Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Decision For Extra UK-India Flight Expected 3 DEC  
User currently offlineOliver18 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 13 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2324 times:

According to business traveller the decision is expected to favour Virgin and Bmi. Seems a bit cheeky that BMI should get anything considering they have never shown any interest in India prior to the new biliateral agreement. Virgin have shown their dedications for the last 4 years!!
Does it seem fair that 3 UK airlines are competing in India, yet only one indian carrier (air India) to compete against 3 UK airlines. I think BMI should if waited until the next bilateral agreement before they get thei own rights cause Virgin had to wait 4 years. It looks as though they are stealing Virgin's chances.
Just my opinion

see link:
http://www.businesstraveller.com/default.asp?Page=3&PUB=67&ISS=11290&SID=451282

or got to :
http://www.businesstraveller.com
then click on title: Airlines await CAA decision on India flights

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMANmatt From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 969 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2311 times:

I read in this months edition of Aviation News magazine that bmi want to serve mumbai daily and bangalore 6 weekly. Dont know how they plan on this, this would require two a/c being based at LHR, and i cant see them giving up two daily flights at MAN just yet for this flights, maybe IAD would go, but definitely not ORD or the recently started LAS, plus BGI, etc. Mind you, this is bmi we are talking about here, so anything could be possible!

MANmatt


User currently offlineMrNiji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

Does it seem fair that 3 UK airlines are competing in India, yet only one indian carrier (air India) to compete against 3 UK airlines.

What a weird thought... why shouldn't it be fair if only one Indian carrier has the permission from the Indian side to offer flights to GB? Sometimes, an overdrive in competition can be harmful for the industry per se..

By the way, Oliver18, welcome to a.net.. just saw that it was your first post here...  Big grin

[Edited 2004-12-02 08:13:47]

User currently offlineAIR MALTA From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2501 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2211 times:

That is really bad for BA. I tought BA would have the chance to finally add flights to India. I think BA struggles with those bilateral agreement compared to the likes of LH and AF. BA can not add flights to India, to Shangai, to the USA, etc because of those bilateral and as soon as something changes, it has to compete with two airline. No wonder why AF or LH are now ahead of BA because in their local markets, they have no competition at all.


Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2203 times:

Does it seem fair that 3 UK airlines are competing in India, yet only one indian carrier to compete against 3 UK airlines

To the contrary, currently there is only ONE British carrier (BA) designated but TWO Indian carriers (since VS is using AI's rights).




User currently offlineMrNiji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2197 times:

but TWO Indian carriers (since VS is using AI's rights).

 Big thumbs up VS an Indian carrier.. .very positive way of seeing it.. From 3 Decemer, things could change... maybe we will have another Indian carrier with BD Big grin



Sean, did you receive my email regarding my Aviation Text? would be nice if you get in touch with me soon so I know when I can complete it.. cheers

(sorry for the personal message)


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2192 times:

Hi Subin, I haven't received any emails from you since 7 November. If you have sent since then please send again. My apologies!

User currently offlineTrident2e From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2178 times:

Oliver18 - seems a bit odd to say that an airline should be penalised for not publicly shouting about wanting to operate a route it has not got authority for. Using your logic no airline would ever be able to operate any route unless they had wanted to for years!

User currently offlineAIR MALTA From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2501 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2160 times:

They should give 7 flights each to BA, BD and VS.


Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offlineMadhatter From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1980 times:

I think you have to look at the airlines with the most feed and that have the most to loose from missing out on this opportunity. With Virgin granted they have a viable argument that they cannot operate their 3xweekly service to Delhi profitably but they have gained a lot from the CAA with regards to Shanghai and they can grow in other areas and do not face the same problems in competing internationally as BA does. BD whilst they do have a large feed at LHR what with their own network and also their Star Alliance network from UA and SK for example they do not have any LHR international service and so this would be an anomaly in their network and one which would not benefit them as much as BA.nBD can and do feed their international traffic successfully into both LHs and SKs markets out of LHR. If BA were sidelined majorly in this area they would be at a severe competitve disadvantage to the European airlines that they are trying to compete with. LH has expanded into Bangolore and are looking at expanding into other areas and increasing frequencies in existing markets which will take traffic away from BA unless they can keep up. Not being biased towards any airline but VS and BA in my opinion should be the airlines that gain the most from these additional frequencies.

User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1971 times:

But as I understand there is no indication that the outcome will be for BMI and VS. It says only that the paper or their readers prefer to give these rights to BMI and VS.

Or have I understood it wrong?


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1969 times:

IF VS and BD do get these rights expect BA to appeal. Whatever the outcome there will be probably be an appeal by one side or another. Personally I favour BA and VS getting these rights for the reasons expressed above, namely that AF and LH are stealing a march on BA on a European level and simply allowing BD into the market in the name of competition on a UK-India level would be short sighted. Plus, to be fair, VS have come out with some favourable decisions in the past couple of years - Shanghai, Port Harcourt, Sydney (Pending I know, but BA might have fancied these rights itself given that QF holds all 28 Australian frequencies). And while VS initially lost out with Las Vegas after BA got Denver, it got there when BA dropped PIT.

Basically I hope the CAA take a wider view than simply UK-India and take into account European competition. VS daily to BOM and DEL with BA operating an additional four frequencies to MAA and three weekly to Bangalore would open up new routes and add competition. If more frequencies are allowed next yaer after new talks then look at allowing BD into the market, but not one so restricted as now.

Lol, but then I'm jumping the gun before the announcement!



Let's Go British Caledonian!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Aircraft For UK Royal Flight? posted Sun Apr 3 2005 22:35:16 by FlyCaledonian
UK-India: Up For Grabs! posted Thu Nov 11 2004 10:11:35 by Scotron11
Graphical Flight Tracker For The UK? posted Sat Feb 15 2003 23:40:26 by DC-10 Levo
NEw And Increase India Flight For BA posted Tue Apr 9 2002 06:04:48 by Jiml1126
New Carrier For The UK? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 00:38:57 by Luv2fly
Package Prompts Return Of Air India Flight posted Tue Sep 19 2006 13:50:02 by YYZSaabGuy
FI: Airbus Goes For Extra Width posted Mon Jul 24 2006 19:49:47 by Leelaw
Will Fliers Pay For Extra Space On The 787? posted Fri May 26 2006 19:41:01 by BoomBoom
Advance Passenger Screening For Flights To India posted Fri Apr 28 2006 05:16:09 by Egghead
UK Friendly Flight Tracking. posted Sun Mar 26 2006 13:24:28 by Chuffy