Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Aleways At It Again  
User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12242 posts, RR: 35
Posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3203 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Reported in the Norwegian newspaper VG today, two BA F/As won't be charged with being drunk on duty because of a Finnish mistake. They blew a 0.056 and 0.051 on the breathalyzer, but when a blood sample was taken several hours later, there was no trace of alcohol. As Finnish law don't allow for a breathalyzer test only, they will not be charged. The plane in question left HEL for LHR six hours delayed as a new crew was flown in from London.

Here is a link to the article, but it's Norwegian only:
http://www.vg.no/pub/vgart.hbs?artid=255106



911, where is your emergency?
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGeoffm From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2111 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3106 times:

I assume the 0.056 is Blood Alcohol Content, which equates to 56mg per 100ml? That's slightly above the average continental drink-drive limit at 50mg (ie illegal to drive), below the UK at 80mg (ie legal to drive), and well below the American at 100mg... assuming I've got my maths right.

What's the drink-fly limit?

(source http://www.britainusa.com/faq/showfaq.asp?SID=470)

Geoff M.


User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 62
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3084 times:

...and if there was no trace after "several" (not more than a couple ill bet - the Finns are VERY hot on these things) hours - then what do you suppose that means? It means that there was no trace in the bloodstream - ie: they were safe to fly. The breathalyser must have been innaccurate - or found a trace, which was measured inncorrectly.

Either way - they were safe.

So where does "British Aleways at it again" come into it? Sensationalist BA -bashing perhaps?

Is it constructive? No.

Is it helpful? No.

Is it doing anyone concerned justice by commenting on hearsay and press reports as fact? No.

So why do it?

You think you are the first to break this massive, earthshattering news that BA are somehow an unsafe airline because a blood test showed up negative?

Grow up pondlife.




What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
User currently offlineSchooner From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2884 times:

UK limit is 20mg, apparently its the lowest measurable amount. If the limit was any lower they would be picking up naturally generated levels of blood alcohol or words to that effect.

Cheers.



Untouched and Alive
User currently offlineHz747300 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 1665 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2828 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's only Ryanair for me after reading that story. This is scary stuff. I know the amount was trace enough where it could have been from there aftershave lotion, but still, if alcohol was in any part of their system, it's a no-go for me.

Reminds me of that pilot for Serb Air, I saw on the documentary called LAX.




Keep on truckin'...
User currently offlineJeffDCA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2804 times:

It's only Ryanair for me after reading that story.

Don't be so rediculous, it happens just as much with every airline as it does with BA. Yes, that does include US airlines as well, believe it or not!

Cheers,

Jeff


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AKL At It Again With Landing Fees posted Sun Jul 30 2006 23:50:07 by NZ560
Air Madrid At It Again, Passengers Stranded In PTY posted Wed Nov 30 2005 19:20:30 by Luisca
BMI At It Again. No Permission - EDI To MUC posted Tue Sep 20 2005 10:15:28 by N
Air Atlanta Europe At It Again posted Fri Aug 19 2005 13:04:29 by Candid76
O'Leary At It Again, "LH Worst Managed Airline" posted Sat Aug 6 2005 21:04:40 by Sabena332
At It Again, UA Playing 'bumper Cars' W Aircraft posted Thu Aug 12 2004 10:26:54 by Nwfltattendant
Ryanair At It Again! posted Thu Jul 29 2004 05:34:19 by UA777222
Branson's At It Again posted Thu Oct 23 2003 04:00:02 by AA7771stClass
Branson At It Again With Concorde posted Thu May 22 2003 12:05:23 by Srilankan_340
Liz Hurley At It Again? posted Wed May 14 2003 12:53:51 by CPH-R