Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Speculation: A Dassault 3-engined RJ  
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1910 times:

Hi folks....
Being a huge fan of the trijet (727, DC-10, L-1011, etc) I was wondering if should Dassault ever decides to get into the RJ market, could they design a 3-engined RJ around their 7X, 900 & 2000 bizjet? Or would the cabin of these 3 models be too narrow to be useful for a 2-2 layout? What would the pro's & cons be for a 3-engined RJ? All replies, opinions & smart-assed comebacks welcomed.  Wink/being sarcastic Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3207 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1894 times:

I love tri-jets myself... i think they are the most interesting and classy looking designs, but

an RJ would be used for fairly short trips. Im not sure their would be too many advantages to the trijet design in this case. It did work for the BAe-146, but one could argue in many ways, the BAe-146-300 didn't as well as it could have because it hard a hard time competiting with DC-9-30s and B737-200s. The clear advantage the BAe146 had was its very short take off and landing ability.

Maybe this is the angle you could market a tri-jet rj on? Unfortunately, it is going to be a long time before if ever, we see something like the good old 727 produced again. I think the tri-jet's design best hope is still for long-haul flights.

Here's a thought. The 777 and A380 will have similar engines. Not quite but sort of in the same way the 767, MD-11 and 744 have similar engines. How about a trijet 450 seater using RR trents, or the other 777 engines? Ultra long range, so its ETOPS free, yet less maintenance than a quad, and should be able to get off shorter runways that the 777-300.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

Trijets just don't make sense under ANY circumstances at this point.

N


User currently offlineTheiler From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 633 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1851 times:

The cabin of the 900 or 2000 series aircraft would not be near large enough for regional jet use, especially if overhead bins were to be included.

Such an aircraft would essentially need to be completely re-engineered, to include more cabin space (longer), baggage storage space, etc.

No Falcon design (50,900,2000) has an overly long airframe.


User currently offlineNW7E7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 533 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1843 times:

It would be cool to see how they would do in the commercial RJ market..3 engined or 2 engined. There is a huge completion center for Dassault here in LIT and I can't wait to see the 7X!! With a length almost the same size as a CRJ2, a wingspan 11 feet shorter than a 732, and a range comparable with a 777-200, it will be one hell of a business jet.
http://www.dassaultfalcon.com/7x/


User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26426 posts, RR: 76
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1752 times:

Um, the 777 has much more powerful engines than the A380. Quite frankly, ETOPS has killed the long haul trijet and cost cutting has killed the short haul trijet


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1743 times:

To be honest I would be surprised if Dassault hasn't looked at the RJ market ditto for gulfstream. But then decided that it was outside their core market.

I don't think a 2000 or 900 based fram would be that tight of fit.

ERJ's don't exactly have wide cabins either.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1731 times:

Ultra long range, so its ETOPS free, yet less maintenance than a quad, and should be able to get off shorter runways that the 777-300.

Meant to respond to this earlier.

Mx on a trijet is way more difficult than on a quad.

N


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9623 posts, RR: 68
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1717 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

this idea is over 10 years old.

Dassault explored a RJ based on the 50/900 and choose not to pursue it.


User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

The Falcon 2000 is not a tri jet, just the 50 and 900.

How many people can the 900 carry now?

As much as I would love to see a commercial trijet flying again, i don't think it is exactly economical and I don't think anyone would go for it. Probably the same reason the Avro 4 engine RJs didnt sell much and the ARJX totally bombed and put the Avro company out of business.


User currently offlineSLCPilot From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1540 times:

ClickHappy,

This idea was explored 30 years ago! It even got to the hardware stage. It is a little known fact that Dassault built a Falcon 30 in the early 70s.

It was to be an "RJ" in every sense of the word. It had 30 seats and was to be followed by the Falcon 40, which was never built. The airplane didn't sell and I'm not really sure what became of the single flying example. Here's a picture of a model....

http://caea.free.fr/imagcoll/maquettes/maqmys30.jpg


and even better, the real thing....

http://www.fotoimages.com/images/aircraft/DA7602.jpg


OK, somebody, somewhere, is this worth any RR points?

Fly Safe!

SLCPilot
(now flying a DA-20)



I don't like to be fueled by anger, I don't like to be fooled by lust...
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1496 times:

SLCPilot, for what it's worth I added you to my RR user list  Wink/being sarcastic Thanks for that history lesson. I'd never knew about the Falcon 30. Does anyone know what happened to that sole example? Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offlineSLCPilot From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 582 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1450 times:

Thanks Flagship....I'll return the respect...

I'll do a little more research, but my money says the airplane was probably chopped up. It seems the Falcon 30 joins the list of "could have's" along with the twin engine DC-10 and other designs that had promise, but whose timing was off....

Fly Safe,

SLCPilot



I don't like to be fueled by anger, I don't like to be fooled by lust...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Didn't Avro/BAerospace Make A Two Engined RJ? posted Wed Apr 28 2004 14:53:33 by Motorhussy
RJ, New Planes And Routes posted Mon Dec 18 2006 11:43:59 by Manni
DL/US Merger Fleet Speculation - Part 2 posted Mon Dec 18 2006 00:29:27 by 1337Delta764
Any Chance Of RJ Flying Amman - Manchester? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 11:31:57 by 8herveg
New Rj Terminal For DEN (con B) Finally! posted Wed Nov 29 2006 23:38:16 by Flyguy595
Two Engined 744 posted Tue Nov 28 2006 09:59:17 by GlobalVillage
Official DL/US Merger Thread: Fleet Speculation posted Mon Nov 20 2006 06:43:28 by Diamond
DL+US = RJ Bloodbath? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 11:05:12 by FCYTravis
November 5th 2008 Here Is The News.--speculation posted Sun Nov 5 2006 11:47:45 by Philb
RJ's First EMB-195 posted Sat Oct 28 2006 20:53:32 by American777