It says the Spaceship One carrier uses J85s to climb to 53,000 ft. Did they choose turbojets (instead of fans) because of better high-altitude performance? If so, is it just the afterburner that makes it perform better, or does the J85 itself outperform a comparable fan?
Widebodyphotog From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 917 posts, RR: 68 Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1002 times:
I believe the J85-GE-5's were chosen because they were available and they could get them at a very low price. A comparable turbofan would be something like A TF-731 or a PWC PW-300, both vastly more expensive engines even on the used market, and much heavier as well. I do remember watching the documentary and seeing an F-5 or T-38 trainer in the background sans engines, so I it's possible they were removed to that aircraft and transplanted to White Knight. The all up weight for White Knight and Spaceship One was about 17,000lbs giving a thrust to weight ratio of 2.2:1, and without Spaceship One close to unity. The J85's thrust would be behind those turbofans I mentioned at altitudes below 10,000 feet or so but after that the J85 would leave them far behind as far as thrust is concerned.
-widebodyphotog
If you know what's really going on then you'll know what to do
Gigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16215 posts, RR: 89 Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 967 times:
Turbojets do performa a lot better at altitude, yes.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6465 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
