Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rumour: New FA Bases In IND And PDX  
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7386 posts, RR: 51
Posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5580 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Just saw this on the a webpage. New bases opening in IND and PDX.
PDX-AMS is forthcoming for a possible March 1st start.

http://pfaawatch.com/forum/threads.php?id=1018_0_5_0_C



[Edited 2004-11-08 19:48:48]


Made from jets!
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7341 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5502 times:

Why would a new FA base be needed in IND, if a majority of the new flights are currently being flown by Pinnacle?

User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3799 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5503 times:

Interesting... no sign of a MKE base though? That's odd. I'm wondering if an announcement in imminant regarding PDX-AMS? March 1 is not far away and nothing is available for purchase as of yet. Could this be where the extra 330-200 is going?


AZJ


User currently offlineKwbl From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 441 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5499 times:

Jetjack74-

I have seen you post previously about PDX-AMS but I have heard no announcment and nothing in the newspaper indicating this is in the works. It seems that a March 1 start is pretty close for a new route such as this. When do you think NW will make it "official". As much as I would like to see it, I have trouble believing PDX could support 2 daily NS flights to Europe. Have you heard if NW is considering MEM or JFK or BOS or MCO??


User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3799 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5476 times:

Kwbl - MEM, JFK and BOS are all linked to AMS.


AZJ


User currently offlineKwbl From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 441 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5470 times:

Whoops-poorly worded on my part. I meant PDX to MEM, JFK, MCO etc...Sorry about the confusion!

User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7341 posts, RR: 28
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5468 times:

I'm doubtful with either of these bases.

Why would they open a new FA base in PDX, when they can bridge them in from SEA. Similar to how the new A330 pilot base will shortly be opening in SEA.

As for IND, its so easy to bridge in crews from DTW, MSP, and MEM, why would they go to the expense to open such a base for the handful of non-hub NW routes.


User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3799 posts, RR: 28
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5465 times:

Oh - I'm willing to put money on never seeing JFK or MCO. It doesn't fit into their business model. MEM however, is likely since it is a hub. If it happens it would probably be a 319 once a day.


AZJ


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7386 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5414 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As for IND, its so easy to bridge in crews from DTW, MSP, and MEM, why would they go to the expense to open such a base for the handful of non-hub NW routes.

You think so? It's very costly to have to postion crews in and out of station like that. Deadhead-working crews helps to alliviate some of this cost, except when it's a DC9-40 or a 50. Which only can spare one extra jumpseat. And the IND-LAX may not be able to be timed accordingly for legality reasons. It does sound abit far-fetched, but it does hold water. Maybe they're anticipating opening up more routes in another few weeks.

Now the PDX base, I think is very good possiblity. The HNL crews are covering the PDX-NRT, but any additional flying I would suspect would put a strain on the base itself. If you happen to be going to PDX sometime soon, ask some of the staff about the PDX-AMS, see what info you can find. I do a lot of 757 trips and I ask almost all the CSA's about it. The Customer Service Supervisor and the CSAs that I spoke to, they seem to be very sure this going to happen. March 1st is the date that the CSS gave me.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7386 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5393 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have seen you post previously about PDX-AMS but I have heard no announcment and nothing in the newspaper indicating this is in the works
Yeah and it was a shock when NW announced the PDX-NRT and PDX-HNL service additions. NW does this frequently. They rare send send out pre-press releases. When was the last time you saw this headline, "Northwest files application to fly from XXX-XXX"? It was a 4 month window to the start of DTW-CAN from when the announced it. They may divert the use of an aircraft from another route. You never can tell.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3799 posts, RR: 28
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5372 times:

But jack - don't you think they would have announced it already if it were starting March 1? They've got to start marketing it and start selling seats on these flights soon. Although, they announced the IND stuff in July about 3.5 months out so maybe it's possible.


AZJ


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7386 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5309 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ok maybe the March 1st date that they said, may have been confused with an announcement date. I tried to ask the CSS but he had to push a flight and didn't get the clarification before we started to board. I wasn't sure what he mean't by that. So my gaffe. It's anyone's guess. NW operates differently than many of the other carriers. I'm not saying this is factual, but the chatter and the people i've spoken too, leads me to believe that this is going to happen. But NW is a day to day carrier, and things change at the drop of a hat over there in Building A.


