DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2302 times:
I want to hear your thoughts on the chances of Embraer producing a widebody aircraft. As it stands, they are beginning to chip away at the heels of Airbus's A318 and Boeings 736 with their EMB-190.
EMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9286 posts, RR: 13 Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2275 times:
ZERO...... they are very happy with the market they have and see no need to go any bigger. Let alone the cost to build new hangars would be HUGE
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2264 times:
ZERO...... they are very happy with the market they have and see no need to go any bigger. Let alone the cost to build new hangars would be HUGE
Boeing and Airbus ponied up. Plus Embraer have very economical aircraft, I think their economics could really scare the Sh8t out of the big 2 if they ever moved into the market.
ERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6626 posts, RR: 19 Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2259 times:
Doubtful, but it would be nice to see the EMB-235 (115 passengers) and EMB-240 (125 passengers), all 2x2!! Couldn't you just imagine!
DfwRevolution From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2251 times:
Probability of a larger Embraer?
About the same probability of you using the search feature or doing a bit of research on your own-- ZEROOO
Embraer is partially owned by EADS, owner of Airbus, so why in god's name would EADS authorize Embraer to build a competing product to the much more profitable Airbus venture?
Second, a modern widebody cost huge amounts of money. The 777 was estimated at 12+ billion, add in another 1 billion for 773ER/772LR. And the 7E7 will tip the scales at 8+ billion. The E170/E190 was spare change compared to these developments. The complexity and cost of aircraft its practically exponential, there is quite a difference between RJ and ULH C-market widebody.
And also, why would Boeing/Airbus *ever* allow another entrant to the 200+ seat market? Every order is a massive brawl as it is... besides, what needs are not being met that Embraer could exploit? None.... no niche for them to soley occupy. They have the RJ market down... just stay there and be comfortable.
EMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9286 posts, RR: 13 Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2238 times:
but it would be nice to see the EMB-235 (115 passengers) and EMB-240 (125 passengers), all 2x2!!
Ah, the Embraer 190.....!!!!
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
Jetjeanes From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1415 posts, RR: 1 Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1973 times:
about as much as g w bush winning another election
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
