Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Update On The MK Cargo Crash In Halifax Last Month  
User currently offlineYukimizake From Japan, joined Mar 2004, 529 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3788 times:

TSB rules out overloading as the cause.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2004/11/15/cargo_plane041115.html




'Opfer müssen gebracht werden (Sacrifices must be made)' - Otto Lilienthal
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBENNETT123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7817 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3629 times:


I know that there were suggestions on this forum that the aircraft did not use the full runway length. Was this possibility confirmed or refuted, or is it still open. The possibility of the load shifting was also suggested.


User currently offlineOkie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3198 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3539 times:

Thanks for the heads up Yukimizake.

The TSB of Canada is very meticulate the best I can tell. Even if the "holy grail" of the cause of the accident is immediately evident on the FDR the TSB is not going to announce the cause until all facts are in and examined related or not to the accident.
As in the case of the weight of the cargo, the load sheet would be immediately available and I am sure that the TSB went to great lengths to be sure the actual weight matched that of the reported on the load sheet therefore the delay in announcing the results. Sort of surprised me that they announced that as soon as they did.
The possibility of the of the load shift or cargo being loaded incorrectly in relation to CoG can be determined from the FDR (as in 3 degree input to the elevator and the plane pivots 10 degrees as an example) The full runway length can be extrapolated as well. Since we do not have the information available we will just have to go with arm chair speculation. Maybe they can get some information off the CVR that was damaged, it is always interesting to see what flight deck dynamics, for lack of a better phrase, are taking place in the cockpit before an accident.

Okie


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Info On The Venezuela MD82 Crash In August posted Mon Jan 23 2006 12:52:37 by DeC
1992 El Al Cargo Crash In AMS On Nat'l Geo Channel posted Tue Mar 28 2006 04:47:50 by 777DadandJr
Any Further Info On The DL Shtl Smoke In Cabin? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 18:23:41 by Cpos
Any Update On The AN148 Project? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 20:45:52 by Csturdiv
Update On The Pro Air MD-90 Scrappings posted Sat Jul 15 2006 08:29:11 by A340Spotter
Any News Or Update On The SQ Order? posted Tue Jan 31 2006 15:02:40 by UALMMFlyer
SIA Update On The A380 + Photo Of New Aerobridge posted Sat Aug 20 2005 04:39:37 by Vivek0072
Update On The Ex AC 744s? posted Thu Aug 4 2005 02:09:15 by Cgagn
Update On Fenix... First Ever LCC In Colombia? posted Tue Apr 27 2004 20:32:59 by Wimpycol
Any Info On The Former CO 733 In ANC? posted Thu Mar 4 2004 04:16:34 by Rydawg82