Made from jets!
User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3799 posts, RR: 28
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 5284 times:

I don't doubt you jetjack... I just doubt the timing of it all. NWA is a "slide under the radar" airline. While they don't make a big deal about every little thing and issue press releases like there's no tomorrow... they WILL announce any new route with plenty of time to market and seel the seats. If this comes to fruition, it will be just in time for the summer season.


AZJ


User currently offlineLeneld From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 5147 times:

I just love NWA! I'm so happy that they're showing some interest in PDX. I really do hope that the PDX-AMS,PDX-MEM, heck PDX to anywhere comes to fuition. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that NWA will make PDX it's next focus city.....

User currently offlineSTLGph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9233 posts, RR: 26
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 5116 times:

Well, IND makes since to me especially with drastic changes coming for US Airways and ATA, or perhaps possible liquidation of business and assets for both of those carriers. If both carriers cease operations, Northwest would be in a perfect position to sweep in and comfortably using A319's make Orlando, Tampa, Ft. Lauderdale easily 3x a day, Ft. Meyers 1x a day, Sarasota 1x a day, Los Angeles 2x a day, Boston 3x a day, Washington National 4x a day, Las Vegas 3x a day, Phoenix 3x a day, and New York LaGuardia 5x a day.

If they don't liquidate, I look for Northwest to keep Phoenix operating year around rather than just seasonal service. I wouldn't be surprised if their next round of route expansions include once a day nonstops to Seattle or San Francisco.








Eternal darkness we all should dread. It's hard to party when you're dead.
User currently offlineLeneld From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 5093 times:

It would be so cool seeing 2 A330-200 parked next to eachother at the international concourse D at PDX.

User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26196 posts, RR: 76
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 5075 times:

>Why would they open a new FA base in PDX, when they can bridge them in from SEA. Similar to how the new A330 pilot base will shortly be opening in SEA.<

It is harder to bridge larger F/A crews than it is to bridge 2-3 pilots



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineDtwintlflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 301 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 5050 times:

Why would we have new bases anywhere when you have BOS and SEA and LAX and SFO that aren't that big as it is. BOS and LAX have seen their bases slashed dramatically in the past five years. It makes no sense to have a new base in IND when DTW is very close by and you can build those flight patterns out of any other base. I am not saying it couldn't happen, but it doesn't seem to make much sense. With a new FA base, no matter how small, you would have a lot of staffing necessary (base manager, FA manager, Ground OPS manager, etc.....). As for AMS, let me get a raise of hands how many times that rumor was spread. NEVER HAPPEN. NW will definitely be adding flying out of MKE IND and maybe even PDX, but no FA bases.

User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7386 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4976 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

BOS and LAX have seen their bases slashed dramatically in the past five years
Actually, the west coast bases are back to there pre-9/11 levels, and hours available for bid have increased with little transfers. The west coast bases, I believe will be recalling soon after the latest round are settled in.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineLeneld From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4864 times:

What equiptment would they use for the PDX-AMS flights?

User currently offlineAirplaneBoy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 548 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4295 times:

When you have an operation as large as NW's IND operations will be (and PDX's Pacific/Asia routes), having at least a reserve base is almost a necessity for irregular operations (unless flight delays or cancellations are acceptable).

I think this is why the crew base rumors have been circulating. Some NW FA's have thought that if IND and PDX became bases, it would be odd to not have one at MKE as well, since their operation there is also siginificantly large.

In any case, having bases where a large operation is located makes sense in terms of flexible crew scheduling, as well as having reserve crews should any part of the operation be affected by vacation time, crews who call in sick, flying within legal time frames, etc.

We'll see what happens. Anything is possible.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Cheers!


User currently offlineDCAYOW From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 591 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3818 times:


LUFTHANSA has said that PDX-FRA in the winter is difficult, summer is not a problem. If NW is entering PDX-AMS - next winter may result in some "pruning" of routes.

PDX can support one daily service to a European hub, but two will be a bloodbath.



Retorne ao céu...
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7386 posts, RR: 51
Reply 22, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3727 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Why would we have new bases anywhere when you have BOS and SEA and LAX and SFO that aren't that big as it is. BOS and LAX have seen their bases slashed dramatically in the past five years
Dtwintlflyer,
I don't know how long you,ve been with the company, but SFO, HNL were bases that were opened leading right up to the 93/94 bankruptcy period. Although we were in danger of filing for banruptcy, NW still opened the those bases in 91-92 timeframe. And which both still remain today.

