and at the window seat you have to put your head at a 90 degree angle to your body inorder to see out....thats the only thing I don't like...the windows seem too low. I prefer the Dash 8.

AC330


User currently offlineEjmmsu From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1692 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2300 times:

The window seat on the CRJ is killer. I flew DFW-JFK on ASA, and my back hurt for two days. The window is much too low, and the fusalage bears into the leg room. It feels like you are mashed into the side of the plane. The aisle seat on the way back was much better.


"If the facts do not conform to the theory, they will have to be disposed of"
User currently offlineCO2BGR From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 558 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2292 times:

I had the unfurtunate situation in having to sit in a window seat on a CRJ BGR-DTW (just the route you mentioned nwafflyer) 2 hrs and 20 minutes. I much prefer window seats. I am only 5'10" and the window was much too low. The Mesaba Avro on the way back was much nicer. Try the CRJ BGR-MSP as that was a summer seasonal route for NW on the crjs. I prefer the 1-2 seating on the ERJ much better. I also agree that the Saabs are awesome aircraft.

I wonder if canadair could make the CRJ-200 with the window placement of the 700s and 900s because those 6 inches make a world of difference.



There are too many self indulgent weiners in this town with too much bloody money" Randal Raines- Gone in 60 Seconds
User currently offlineAC330 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2252 times:

I am so glad to know that I am not the only person who has thought the window is too low on the CRJ! I fly on AC's Dash 8's and CRJ's every 2 weeks and as far as comfort goes, I prefer the dash 8. CRJ Aisle is okay, but overall the Dash 8 I find much roomier.

AC330


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2223 times:

Never done the CRJ, but last Friday I flew window seat in a Dash 8 for the first time. Window was just in the right spot it seemed like although the engine was in the way right up until we flew over downtown Denver at around 8pm and I had an awesomely unabstructed view  Smile

User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

Bombardier addressed the window problem and corrected it on the CR7 and CR9. The CR1 and CR2 were derived from the highly-reliable Challenger Biz jets where seats were a little lower and better places. It simply was not designed for "commercial" flight.. However, the CR7 and CR9 were totally redesigned in terms of passenger comfort, and also the slow climb rate was abolished with the new CF34-8C1 engines. Can anybody say "Rocket"

Yes, the original CRJ was a bastard child and was Bombardiers way of saying "Hey, Look at us, we make airplanes too." Now that the CRJ proved popular, they had some time to design better planes that are much more comfortable for passengers. Including you 6 footers.  Big grin

So if you wanna fly a CRJ, try the CRJ-700 or CRJ-900

See the Difference???


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Daniel Wojdylo
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tomi Kunej

CRJ-200 is the first one, and the CRJ-700 is the second one.. But this is one of my personal favorites...
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Dopson - AirTeamImages

The flowers and newness give it a nice touch.


User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2093 times:

Guys,

And the next question is: what is the difference (MTOW and range) between CRJ100, 100ER and 100LR (some sources say, 100 and 100ER are the same thing, only LR is a different one)? What are AC CRJ100s (in particular, C-FSKE, c/n 7065)? Our photo database calls some of them 100s, some others 100ERs… Are they really not the same?

Thank you!


User currently offlineAlasdaironeil From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 93 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

I flew a crj 200 i think, lufthansa.

I thought it was very comfortable, using the window seat. However, i'm not the tallest of people so i can understand that many people find it a bit cramped.

Very cosy for shorter people as myself though.  Laugh out loud

There is a diffeence between 100 and 100ER.

100 has a max take off weight of 21,523kg, 100ER is 23,133kg, and 2,582 litres of additional fuel load.

Alasdair.



失去在翻譯 - Lost in Translation
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CRJ900 Vs. CRJ200 posted Wed Feb 8 2006 07:09:54 by HPLASOps
Different Emergency Exit Procedure CRJ100 Vs 700? posted Sun Jun 24 2001 13:17:17 by Airsicknessbag
A358 Vs A351x Numbers Don't Make Any Sense posted Mon Dec 11 2006 20:18:25 by Clickhappy
KE Vs OZ posted Mon Dec 11 2006 03:48:40 by ORDagent
BA, VS, 9W - BOM-LHR Convenient? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 06:15:17 by B773ER
VS + CM, Is There Something Going On? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 20:57:15 by 2travel2know
B6 Vs The Legacies In Their Own Hubs posted Fri Dec 8 2006 01:16:22 by GoBlue
Here We Go: LH Longhaul 2nd Round A350 Vs 787 posted Thu Dec 7 2006 22:01:48 by Columba
Raked Wingtips Vs. Blended Winglets posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:33:11 by Iloveboeing
VS 009 On 20th December And VS 744's PE Seat posted Wed Dec 6 2006 21:44:45 by PlaneMad