Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Canada Back To Geneva?  
User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6073 times:

I've read on the very Geneva spotters website www.dpts.org that Air Canada will be opening sometime in 2005 a Montreal-Geneva route with A333. Can anyone confirm that and add up some content to that very short release please ?

Cheers,

Beijing21

31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5951 times:

I have no idea but im praying that they will!

User currently offlineScf158 From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5927 times:

I also read the same thing....

"According to various sources in Switzerland and in Quebec, Air Canada is planning to launch a new flight between Montreal Trudeau and Geneva sometime during 2005. Initially Air Canada would operate Airbus A330-300 equipment on this new route, possibly switching by 2006 to Airbus A319LR converted from the current fleet."


User currently offlineDens From Switzerland, joined Sep 2001, 310 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5904 times:

I read the same. it would be great!

User currently offlineFLYACYYZ From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 1914 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5869 times:

GVA is on the list as post-CCAA new routes. I would be amazed if an A333 was deployed, can see them barely filling up a 763. From A333 to eventual A319 in 2006..sounds strange.

The IATA/ICAO staff should be happy about this one !!



Above and Beyond
User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 5721 times:

A possible YUL-GVA has been mentionned several times in the last two months.

However, a 333 on this route doesn't make sense. Better go with the 763...



E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5602 times:

So on both sides of the Atlantic the route has its sources. It means we will certainly here from AC soon...I guess the new summer timetable could be the most suitable time to open up the leg.
But according to a GVA airport recent survey, YUL is one of the most demanded destinations among JFK, Tokyo and London. So why a A333 would not be the appropriate equipement ? I guess connections from Montreal are comparable to Boston.

By the way, Boston and Washington were proposed by former CEO André Dosé and recently the new head of marketing and sales in Geneva as very profitable routes if the equipment, a BBJ or ACJ is available at some extent. Any news on that ?




User currently offlineYUL332LX From Canada, joined Feb 2004, 820 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5572 times:

Of course YUL is one of the most demanded destinations out of GVA but AC has only 8 333s and this aircraft is better suited for routes like YUL-CDG/FRA or YYZ-LHR/FRA.

A 763 would be a perfect fit for this route.




E volavo, volavo felice più in alto del sole, e ancora più su mentre il mondo pian piano spariva lontano laggiù ...
User currently offlineEzycrew From Spain, joined Oct 2001, 460 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5549 times:

I read not long ago on the GVA airport website, that the 1st offline destination from GVA was YUL, so I'm quite sure it can be a great success! Our ZRH-YUL flight always has an average 40-60 pax ex-GVA.
AF, KL and BA also get quite a nice YUL traffic ex GVA via their respective hubs.


User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5533 times:

Does anybody know if other Companies are actively considering GVA for 2005. I know QR is rumoured and will ETIHAD be able to cope with EMIRATES with only 3 weekly connections via MUC. GVA is beginning to deploy efforts to establish itself as a stopover from North America to Asia KU is an example. Sad that thhey only have 2 weekly service and so attract only low yield passengers and even in small numbers.

My assumption is that AC is trying to get GVA with A333 because they eye a destination beyond GVA. Why not India, Lebanon ( it has been already discussed in this forum ) and IRAN!!!


User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 5010 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5486 times:

Given that AC has 8 A333's...

Dont you think that any other additional additions to the fleet would better serve more important destinations?

When was the last time any of us saw an Air Canada 330 not fly to LHR/FRA or CDG? We saw YYZ-FCO in summer 2003, due to the fact that YULFCO was cancelled and pax accomodated on the upgraded capacity.

It sure would be a nice route, all things considered!  Smile



User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5475 times:

FLYYUL, I fully agree with you on the fact that AC like CO wants now to develop "niche" markets. So the smallest aircraft the fleet records will be the basis for new network expansion. I just found interesting that without promoting with extensive intensity Canada, a natural market provides at least 120-150 passengers a day. So potentially, yes 762-3 ER will be the suitable equipment. But the cabin amenities are certainly better featured on A333 and to that point high yield passenger (Geneva's justification for many routes that would otherwise look odd) are sensitive to that.

Well again, does anybody see further developement on the long-haul segment in GVA for 2005 despite the additions made above ?


User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 5010 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5467 times:

I enjoy your optimism Beijing, but in my opinion, it is most unlikely that a plane this big could work in that market.