With a new FA base, no matter how small, you would have a lot of staffing necessary (base manager, FA manager, Ground OPS manager, etc.....). As for AMS, let me get a raise of hands how many times that rumor was spread. NEVER HAPPEN. NW will definitely be adding flying out of MKE IND and maybe even PDX, but no FA bases.

Well it really depends on how much space was leased from the Port Of Portland. You would be surprised how fast things like a base opening move. SFO and HNL was a surprise to some when they opened, although there were rumors before-hand. Now AMS, I remember those rumors, but I agree that would never happen. NW like to employ local people for overseas jobs, because of the advantage that in some countries, the labor wages can be cheap. Flying will continue to grow out of these focus cities, but sometime, operational needs may drive us to open new workforce opportunities there, but never say never Smile/happy/getting dizzy.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineDtwintlflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 301 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3689 times:

I didn't realize both SFO and HNL came open just before the near bankruptcy. I would say most bases are up to pre 9-11 flying, but I also took in account the flying lost in the year leading up to 9-11. SEA lost KIX etc....LAX had a DC10 going to HNL....
I know it doesn't take long to stand up operations at either IND or PDX. I think that IND remains close enough to DTW to cover irregular ops. Although this too was before my start date, I didn't think MKE ever had an FA base even when there were 60 + departures out of there.

All in all, these last few weeks have shown NW continues to be in a "positive" position among the majors. I think a lot has been done in the past four years to ensure we not only survive but eventually grow again. The pieces are in place, we just need everything to continue to get better (oh and a few of those "spare" 747-400 from UAL would be nice)

Fly Red Tails


User currently offlineNWAFA From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1893 posts, RR: 16
Reply 24, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3668 times:

Jet,

It is JUST RUMOR. Also, personally, I feel it is so wrong for you to post that post since it comes "from that site"..shameful. The people on that site are losers! The people that post on that site are nothing but a bunch of losers, complainers..moaners...and scabs! Hope your not one of them!



THANK YOU FOR FLYING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!
25 NWAFA : Jet, One more thing, just before Richard left, I asked him personally the question about AMS-PDX, and he said NO. That will NOT happen. SEA-AMS is clo
26 Nwafflyer : Hey, let's do FNT/NRT on a A330 -- great flight -- and all of Flint will be on it --
27 Post contains images S12PPL : PDX isn't the dying airport it seemed to have been a few years ago. The idea of building a new terminal is looking like a great possibility soon, alon
28 Jetjack74 : One more thing, just before Richard left, I asked him personally the question about AMS-PDX, and he said NO. That will NOT happen And Hector Adler als
29 Dtwintlflyer : Let's not get into a mudslinging contest about whether you like or don't like the current union. Who cares... Everyone seemed to hate the Teamsters, s
30 Flashmeister : PDX isn't the dying airport it seemed to have been a few years ago. The idea of building a new terminal is looking like a great possibility soon, Foll
31 S12PPL : I don't. E/D concourse is pretty well filled up these days between Delta, American, Hawaiian, Mexicana Continental, United, Skywest, Air Canada Jazz,
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Delta FA Bases In Europe? posted Mon Oct 16 2006 23:00:53 by DALelite
US Airlines With FA Bases In Other Countries posted Mon Jun 20 2005 21:12:51 by BigGSFO
New Lie-Flats In Thai And Malaysia? posted Mon Jun 7 2004 13:22:14 by FLYmarcookie
New TAP Destinations In Brazil And Central Europe posted Sun Feb 8 2004 02:35:53 by DETA737
New Trans Flights From SEA And PDX posted Mon May 27 2002 00:33:24 by Dellatorre
Korean Air New Destinations In South And SE Asia posted Fri Sep 29 2006 21:02:12 by 777way
Madrid, Bremen And Bournemouth New EasyJet Bases posted Wed May 17 2006 16:38:22 by Delta777Jet
Rumor - UA FA Bases Closures And Combo's posted Fri Nov 18 2005 00:07:51 by FA4UA
Chaos In MX And AM: New CEO For Am And More... posted Thu Dec 16 2004 22:38:49 by Rojo
Hows Indy Air Doing In CRW? And All New Cities. posted Sat Jul 24 2004 05:39:11 by Kcrwflyer