Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air China To Order 23 New A Jets  
User currently offlineMacc From Austria, joined Nov 2004, 1031 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 7624 times:

presently on www.orf.at (austrian official tv website):

china is about to sign an agreement for 23 airbus jets (19 A319 + 4 A330).
fot a total value of 1 billion euro. until 2006 air china wants to add a total of 41 new planes to its fleet.

also the A380 will be discussed.

in the end, its all about politics...


I exchanged political frustration with sexual boredom. better spoil a girl than the world
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHeavierthanair From Switzerland, joined Oct 2000, 786 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 7547 times:

G'day

No 330'ies, 320 series only, but still good news.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1518&ncid=1518&e=1&u=/afp/20041206/bs_afp/china_germany_airbus_041206114943

Cheers

Peter



"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." (Albert Einstein, 1879
User currently offlineGreaser From Bahamas, joined Jan 2004, 1101 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 7479 times:

The Chinese are sweetening Europe up before they demand the arms embrago is fully dismantled.


Now you're really flying
User currently offlineRoblondon70 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 7434 times:

Schroder visiting Beijing!!

User currently offlineN754PR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7170 times:

Yes Greaser....

America would never do anything like that  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7128 times:

N754PR:

Que? Rest assured, the U.S. has no interest in seeing the arms embargo to China lifted. And I guarantee you that items with U.S. content will not be sold there. Which pretty much eliminates any U.K. product, and much of the product from other nations.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineKnoxibus From France, joined Aug 2007, 258 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7062 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

the U.S. has no interest in seeing the arms embargo to China lifted

Exactely the same non-interest when relation with Lybia were re-opened and that they suddenly bought BCA products.....

And when refering to "items", please make sure you are talking about weapons, because they are a few products with US built components over there, just a few....

Anyway, if they can send man into space, what's the point of preventing them acquiring technology they will anyway have sooner or later?



No matter what anybody tells you, words and ideas can change the world.
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7058 times:

Solnabo:

No, it's not. China is regarded as a security issue. Apparently, you are overly cynical or conspiracy-minded. But you also haven't been paying attention to policy news. Did you know that there is a law prohibiting launch of U.S.-manufactured satellites (which, as a proportion, dominate those being sold) on Long March boosters? And there are no plans for it to be repealed.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7044 times:

Knoxibus:

Yes, I am, of course, referring to armaments. Sure, there are now being U.S. airliners being pitched to Libya. However, we are not selling them F-22s and the like.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineSolnabo From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 850 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6954 times:


China is in desperate need of steel, so I guess EU export it as a X-masgift  Big grin

*God Jul*

Micke



Airbus SAS - Love them both
User currently offlineAgill From Sweden, joined Feb 2004, 1006 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6879 times:

Solnabo: What on earth are you talking about. Of course USA don't want the weapons embargo lifted.

User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8195 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6829 times:

It's very simple fellas. The EU sees the future going through China. The latest US administration "going at it alone" policy only helped reenforce Europe's position. China is the next superpower and European nations are vying to establish good relations with them. It won't be long until you see Germany as a full blown member of the UN security council.

User currently offlineB2443 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 703 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6759 times:

It gets interesting when an typical Air China thread turns into a political debate. Political deals are made with large economic ones all the time, with or without China.

Don't Chirac and Schroeder go to OTHER countries?

Maybe if Tony Blair visited China, China would buy its beef products...but again unless Tony was "desperate" enough.

And don't think Boeing, GM and other big American Co's don't lobby Washington to sell stuff to China.

CA needs airplanes that could benefit French/Germen manufacturing jobs in a great deal, which in return will be supporting their governing parties to get elected or re-elected. These are big boy's games and no innocence on either side.


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 6724 times:

Airbazar:

They already are a full-blown member of the Security Council. If you mean, having veto power at the U.N. in general, I doubt it.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineLuisde8cd From Pitcairn Islands, joined Aug 2004, 2570 posts, RR: 31
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 6683 times:

They already are a full-blown member of the Security Council.

Whats ur definition of "full-blown member"? Germany currently as of Dec 2004 holds a ROTATING seat in the Security Council, just as Chile, Algeria or Benin per say. Im not familiar with the date when Germany began its term in the Sec. Council but it will expire 2 years after it started.

There are only 5 full blown members in the Security Council, also called the P-5 (permanent five) which are US, Russia, UK, China and France.


User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 6683 times:

N328KF, no, Germany's not a full-blown member of the Security Council - they are a member of the UN, and they're currently on rotating membership in the security council: but Germany has maintained that it would like to have a permanent seat, which would include the same veto-power that the other members have.

Although, I really have to ask this question: Airbazar, what does this particular point have to do with the fact that Air China ordered Airbus planes?