Feel free to disagree, it would damn nice to see some 757's on that route/



User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5440 times:

You're right, A333 is unlikely to be profitable all year round. I look forward to seeing the product AC will be offering on YUL-GVA-YUL and especially how they will be marketing. I hope though the cabin on 762-3 ER will refurbish somehow.

As an end note, my remark will just remind the boeing readers that the most efficient/profitable transatlantic aircraft actually will not for sure be the 7E7 but in fact, you mentioned it FLYYUL, it is the 757 in 2 class...with winglets!!!


User currently offlineFLYACYYZ From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 1914 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5438 times:

BEIJING 21 -

Nobody would argue that the A333 would be the PREFERRED aircraft serving any potential new European route, but given the availability of aircraft and anticipated loads, as mentioned by others, I see the B763 in a J/Y configuration.

As far as 'beyond" destinations, such as India, AC's competitive advantage is the only non-stop service from North America, unless you were ulitmately considering secondary Indian markets besides DEL/BOM. This same commerical strategy would apply to BEY or THR, if those routes ever came to fruititon.

In terms of comparing cabin amentities between aircraft types, AC's entire fleet will be retrofitted with new seating including individual IFE's on every aircraft from the CRJ700 up. Therefore comfortwise, seating should be similar on the entire international fleet.

But we all agree on one thing. It would be great touching down in GVA again!!



Above and Beyond
User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5411 times:

Indeed my fear was, they open up the route with an equipment that fits to the potential of the market but not in term of the customer demand in term of comforf. And so the A333 would be the only option. Now you said the are going to newly equiped their cabin with state of the art devices in order to increase quality of service proposed, so I'm confident a 762-3ER would do great on that leg...



User currently offlineLX23 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 347 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 5228 times:

But according to a GVA airport recent survey, YUL is one of the most demanded destinations among JFK, Tokyo and London
Just a remark on Beijing's post... have you noticed that out of those four destinations, only ONE has direct service? I've always wanted LX to succeed, but sometimes, they deserve to fall on their ass for some of management's stupidity (losing LHR amongst other cases, as wel as refusal to start ANY OTHER intercon routes ex GVAAngry KU is apparently not doing too badly on the ORD route... now if only LX would launch a service to one of these places...


User currently offlineAC7E7 From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 666 posts, RR: 22
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 5163 times:

I agree, I don't know if we will see a A330, maybe just at the beginning. I see a B763 from YUL-GVA.

User currently offlineNoise From United States of America, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 1855 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4903 times:

How would a non-stop YUL-GVA route affect LX's YUL-ZRH route?

User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4579 times:

LX 23, you said KU is making some money by redirecting their ORD-AMS-KWI service via GVA. Do you think they are going to increase frequencies.

By the way, swiss CEO declared its company needs to explode every taboo. Will the reaffectation of GVA in a long-haul network strategy be more significant soon...?

But I agree that YUL could even outperform JFK in term of high revenue route and will place the YUL-ZRH in grave danger, very grave danger as YUL is the natural market out of western Switzerland.


User currently offlineLX23 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 347 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 4079 times:

Beijing:
Due to the current KU fleet size and the amount of flights they currently have, it is doubtful that they will be able to add freqs. KU currently has only 4 A343s, and these serve:

KWI-BKK-MNL 6x weekly
KWI-GVA-ORD 2x weekly
KWI-FRA 3x weekly
KWI-JKT 2x weekly
(I think this covers it, though I'm almost sure I'm missing something)

GVA returning to more than 1 daily long-haul might be too late if they don't do it quickly enough, as companies eventually start taking up some of the market (for example AC, Etihad, Emirates, KU).
Not to be a ZRH-basher, but I do think that one of the taboos the LX chairman was talking about was dropping some intercons ex-ZRH in exchange for more ex-GVA (or even BSL, though I'd stick with GVA for the assessment).
YUL on its own will probably be quite profitable, though I am not going to go as far as saying that it will be more profitable than JFK. After all, there seems to be enough room in the NYC for more than just a daily flight (LX daily, CO 6x weekly during the winter)


User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 5010 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 4040 times:

ZRH is good connect point, so im sure that GVA represents a minority amount of traffic carried on YULZRH.



User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3969 times:

Lx23,
Thank you for your comments and remarks. Indeed I would bet that CEO Franz enclines to rely on datas and other figures and not to concentrate every efforts to justify minimum use of a state of the art terminal in ZRH. In addition to that I continue to say that ( and I would bet that we will see soon a second swiss long-haul aircraft operation down there in GVA ) The questions are what, when and how.

