Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA To Increase Yvrlhr To 10 Weekly  
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4976 posts, RR: 51
Posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3386 times:

Good news for YVR!

BA will increase YVRLHR from 7 to 10 weekly 744's

BA will downgauge YYZLHR 2nd trip from 744 to 772.. and the 3rd YYZLHR trip will go from 4 weekly to 3 weekly 772... 777 service features no F class

BA will keep YUL constant with a daily 772 no F.



21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4766 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3370 times:

Since when did BA withdraw First class from its B 772ER fleet? Why did they do it?

User currently offlineSpyderz From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 651 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3279 times:

I assume the YVR upgrade is just for the summer season. Anyways it'll be good to see since Air Canada usually flies YVR-LHR 3xdaily during the summer with 330's and 763's. Also a bit suprised that the upgrade came with 744's instead of 772's. Anyways the extra flights will be most welcomed since during the summer all the flights are usually full. Unfortunately, the same thing cannot be said about LHR-YYZ flights, albiet they're probably higher yielding.

User currently offlineDYK From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

This does not surprise me as this route is almost impossible to get a seat during the summer months. British Airways has been talking about this for the last few years, thought they would have gone double daily. We just have to wait for Lufthansa on what they will do on the YVr-MUC route, rumour is the will go daily on this route for summer 2005.


AC,CP,PW,WD,ND,UA,AA,NW,CO,DL,WA,AS,QX,PR,SQ,AI,TG,MH,JL,9W,IC,UL,PG,BW,NZ,QF,DJ,BA,LH,KL,OA,OS,ME,RJ,HA,AQ
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4766 posts, RR: 43
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3162 times:

Its worth mentioning that not all the YVR-LHR-YVR traffic for Air Canada is O&D traffic...there are many passengers on the plane that (around 40-60 per flight) who are passengers of EK-QR-GF-AI-UL-KU-RJ-SV-TK etc who have commercial agreements with AC for the LHR-CANADA-LHR routes which include LHR-YUL/YYZ/YOW/YVR/Calgary/Edmonton.

These pax change airlines at LHR after flying trans-atlantic on AC.


User currently offlineAirbusfanYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2002, 1434 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3127 times:

Marc,

BA's second daily to YYZ is currently a 772.

Cheers,
Kaz

[Edited 2004-11-05 05:07:47]


t.dot photography
User currently offlineDavidyyc From Canada, joined Sep 2004, 238 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3106 times:

Any news on a BA LHR-YYC-LHR route. That route is also very busy and AC has the monopoly now (apart from charters) ?

User currently offlineDYK From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3098 times:

Davidyyc
In the CTA website it show British Airways applying for code share with American ORD-YYC effective December 2004 to December 2007. So I am assuming they no plans to serve YYC during this period?



AC,CP,PW,WD,ND,UA,AA,NW,CO,DL,WA,AS,QX,PR,SQ,AI,TG,MH,JL,9W,IC,UL,PG,BW,NZ,QF,DJ,BA,LH,KL,OA,OS,ME,RJ,HA,AQ
User currently offlineJayce From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 520 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3074 times:

This is great news for YVR! DYK- I heard LH is cancelling YVR-MUC next summer, hopefully you're right and I'm wrong.




"Trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson
User currently offlineConnector4you From Canada, joined May 2001, 932 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3049 times:

For some reason it's way more expensive to fly from Vancouver direct non-stop to Europe than to Asia ?

Fly anywhere to Asia ? No problem FABULOS deals (note to yourself: get one of those soon !)

Fly to Europe NO SEATS, EXPENSIVE, rerouting trough Toronto and Montreal, poor service and bad connecting times beyond major European hubs except perhaps KLM though Amsterdam.

I would welcome BA's three additional weekly service provided that their flight arrives on time before or around 8:00 AM at LHR.



User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4766 posts, RR: 43
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3029 times:

Connector4u...obviously YVR-ASIA flights will be cheaper than YVR-EU flights because ALL the major carriers of Far East Asia fly to YVR on a daily and some multiple daily times including AC-CX etc.

