Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LON - MAN How Many Airlines / Will It Last?  
User currently offlineStargoldlhr From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4266 times:

Well for the last two years Ive watch the mass profits and loads being made by BMI and BA on their LGW / LHR to MAN operations...

in 2002 last minute fares could be had for av £50 return
and after the railways went to pot in 2003/4 the fares rose to over £180 return for last minute fares this summer.

I just noticed that finally Easyjet have discovered this (Just as the railways are complete) and so have Jet2 for ops from LGW-MAN.

With VLM's LCY-MAN operations also... this means 5 airlines flying around 30 flights a day between London and Manchester..... with LGW offering around 12 of them !!!

is there this much demand ? Or will this turn into the LAX-SFO/OAK shuttle situation pre sept11th, where DL/WN/UA/AS were all beating it out with $60 roundtrips 30 times a day followed by a bust where it all went to $300 !

So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7808 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4227 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At the moment, the frequencies look like this:
LHR: BA 12 Mon-Fri, 8 Sat+Sun. BD 7 Mon-Fri, 4 Sat 6 Sun
LGW: BA 7 Mon-Fri, 5 Sat+Sun (LS 3 from Jan)
STN: T3 3 Mon-Fri
LCY: VG 11 Mon-Fri, 2 Sun

As to whether it will last, I don't think it will e.g. all literature I've seen suggests that the LHR run will be used by the connecting traffic only so perhaps frquencies will reduce slightly (an unhealthy proportion of passengers still fly to LHR/LGW before going overseas!).


User currently offlineEGNM-LBA From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4076 times:

I would imagine that the ratio of inter-lining to O&D traffic on MAN-LHR.LGW is probably lower than services from MAN to places like DXB, PHL, EWR, ATL, IAD, ORD, KUL, SIN etc. It is the inter-lining traffic that sustains these services, so nothing "unhealthy" about it at all.

User currently offline7LBAC111 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 2566 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4028 times:

just noticed that finally Easyjet have discovered this

What have EasyJet announced/noticed?


Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
User currently offlineMinmiester From Australia, joined May 2001, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4014 times:

Not quite on topic, but I've always found it strange that the LAX-SFO run wasn't able to sustain those numbers of frequencies, same going for what I assume you believe this short-lived era of high frequency MAN-London. More so on the LAX-SFO run, as rail is not a major competitor, and its a run that makes driving not palatable. Is there any reason why these domestic routes cannot seem to sustain high amounts of frequency, or is something like MEL-SYD (which, as an Aussie, I guess I am used to) - where there are some 34 daily flights on QF alone, on a mixture of 734, 738, 763, A333 and 744 equipment (mostly 763 it seems) - just some sort of weird anomaly? Combined with the 6 daily flights on JQ and 24 daily flights on DJ, this is some 64 daily flights between two cities of "only" 3.6m and 4.1m, and is the world's 3rd busiest air-route by passengers carried, yet the route is a profit printer, with even more frequency probably welcome rather than unsustainable.

The difficulty to sustain frequency on something like MAN to London can be understandable, given the ground links between the two cities and the closer distance between the two cities, but what about between San Francisco and Los Angeles, where the cities are further apart and ground transportation is out of the question for those after a semblance of comfort and time management?



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Many Airlines Will Go Down? posted Tue Mar 18 2003 03:10:11 by Mbj-11
How Many Airlines Will Operate A340-500 And -600? posted Fri Oct 18 2002 23:51:59 by Hkniceguy
Ghana International - How Long Will It Last? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 15:24:33 by ChiefT
PHL-BOS Route: How Many Airlines Have Flown It? posted Fri Jul 9 2004 15:34:17 by PHLBOS
Midwest MCI-SFO: How Long Will It Last? posted Mon Apr 28 2003 20:58:14 by MSYtristar
Tu-204-how Many Airlines Are Using It? posted Fri Mar 1 2002 14:54:51 by Silverstreak
SkyValue Airlines - Will It Work? posted Tue Oct 24 2006 22:58:21 by Nopeotone
Quick Question, How Many Airlines In The US? posted Mon May 15 2006 02:49:30 by Cadet57
How Many Airlines Still Use Tail Logo Lights? posted Tue Nov 22 2005 20:36:19 by ToTheStars
How Many Airlines For 772LR? posted Sun May 8 2005 10:48:43 by Lazyshaun