Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA LCC?  
User currently offlineUA772IAD From Australia, joined Jul 2004, 1730 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1887 times:

Before I begin here's the disclaimer:
YES I did do a thorough search for this topic, and NO I didn't find anything. Okay- that's done.

I was wondering why AA doesn't have a LCC like the other two big legacy carriers? (UA=Ted, DL=Song-do they have abbreviations?). I know that AA did purchase Reno Air in the mid 90s, but they only have their mainline and regional/commuter service. Why haven't they followed the trend?

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUA772IAD From Australia, joined Jul 2004, 1730 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1878 times:

PART II:
If AA DID have a LCC, would it prosper? And in terms of design, what would they call it and what would their planes look like? (just for fun)


User currently offlineThrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2688 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1867 times:

Starting LCCs have done nothing so far for the big U.S. carriers. DL and UA have paid dearly for starting Song and Ted...they are draining their finances down the toilet. DL and UA have already proven that starting an LCC is not the way to generate revenue. AA is wise to spend their money on other things such as new international service, where WN isn't there to threaten them. AA is losing enough passengers to WN as it is....if they started an LCC they would likely suffer the same fate as UA and DL. Starting an airline in these troubled times is not a wise move, especially for a big U.S. carrier like AA, which has a hard enough time against WN.


Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineMoman From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1054 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1861 times:

I always thought they should have overhauled TWA and made it their LCC.

Reasons for TWA being LCC:
-Mainly MD-80 based & 757 (smaller jets) (DUMP 767s on AA)
-Flights to a lot of leisure destinations
-Motivated workforce that wasn't really interested in being integrated into AA the way AA wanted them to be
-Single major hub @ STL
-The big plus is that TWA would still be alive and we would see the transition livery still!!!!

I think it could have been possible had AA renegotiated all the leases and such. The AA workforce was paid less than AA so they could have kept it that way, and integrated the two where it made most sense.

Of course that was my dream, but not to be (for now).

Anyways, Gerald Arpey is on the record for saying he doesn't see any use for an AA LCC, so I wouldn't count on them doing it anytime soon.

Moman



AA Platinum Member - American Airlines Forever
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1830 times:

At this point AA is struggling. They really should find some ways to stabilize their own situation before embarking on a LCC venture and going up against B6 and WN who happen to be probably the only carriers making money!

User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6696 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1807 times:

The AA LCC would be called "Rican" with a hub at SJU...

User currently offlineJetBlue From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 393 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1739 times:

Maybe they could call it "ERIC".....it could be Ted's big bulley!  Smile Or if we need a female name, "Erica" could work....hehe...

jetBlue



We know for you it's not just a seat on a flight to a place. It's a seat on a flight to your life.
User currently offlineCactus739 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2439 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1717 times:

Why hasn't AA followed the trend? Simple. It doesn't make sense and hasn't worked for anyone yet.

You come up with a cutesy lil name. For AA i'm thinking "Can". You take some of your planes and repaint them in cutesy colors. Then you take some of your regular passengers, put them on "Can" and charge them less. You still don't make money. Ask MetroJet, Shuttle by United and Continental Lite. You can find them at Mojave or Victorville.

US Airways could be "US". Then it would be an "US" versus everyone else battle.




You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
User currently offlineJetBlue From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 393 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1682 times:

"US Airways could be "US". Then it would be an "US" versus everyone else battle."

That's great Cactus739!  Smile



We know for you it's not just a seat on a flight to a place. It's a seat on a flight to your life.
User currently offlineAa777flyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

AA has LONG believed an airline within an airline would not work. UA proved this with Shuttle By United. They are proving it again with TED. Additionally the ALPA would NEVER go for it. They have enough of a S*%# fit over Eagle.
Never say never, but with AA's current costs among the LOWEST of the legacy carriers, I doubt AA will start a LCC.


User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1589 times:

Thrust: Well Said.

NW, CO, and AA do not have any LCCs and they are doing the best right now out of all of the legacy carriers.

UA, DL, and US have LCCs or formerly had LCCs to the point where they took up so much money and resources, the airline went bankrupt, or they had to shut down the LCC and never fully recovered.


User currently offlineAeronuts From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 8 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1571 times:

Flying on some AA routes feels like it's a LCC.

User currently offlineSPREE34 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2233 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (9 years 8 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Aa777flyer....." Additionally the ALPA would NEVER go for it. They have enough of a S*%# fit over Eagle."

ALPA has no dog in that fight. American Pilots are represented by Allied Pilots Association. APA. But they wouldn't go for it either.

AA is doing it right by fixing their mainline issues. They can still compete domestically with the LCCs through their present cost reduction moves.



I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
User currently offlineJafa From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 782 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (9 years 8 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1459 times:

All the majors have a LCC, its called the coach cabin. At least its not like some european LCC where you have to pay for soda, tea, and coffee. Its dumb to have a seperate LCC division, it just drives up costs of the parent company.

User currently offlineACAfan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 710 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (9 years 8 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

AA does have low costs, when compared to the other majors. Especially since their Stupid-80 fleet is paid for.

When the costs are lower than the others, and the fares are the same as the others, AA does pretty well as it is.

There is no need for an internal LCC.



Freddie Laker ... May be at peace with his maker ... But he is a persona non grata ... with IATA
User currently offlineSeptember11 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3623 posts, RR: 21
Reply 15, posted (9 years 8 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1384 times:

I suppose if TWA exists today, they would be #1 LCC airline under AA.


Airliners.net of the Future
User currently offlineSkyTeam7488 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 93 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (9 years 8 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

IIRC, didn't AA already have an LCC way back when called AAway, I think I remember something on here about it, was it a reality, where and what did they fly??

TonyO



You only live once... So live the high life.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA LCC? posted Thu Nov 11 2004 01:35:58 by UA772IAD
AA LCC posted Mon Dec 29 2003 07:00:23 by Copaair737
AA LCC posted Fri Nov 14 2003 23:13:01 by SprxflySWA
Is AA's S80 Operations A "pseudo-LCC" Like WN? posted Sat Oct 15 2005 12:50:02 by KensukeAida
AA To Test LCC Operating Strategy posted Fri Jun 11 2004 20:27:26 by LY4XELD
AA Not Ruling Out Forming LCC Division posted Sat Nov 8 2003 05:24:24 by TWFirst
AA To Launch Their Own LCC? posted Wed Feb 12 2003 19:04:50 by EA CO AS
AA DFW - LHR? posted Fri Mar 23 2007 18:11:39 by Ghillier
AA 156 BOS-LHR 3/22 posted Thu Mar 22 2007 18:51:13 by AEflyguy
The Last AA 727 Flights posted Thu Mar 22 2007 05:04:17 by Tommy767