Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ansett Australia  
User currently offlineWdleiser From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 961 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3326 times:

Why and how did Ansett manage to go bankrupt after the Olympic games in Sydney? I was looking at some of the cabin photos of them tonight and I began to wonder how exactly they went under. Did they have a bad business plan? Was there only ment to be 1 Major INTL carrier of Australia? I think they are one of the airlines that really have never been mentioned since going under. How long were they around too?

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 11845 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3292 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Wdleiser

Word of Warning.....your opening up a BIG can of worms with this topic. This topic has been discussed to many times to remember.


User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7073 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3281 times:

NZers get ready, we're just about not long from getting verbally smashed.
Wdleiser-Ansett went under for many reasons and I am sure that the people replying after me will be more than happy to fill you in. (I am not too sure of the exact cause but I have an idea after reading the threads on here)


User currently offlineMinmiester From Australia, joined May 2001, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3243 times:

AN was founded in 1935 with first flight from Hamilton (in western Victoria) to Melbourne in 1936, so a very old airline indeed. As stated, they went under for a number of reasons, including:

- Inept management
- Inability to capitalise on the Sydney 2000 games (the majority of Australians and visitors at the time thought that Qantas was the official carrier as QF had very successfully gotten many Olympic stars on board for advertising and promotion)
- Debatable Australian government favouritism towards QF with regards to route authorisation etc.
- This will surely illicit debate: NZ take-over blocking SQ money, something AN desperately needed for fleet expansion. One only has to look at the financial state NZ was in at the time, and almost immediately after, to see that although this may have looked good from an NZ perspective, it was one of the worst case scenarios from an AN perspective.
- The arrival of DJ and Impulse on the scene, and the ensueing price war. AN wasn't able to sustain discounting like QF was, as AN could not rely on raking in profits earnt in US dollars.

Cheers

MinMiester

[Edited 2004-11-19 08:42:16]

User currently offlineAirbear From Australia, joined May 2001, 643 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3141 times:

Wdleiser ... like our friends from NZ said above, this is a can of worms best left WELL ALONE, which flares up on A.net from time to time. We all agree to disagree, and I think we're all sick to death of it.

Take it from one who lost 275,000-odd FFP's and about as much again in reward flights booked but lost, including what would have been our family holiday at end-2001...there's such a large cast of players in the killing of Ansett, it is amazing to think that there were just 3 relativley small countries (population-wise) involved, i.e. Aust., NZ & S'pore, with more than enough blame to go around. This wasn't so much a whodunnit story, as a whodidn'tdoit!  Smile

Despite this, we still chose to go on holiday to NZ last year! Forgive & forget, I suppose.

Anyway, this is such a hot topic, there are at least 2 quite hefty books on the subject. 1) Ansett: The Murder of an Airline and 2) Ansett, The Collapse. You can find both listed in the mailorder sections of Airways and/or Airliners magazines in the US as well as Airliner World, UK. There may also be a 3rd book around I think.


User currently offlineWdleiser From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 961 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3059 times:

I have always looked at the forum pretty much everday or so since 2003 and haven't seen anything about Ansett so sorry if I touch some hard notes for some.



Airbear, I am really surprised that your miles weren't transferred over to another Star Carrier, I would think that could be the least they could do.


User currently offlineEta unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2051 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2999 times:

No other star carrier would go near the miles- same situation would happen if UA went under- probably a reason why the miles aren't transferable from airline to airline.

User currently offlineRyanair From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2921 times:

If you click on my name above and look through my recent posts in this forum, I answered that very briefly about a month back.

Hope that helps answer your question.


User currently offlineTonyBurr From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1012 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2913 times:

I always enjoyed flying them! They were the only Star Alliance that flew between Japan and Australia ( ANA still does not??)

User currently offlineAntares From Australia, joined Jun 2004, 1402 posts, RR: 39
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2868 times:

Here are a few figures to think about.

At T2 the former Ansett terminal at Sydney there are now 1.25 times the number of Ansett passengers using half the available gates (or thereabouts depends how you deal with the hard stands) through Virgin Blue, which has half the turnaround time and makes almost an infinitely greater amount of money than AN since AN actually didn't make any money at all during most of its dying decade. (The books were cooked, as revealed in discoveries Qantas and SQ made when they examined the books in the final week before both refused to buy it for one dollar.)

The people flying on Virgin Blue are paying about one fifth the average fares they paid before Ansett was cut adrift by the absolutely brilliant owners at Air New Zealand who left it without a CEO for almost a year after Rod Eddington shot through to BA.

In the other wing of T2 you will find Jetstar, not actually making much money at the moment and costing Qantas a lot, but time will tell, and some Qantaslink flights plus REX, the small turboprop operator.

The situation fills me with mixed emotions. Immense sadness at the misery caused to people I knew well at Ansett, serious anger at the failings of their management (when they had one) both pre and post NZ ownership, but admiration for the new situation, where fares are low and seriously good money is being made by almost all.


User currently offlineAirbear From Australia, joined May 2001, 643 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2825 times:

Hi Wdleiser ... the FFP's were useless - pointless ??? - from the moment AN went down. As said above, no other Star carrier wanted to touch them. Have a look at the thread dealing with this about 10-14 days ago. You will most likely find the same thing happening if UA, US or any other "major" goes belly-up.

All that happened was that a) any trips booked using points on other Star a/l's were to be honoured till dec. 31st that year (2001) , remembering that AN went bust officially on 12 Sept., so big deal really - and b) UA came along and offered to enroll former AN FF's into MilagePlus at the status level they had had w. AN.


User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8434 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 4 weeks ago) and read 2766 times:

To put it simply AN was dying for along time before. Then NZ got greedy and decided to block SQ from buying News Limiteds share. By doing this NZ practically ensured that their fate was going to be the same as AN's but NZ got lucky where AN didn't and got bailed out by the new zealand government while AN got left to sink. by this point SQ was no longer intersted in buying AN. All over red rover.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ansett Australia Brand Re-born? posted Tue Oct 25 2005 10:27:46 by RootsAir
Any Ansett Australia A/c Still In Oz posted Sat Jul 23 2005 10:34:10 by NZ1
Ansett Australia posted Fri Jul 22 2005 19:51:56 by Pilotdude09
Ansett Australia posted Fri Nov 19 2004 07:46:17 by Wdleiser
Ansett Australia In 2002 posted Sun Jul 11 2004 10:11:28 by Terminal688
Ansett Australia.. * Yay* posted Wed Sep 10 2003 14:54:14 by Mx5_boy
Ansett Australia Memory - Their Website Is Back Up posted Sat Feb 15 2003 10:51:47 by QantasAirways
Ansett Australia 12 Months Today posted Fri Sep 13 2002 05:32:38 by F27
How Big Was Air NZ-Ansett Australia Airline Group? posted Wed Sep 4 2002 13:12:00 by United Airline
Ansett Australia To Be Reborn posted Tue Sep 3 2002 10:11:36 by F27