For EU, you only have BA-LH-AC-KLM competing where as for Asian routes you have CX-OZ-KE-ANA-JAL-BR-CI-SQ-some Chinese based airlines I think...supply surpasses demand on the YVR-ASIAN routes where as it doesnt on the YVR-UK/EU route where demand usually outstrips supply hence you see higher fares for same distance flights to EU than on Asian routes of similar flying time.

No one in their right mind would fly to YYC via ORD with the hassle and inconvienience of US Customs & Immigration...yes I do feel that BA would do very well out of YYC with 4 weekly to daily B 777-200ERs. Lot of high yield oil executives from YYC can use BA to fly via LHR to oil cities in Africa and the Middle East.

Im still waiting for the day when a true successor to Canadian Airlines is found which would give AC serious competition on its key YVR-Asian and YVR-EU/UK routes.


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3011 times:

Behramjee, think and verify your facts because you rush to spit them all out. And why do you fancy using "-" to separate between subjects, didn't they teach you in English class that comma should be the right one used instead? It just gets annoying after reading your posts.

OZ and NH do not serve YVR, they only code-share into YVR with AC. CX is the only one with year-round double daily (excluding the YYZ stopover). Few Asian carriers into YVR have daily flights e.g. JL (only in the summer months do they have 10x weekly, ie. double daily on some days) but 2 of which continue onto MEX. CA has daily but only during the summer, same with CI. Many fail to secure rights for additional flights and only in the summer do they get to add an extra flight, e.g. KE or BR.

These flights are too very crowded during peak season needless to say and from time to time remain packed during off-peak times. I'm sure same goes to those flights heading for Europe. I can't agree that supply surpasses demand for the Asian flights because they are pretty hard to get booked on to, and you have to book way in advance for travel during holidays. Just thought I'd say that my flights YVR-LHR vv on BA at the end of last month were barely full, both ways. So any additional capacity could well be only seasonal.

As to why the fares are more expensive on the shorter sectors, I would only say it is because of less competition and somehow supply and demand is a factor but I would not regard as the major one.

Example of airlines offering direct scheduled flights to Asia and onwards connections from YVR:
CX, JL, AC, CI, BR, KE, SQ, MU, PR, CA

To Europe:
AC, BA, KL, LH


User currently offlineWheelsatc From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2981 times:

Airbus Lover - you do not regard supply and Demand as a major factor??
You obviously do not no much about business then!


User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4502 posts, RR: 72
Reply 13, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2959 times:

We just have to wait for Lufthansa on what they will do on the YVr-MUC route, rumour is the will go daily on this route for summer 2005.

Lufthansa's return on the MUC-YVR route is still very much up in the air. They have loaded a preliminary version of their 2005 Summer Operations into the CRS and so far there is no sign of MUC-YVR returning. MUC-YUL, on the other hand is loaded to be daily with A343 equipment.

As for BA, I thought this is not the first time they reinforce summer operations into YVR. I seem to remember them doing the same thing a couple of years ago. At that time, they also increased operations into SEA for the summer from daily to 10 weekly flights.



User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2808 times:

Wheelsatc, read carefully! I was saying it is not the major factor in respect to the comparison of airfares between YVR-Europe and YVR-Asia but more of the competition. I never ruled it out as a factor.

Both routes' demand surpasses supply during peak times and fares sour high as compared to low season and this is the case everywhere. But as to why flights to Europe are more than expensive than that to Asia regardless of time of the year, I'd say it's because of competition. In a way also more competition = more options = higher supply, but you really can't say there's lots of supply of service to say PVG from YVR when not all those airlines serve PVG or have convenient connections. So looking from an origin to destination analysis however, you should see that passengers do have lots of options and less convenient schedules have lower fares etc. There is hardly oversupply of seats to Asia from YVR and yet fares are still cheaper.


User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2744 times:

Behramjee: BA have not removed the FIRST cabin from all 777s. There is, however, a small fleet configured with 36 fully-flat, Club World seats, 24 World Traveller seats, and 214 World Traveller seats. These planes fly to destinations where yields don't warrant the F cabin, such as PEK, YUL, YYZ, CCU, etc.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineAC345 From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2727 times:

Airbus-Lover, since you're so good at English and at lecturing Behramjee, maybe you should know that fares can and do indeed soar high sometimes, but they definitely do not "sour high" ever. I hope you do know that saying about people in glass houses.

