Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Specific And Unique SkyTeam/Thalys Threat For BRU  
User currently offlineBrightCedars From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 1286 posts, RR: 2
Posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2065 times:

A few years ago AF decided to go hand in hand with 2H and drop its CDG-BRU flights in favor of ZYR-CDG high-speed trains. Check-in (or so) is offered at ZYR but you still have to transfer your luggage yourself at CDG and hence line up in the queues there.

Now AF has acquired KL and a similar option could be envisaged to replace KL's AMS-BRU flights with a ZYR-AMS (maybe pending the inauguration of a shorter travel time between the two stations which currently stands at 2h40 compared to 1h15 on ZYR-CDG). AF's existing agreement with 2H may make the thing easier for a deal with its KL part.

Imagine AF and KL both having a high-speed train link between ZYR and their respective home airports, providing countless connections to their network and eventually sharing that advantage with their SkyTeam partners. You could see a CO, DL, KE, MEA, NW tag on any of these train services (alongside AF & KL) that would boost those airlines' offer and visibility on the market but could be a serious blow to the airport's ambitions, whichever they may be.

SN has recently inaugurated its high-speed train service between BRU and XPG to cater for Africans in the Paris area but this offer is in no way a threat to CDG compared to what the above fiction would mean for BRU.

I believe that this is a unique situation in the world today. Do you think it is normal that a specific carrier/alliance be given such a competitive edge over the local airport and its operators?


I want the European Union flag on airliners.net!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSNBA319 From Netherlands, joined Oct 2003, 298 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1987 times:

last thing i heard was that AF were not happy with their CDG-ZYR connection and were quitting it.

Besides the accesibility of BRU is much better than CDG is for Paris. So the need to skip BRU because it is so far away and so congested is less likely to be around.


User currently offlineKEno From Malaysia, joined Feb 2004, 1842 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

I hope this doesn't sound too harsh but you have just summed up nicely as to why Belgium would eventually no longer need their own carrier to serve longhaul sectors.

[Edited 2004-11-17 12:24:22]

User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1913 times:

I makes me wonder that AF did this between Brussel and Paris and is considering it now also for the Amsterdam route. It sounds not very comfortable if I have to recheck my luggage at Cologne.
In contrast LH also has its code on the train to Cologne and Stuttgart from FRA, but get your boarding card and have custums at the station, so that it is really flying on altitude 0. And also LH has 16 train-flights to CGN while AF only has 5 to Brussel. But even under that more comfortabe conditions LH didn't give up it's flights completely.
So I wonder that it seems to be working for AF to abandon all flights, while is more comfortable with offering both options.

Are there serious plans for AF to make it's trains real flight-like?


User currently offlineBrightCedars From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 1286 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1879 times:

Hey KEno!

There are weapons in business and these are the main disadvantages of inter-modality for BRU in this case. We didn't list the advantages and the possibilities the other way round if a comparable offer was available.

On a side note I can just imagine a whole new different product based at BRU like an intercontinental hub of long-haul premium only flights. BRU certainly has room to offer such a thing while those around wouldn't have the capacity to support both current and such operations and making it comfortable for the targeted highly attractive and sensitive executive customers.



I want the European Union flag on airliners.net!
User currently offlineBENNETT123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7209 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1788 times:


My understanding was that the whole point of the exersize was that there was a shortage of slots.

Is this correct?.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would There Be Demand For BRU-South America Route? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 20:31:38 by Krist0f
Cathay To Leave Oneworld And Join Skyteam? posted Wed Nov 16 2005 21:39:14 by Wingedarrow
FL And Wendys Create A Drive-thru For The 737 posted Tue Nov 15 2005 03:54:50 by Nosedive
More A380's And Possible 787's In Future For LH... posted Thu Feb 17 2005 20:00:44 by MIASkies
UPS And Air France Launch Customers For 777-200LRF posted Fri Jan 14 2005 19:06:38 by FCKC
And Now, Some -good- News For USAirways... posted Mon Jan 3 2005 02:34:24 by OPNLguy
Boeing And Etihad Airways Close Deal For Five 777- posted Fri Dec 17 2004 20:39:26 by Nyc777
Fraport Drops Bid For BRU posted Tue Jul 13 2004 13:46:02 by BuyantUkhaa
Hijack Threat For Air India Flights To Dubai posted Wed Jun 30 2004 17:34:22 by Mrniji
5x 744s And 4x 777s Put Up For Sale By UA posted Fri May 7 2004 14:40:42 by Na