Anyhow - I hope we'll be hearing something about the respective A380 and B7e7 purchases from China soon...

Regards,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 6584 times:

See, I see a distinction between being:

1) On the UNSC in an observer role (even Switzerland has held this, I think.)
2) On the UNSC as a member (a la Germany, Chile, etc.)
3) On the UNSC as a member with a U.N. Permanent Seat (the big 5)



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 17, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 6527 times:

N328KF, the different levels of UN Membership are:

1) Observer status in the General Assembly
2) Full Member in the General Assembly
3) Permanent Member of the Security Council

Out of the General Assembly, 10 member states are selected as members of the Security Council on a rotating basis - the current makeup of the council can be found here:

http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_members.html


Now, please, let's get back to China ordering planes - this sidetrack really has nothing to do with this thread.

Regards,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineACAfan From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 710 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 6262 times:

Germany Seeks to End EU's China Arms Ban

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-china-germany,0,1871216,print.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines



Freddie Laker ... May be at peace with his maker ... But he is a persona non grata ... with IATA
User currently offlineFCKC From France, joined Nov 2004, 2348 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 6199 times:

Has someone info regarding this order.Is it 319s and 320s , or 319s and 330s ? Air China has signed recently a letter of intent for more than 10 330s.
Is it the confirmation of this MOU ?


User currently offlineFCKC From France, joined Nov 2004, 2348 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5589 times:

After some searches , it seems to be 319s and 330s , making three Chinese airlines having ordered this beauty.CZ , MU and now CA..........when Hainan Al will follow ???????



User currently offlineIadbgo From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 206 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5338 times:

Rest assured the United States is not going to sell any military weapons to China. We are barely willing to sell anything to Taiwan right now...let alone China. As for why we don't sell rockets etc to a nation that can put a man in space? ... because our rockets are better...it really is that simple. Rockets are dual use systems...means you can stick a nuke on it...ours are more reliable and more accurate...so it is silly to think that we would actually sell those products to China...or let anyone else sell them

IADBGO


User currently offlineB2443 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 703 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5160 times:

Truth's out, China has agreed to purchase 23 A320 series airplanes. Full details at http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/07/content_2302665.htm

Besides A320 orders, China will be involved in A350 program with up to 5% work share.


User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4691 posts, RR: 14
Reply 23, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4794 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

>We are barely willing to sell anything to Taiwan right now..

not even the 10 billion in diesel subs , 3 billion in Patriot Pac3 missiles, 1.5 billion in P3 orions the US are trying desperately to get their legislature to approve, not to mention the over 1 billion in link 16/jtids etc and the 3/4 billion in early warning missile radars. Oh, did I forget the billion $ a piece Aegis destroyers Trent Lott wants to sell them? And Boeing are still hoping like heck to sell them a billion and half in Apache choppers and keep the line open. But they shot themselves in the foot last year when they insulted their Vice President by kowtowing to Beijing and not letting her visit Boeing even after the visit was arranged, so Bell will probably get that one especially since AIDC is already making the tails for the Marine AH1Z/1Y and AIDC and Bell go back to the 60s. Don't expect the Taiwanese presidential ofice to be calling the CI board and putting pressure on them to split their orders with Boeing like the last 2 times either when they went for A340s and A330s when Boeing got almost 20 744s out of it!

And the EU arms embargo only applies to "weapons", not eg radars which is why the British got away with selling the PLAN the only half decent AEW radar system they have in service right now!

[Edited 2004-12-07 05:16:04]

User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12380 posts, RR: 47
Reply 24, posted (9 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4300 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's on Airbus' website now -

http://www.airbus.com/dynamic/media/press_releases.asp#1626



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air China To Order B777? posted Wed Nov 1 2006 08:37:41 by Smeagol
Air China To Order 20 Airbus A330-200 posted Thu Jul 21 2005 18:15:25 by Beaucaire
Rumour: Air China To Order A380s @ Paris posted Sun Jun 8 2003 14:08:32 by Teahan
Air China To Release New 'Olympic Mascots' Livery posted Fri Aug 25 2006 13:22:58 by Carnoc
Air China To Sell $2.7B In Stock For New Planes posted Fri Feb 10 2006 11:57:15 by YOWza
Air Asia To Order 80 Short-haul Jets posted Sat Aug 7 2004 01:19:23 by Horus
PIA-Air China To Code Share Under New Agreement posted Fri Mar 12 2004 15:37:57 by Airmale
Air India Set To Order 38 New Aircraft posted Mon Sep 16 2002 05:41:16 by Jaysit
Air China To Madrid And Sao Paulo? posted Wed Oct 11 2006 18:54:54 by 777way
LH And Air China To Build A380 Hangar posted Fri Sep 22 2006 15:55:23 by Manni