Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Difference Between 738 And 739  
User currently offlineTriJetFan1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1128 posts, RR: 7
Posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4341 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all, I noticed that the -900 series ir only a couple feet larger than the -800. I was wondering whats the difference between the two.


Earned PPL June 26, 2007
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 979 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4327 times:

Well.. the 737-900 is a couple of feet longer than the -800  Big grin

The 739 seats 177 in 2-class configuration compared to 162 for a 738. However, the 739 has the same emergency exits as the 738 so they both seat 189 in single-class configuration. Boeing has a possible 737-900X in the future that adds an emergency exit door and additional fuel tanks that would allow it to roughly match the A321.


User currently offlineTriJetFan1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1128 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4321 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well.. the 737-900 is a couple of feet longer than the -800

I knew this, I said this because I was wondering what was the other differences between the two, I made the obvious connection that a manufactor wouldnt make two planes with the only difference being a couple feet.



Earned PPL June 26, 2007
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 979 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4292 times:

I made the obvious connection that a manufactor wouldnt make two planes with the only difference being a couple feet

Well they do. The only physical difference between the 738 and 739 is a few seat rows. And the fact that the 739 can't have winglets for some reason...

The 739 is flown by AS, KL, CO, and others along side the 738 in some cases. The 739 allows a few extra seat rows, which means more revenue as its opperating cost are somewhat close to the 738. Just think of the 739 as the A321 missing an emergency exit row.


User currently offlineGaruda From Indonesia, joined Nov 2000, 584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4279 times:

Anybody can explain why B739 can't have winglets? is it because of weight issues?

User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4243 times:

As someone else mentioned, there's no increase in pax capacity between a -800 and a -900 (and it's something like 12 feet longer, I think). However, in a two class configuration, there's a seating difference (CO, for example, seats 155 in a -800 and 167 in a -900).

Steve


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4211 times:

The wings are already near enough to their structural load with the extra weight of the fuselage that winglets are an iffy subject for certification.

The -900X, if it flies, will have fortified wings for the winglets.

N


User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26538 posts, RR: 75
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4198 times:

According to Boeing, the 739 can take winglets, just no one has ordered them yet, and given that they would probably have to share in the development cost, they probably wont.
The only reason the 739 does not hold more PAX at max capacity is because Boeing did not see the market being there to design another full door (which is what would probably be needed) into the plane. All the potential customers for the specific model were going to have an F cabin anyway, or would fly with no more than 189 pax. The 739X would have the door added. Remember, the 757 has 3 full doors plus overwing exits.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineFlyabunch From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4200 times:

At least on the Continental 739's they all have a mid-cabin lavatory while in the 738's some have it and some don't. It may be helpful to the flight attendants to have these lavs (improves service by keeping people in the front of coach from having to go all the way to the back for a lav while the FA's are in the aisle with carts), but they are not fun to sit near.

Mike


User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4196 times:

Could a B739 have a tailcone exit?

AAndrew


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 979 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4169 times:

Could a B739 have a tailcone exit?

No the APU is in the way. However, the rumored 737-900X would have a composite-built pressure bulkhead that would be flat rather than domed as is convention. This would allow 2 more seat-rows (one being an exit row as well) without physically stretching the aircraft further. The new exit door would be located halfway between the overwing exits and the rear service doors.


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7587 posts, RR: 43
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4006 times:

Does anybody know if there is any timeframe for Boeing's official announcement of the 739X?


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineWhitehatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3982 times:

However, the rumored 737-900X would have a composite-built pressure bulkhead that would be flat rather than domed as is convention.

That's interesting.

The benefits would be obvious in that there would be a gain of some wasted space, and cabin furnishings could be relocated right up to the bulkhead. I would think that it would also take some heavy testing to ensure the FAA were happy with it. Rear bulkheads are a bit of a sensitive area after the related accidents, and a flat one would need to be able to withstand tailstrikes every bit as much as a dome or even more so.


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 979 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3936 times:

Does anybody know if there is any timeframe for Boeing's official announcement of the 739X?

The total program would take close to a year, but Boeing needs 35-40 firm orders before starting. VirginBlue was interested (might still be) but they did not place enough frames to launch the program and no other airlines would fill the other slots.

When the U.S. domestic market rebounds (if ever) we could the carreirs with 738 adding some 739X.

The benefits would be obvious in that there would be a gain of some wasted space, and cabin furnishings could be relocated right up to the bulkhead. I would think that it would also take some heavy testing to ensure the FAA were happy with it.

The flat bulkhead will also be used in the 7E7 from what I take...


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7587 posts, RR: 43
Reply 14, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3916 times:

Thanks for the info DfwRevolution. I did not know about Virgin Blue, but I had read here several times that AM was interested in being the launch customer. I just don't know if AM and Virgin Blue need, in the aggregate, 40 planes (I am sure AM does not need more than 10).


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Differnce Between 738 And 739? Why Not The 757-100 posted Mon Aug 19 2002 18:33:53 by Airmale
Difference Between 737 And 738 On Delta.com? posted Thu Aug 21 2008 06:35:14 by Atlanta
Weight Difference Between Early And Late Frames posted Tue Sep 27 2011 05:35:14 by embrider
Seats On CO 738 And 739 posted Sun Sep 26 2010 17:18:45 by BACCALA
Difference Between ATL And CVG For DL posted Tue Jul 17 2007 04:37:04 by Boeing743
What's The Difference Between Airways And Airlines posted Sat Jun 16 2007 20:17:48 by Mijoatlanta
Difference Between RG And Vasp & TransB posted Tue Aug 15 2006 15:42:21 by Sampa737
What Is The Difference Between A342 And 343/346 posted Wed Jul 5 2006 18:48:39 by Myk
Difference Between CX333 And CX333X! posted Thu Apr 20 2006 13:25:20 by Timetable
Difference Between 741 And 742 posted Sun Feb 5 2006 15:00:04 by B52murph