What : Will they convince AA to make a daily link with ORD or DFW...and so will probably kill KU for good or a BBJ/ACJ outsourced to private air.

When : As the quaterly reports are featuring good results for swiss. They are back on track and aiming to lease some additional aircrafts, I would bet summer 05 as the departing time.

How : There we are. With the crisis going on between them and the travel agent community I'm not so sure they will find sufficient back up there to get those flights at high exposure... But I can be wrong.

In fact I'm deeply convinced that swiss is working in silent to come up with a project. Whatever it is I see a codeshare with AA.

Just in addition to your KU A343 planning list, they do operate a 5 weekly JFK service as well. I guess 2 are via Heathrow and 3 nonstop.

Well I seem to have been to much extatic mentionning the profitability of a YUL flight. Indeed GVA is not a newcomer into double daily service with NYC. SR, TW, PA, DL and CO have experienced the route but I'm sure that the reactivity to market is essential here. I mean whatever the yield, the number of passenger and cargo lift, all of this depends of your financial structure and product.

Gosh I can't wait to see AC coming to GVA!!!!!


User currently offlineHB-IWC From Indonesia, joined Sep 2000, 4516 posts, RR: 72
Reply 23, posted (10 years 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3844 times:

There is most certainly a market for GVA-YUL because of the francophone traffic, so an AC flight would work, for sure during the busy summer months. The question remains whether the flight can remain in the black during the winter months. I don't think a seasonal flight, which is what AC is doing in so many European markets, is desirable for this market.

On a related note, is AC exploring the possibility of a similar BRU-YUL flight? I know that SN has been thinking about it. Last time AC tried was around 1995, with 3 miserable weekly flights and only for one season. The route was, for obvious reasons, a complete failure. But Sabena made it work, when they started operations a couple of years later with MD11 and later A332/333/342/343.



User currently offlineBeijing21 From Switzerland, joined Nov 2004, 83 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (10 years 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3627 times:

Well, I see passion stirred up down here.

Let's get this back on track.
I think either LX or AC will gain if they decide to open up the leg. swiss has not the adequate equipment A332. So AC left and we agree that the AC product, with cabin refurbishment, will make the 763ER the appropriate stuff to operate.

The question remains : When the official announcement will be made ?
I suspect in January for summer 05.
Comments ?


25 LX23 : well....it just so happens that a goodly portion of those 40-60 pax ex-GVA bound for YUL are C-class pax, meaning they could fill an AC 763 C-class ca
26 RJ100 : Don't want to sound pessimistic but when CEO Franz speaks about "breaking taboos", then he certainly does not mean good things. He means things like o
27 Post contains images LX23 : Actually RJ, I both agree and disagree with you. when CEO Franz speaks about "breaking taboos", then he certainly does not mean good things I will mos
28 YUL332LX : ''...then a lot of them will keep flying Swiss, LH, BA, CO etc. '' Exactly. ...and AF, AC (via CDG), etc. That's why this route is a bit risky for AC.
29 Scf158 : What about if AC and LX where to codeshare on the route?
30 YUL332LX : LX is already flying to YUL so I don't see them getting into a codeshare with AC...
31 RJ100 : LX23 I see your point. I agree with you that people would use the direct flight but as mentioned above this takes time. And during this time AC cannot
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Canada Back To GVA? posted Fri Jul 15 2005 15:23:04 by Legallykev
Air Canada Back To FCO posted Tue Apr 5 2005 23:04:19 by YYZACGUY
Air Canada Back To San Diego? posted Sun Aug 22 2004 01:27:08 by Hockey55dude
Air Canada Back To MCI, STL, MSY posted Wed Sep 3 2003 00:54:41 by MSYtristar
Air Canada Service To NGO Canceled? posted Mon Jan 30 2006 03:21:03 by Simairlinenet
Royal Air Maroc Back To Beirut .. posted Sat Nov 5 2005 01:49:10 by MSYYZ
Air Canada Seeks To Operate Some USAirways Flights posted Mon Oct 10 2005 19:52:02 by KarlB737
Air Canada Coming To Memphis posted Wed Oct 5 2005 01:20:13 by Dc10heaven
Air India Back To TLV posted Sun Aug 28 2005 20:45:56 by Amirs
Air Canada Coming To YHM posted Fri Jun 3 2005 04:27:47 by Fly_yhm