That being said, yey for YVR. The more the merrier. Maybe KLM will upgrade their service to 777 sometime soon. Not next summer though, it will be again th MD11.


User currently offlineGuyBetsy1 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 840 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2700 times:

It is a known fact that Transpacific fares are always lower than Transatlantic fares from Canada if comparing miles equivalent.

User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2678 times:

AC345, go on, pick on typos. And I really do understand the saying of people living in glass houses, such as yourself. "It will be again th MD11"?!  Insane

Nothing beats Behramjee's love for hyphens though.  Wink/being sarcastic

Let me get back on the topic now. We have many airlines flying into YVR, such as CX-JAL-AC-CI-EVA-KE-SQ-MU-PR-CA on YVR-ASIA-YVR flights while we have BA-LH-KLM flying YVR-EUROPE-YVR flights. They fly from cities such as HKG/NRT/TPE/ICN in ASIA and AMS/LHR/FRA in EU. Some flights are operated by B 777-200ERs and B 747-400s. Seating capacity in average is 300-400 seats. Big grin


User currently offlineAC345 From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2626 times:

Wow, Airbus Lover, you gave me a taste of my own medicine and it is bitter. Get a life (a real one), little man.

User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4766 posts, RR: 43
Reply 20, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2580 times:

Airbus Lover...I dont know if you've worked in an airline but I have for the past 3 summers in Cathay Pacific.

In CX, I have handled reservations, sales and marketing and whenever in reservations a msg had to be sent out concerning 2-3 different airlines or even a route structure it should used to be like HKG-LAX-JFK on CX-AA and not CX, AA nor CX & AA nor CX + AA!!!

As for my english capabilities, since you're from Malaysia I dont know if you've heard of Cambridge University Exams called A Levels and O Levels but if u have then in O Level Cambridge Univ exam I got 88% in English and A Levels (which is of a higher standard) I got 91%  Smile ...so I wouldnt doubt my English language capabilities and form of writing.

The reason why I write - instead of , is because thats how we do it in CX.

If you think thats funny then it just shows your immaturity !!!


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2527 times:

So it seems although I'm much younger than you, I too have had internships with airlines before, namely MAS, twice for two 'sessions'.  Big grin

Your inconsistency was more like using 2 letter IATA code then ICAO later. I doubt CX does that. At most they will all be in 2 letter IATA code.

Yes I do know of the GCSE exams, I actually did the IGCSE and scored slightly better than you in O levels  Laugh out loud However, I did not take the A level exams as my school at that year switched to offer IB instead.

Reading your posts ever since you joined, it's really funny how you called me immature. The term AC345 used would be perfect here. The content of your posts are often irrelevant and/or of poor factual value except that they seem like written by someone trying hard to pretend he knows everything very well when in fact what this person said isn't even right to start off with.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA To Increase Yvrlhr To 10 Weekly posted Thu Nov 4 2004 23:16:25 by FLYYUL
BA Wants To Increase Frequencies To Luanda posted Tue Nov 7 2006 01:01:19 by B777A3330
TP To Increase LIS-NAT From 5x To 6x Weekly posted Mon Jul 10 2006 20:34:06 by LipeGIG
AA To Increase GIG-MIA To 12x Weekly posted Thu Jun 29 2006 19:11:51 by LipeGIG
IB Increases MAD-GRU To 10 Weekly A343/A346 posted Fri Feb 24 2006 10:31:54 by Hardiwv
EU: Pilot Retirement Age At BA To Increase posted Thu Dec 15 2005 10:01:37 by Scotron11
AA To Increase Flights To Brazil To 52/weekly posted Tue Nov 22 2005 16:51:20 by LipeGIG
BA To Increase Direct India Flights posted Tue Nov 15 2005 00:13:57 by Garri767
BA To Increase Its Service To Bermuda In 2006 posted Tue Nov 1 2005 21:29:04 by Columbia107
BA To Increase Flights To LAX posted Fri Jun 4 2004 19:27:51 by Soups