Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Northwest Cleared For 3rd Airlink Partner  
User currently offlineJano From Slovakia, joined Jan 2004, 823 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4971 times:

http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/stories/2004/12/06/story2.html

The deal, which was approved by Northwest pilots a month ago, gives Northwest $265 million in labor concessions, which Northwest said it needed to compete in the grueling airline industry.

It also lets Northwest add 40 new 50-seat regional jets to its network -- but only if they're flown by a carrier other than current affiliates Mesaba Airlines (owned by MAIR Holdings Inc. of Minneapolis) or Pinnacle Airlines Corp. of Memphis.


...

Though it might seem strange for NWA pilots to negotiate a deal that allows the airline to expand using other carriers, observers said the union is hoping the deal strengthens Northwest overall. In documents describing the deal to pilots, the Northwest Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) said gaining a new regional partner would give Northwest "offensive and defensive marketing capability" should another major carrier drop out.


The Widget Air Line :)
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7343 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4911 times:

In reality, its a lot more complicated than the article states.

User currently offlineGeg2rap From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 847 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4874 times:

hmmmm...backup plan for air wisky??
Question to NW people, is there preference for Mesaba/Pinnacle pilots to move up to the big boys? (when that day comes again). Interesting they would do this too, why wouldn't they say they have to go to existing airlink partners?


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6482 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4863 times:

PSU.DTW.SCE:

Care to elaborate?



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineBigtidi From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4847 times:

could it be a new code share for Mesa Airlines?

User currently offlineN801NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 744 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4791 times:

IIRC, in the event another airline fails, NW could quickly sign up a third Airlink partner to fly pax from the defunct carriers hub(s) to NW's hubs. ie, PHL-DTW, CLT-MEM, etc. NWALPA is betting that that could lead to more flying for them from the Hubs.

User currently offlineM404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2220 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4672 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Might also yet another way for NW to use the third carrier as leverage in future bargaining talks with pilots and owners?

Interesting ideas for quick entry to PIT. Perhaps Independence might even be in the sights.

What I don't understand about the quick logistics scenario is that say NW has the 40 CRJs and crews. Those acft are not going to be delivered all at the same time. Bombardier is already slowing down the lines. What would they do in the meantime while waiting to pounce on a vacant hub? Only the 10 CRJs for Pinnacle have been ordered since this signing. Could this actually be for an airline already in existence?

This is really interesting when coupled with Northwests long professed feelings that ownership of a link partner is not as desired a contracting relationship.

[Edited 2004-12-06 21:37:05]


Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
User currently offlineATWZW170 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 904 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4526 times:

Back up plan for Air Wisconsin...I hope so. I'd love to see AWAC fly for NW. I know it's only 40 planes but if we keep the UA flights and pick up NW...that would be nice! And if god forbid we lose the UA flying...the NW routes would ensure that some of us stay on board.


Success is getting what you want...happiness is liking what you get
User currently offlineOH-LGA From Denmark, joined Oct 1999, 1436 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4445 times:

We're placing a bid for the flying as well... it will be quite interesting to see who gets it in the end  Smile

Kai



Head in the clouds... yet feet planted firmly on the ground.
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 4382 times:

Maybe IAir could be it......

But in reality, Air Wisconsin could definitely be in the running. I doubt Mesa is looking heavily at adding another airline to run flights for, but perhaps they could operate for NW Airlink under the Midway name and O.C.


User currently offlineRCS763av From Colombia, joined Jun 2004, 4373 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4241 times:

Maybe Air Wisconsin should look at the deal, since they have been dropped by Airtran and now United?

User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9378 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4172 times:

It sounds like the pilot union is allowing NW to take over express work if a mainline carrier liquidates. It seems like NW will assume Chautauqua or another one of US Airways Express carriers operations in the event US fails. It will allow NW to take over a lot of the business of US if they fail. It is a good business plan because it would allow NW to be the first in the market to help all of the frequent flyers of US in their hubs. In the long run this could allow NW to establish a hub or increase flying in a defunct US Airways network. This could be a good thing because it would lead to growth of not only NW express service, but of mainline flights as well. I doubt the pilots want NW to just add another express carrier to their network unless a big carrier liquidates. Hopefully this doesn't happen, but people are acknowledging that it is possible and creating contingency planes.


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineIAHERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 677 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4119 times:

I'd put my money on Expressjet!!! I think they have the inside track.

IAHERJ

P.S. I don't work for them anymore. Just a hunch.




Actually flown: EMB-120 EMB-145 B717 B737 B757 B767
User currently offlineSwadispatcher From United States of America, joined May 2004, 427 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4101 times:

ExpressJet has been making uniforms and airplanes more "generic" and several employees have told me that the rumour going around is that they have been looking for a second "partner airline"...



Maintain 2300 until Boiler, cleared for the VOR-A approach, report BATLE inbound..
User currently offlineMojo89 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 123 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4082 times:

Maybe Air Wisconsin should look at the deal, since they have been dropped by Airtran and now United?

RCS763av-
Air Wisconsin has not been dropped by United. They have simply put Air Wisconsin's portion of the flying out for bid.



When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7343 posts, RR: 28
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3923 times:

Its more or less as RoseFlyer states it.

The agreement allows NW to pick up a regional affiliate virtually overnight in the event of a major airline collapse.

In the event that US or (UA....less likely) goes under, a virtual free-for-all will erupt for some of the more viable markets and instantly a glut of regional feed instantly comes on to the market. Thus NW can come in on short notice and beginning picking up new routes.

Either XJ or PNCL have the resources to do this since all of their aircraft are already committed.

No, AirWhisky is still with United for the time being, despite the Request for bids from United. United is a mess with their regional affiliates.

No, its not ExpressJet. Does ExpressJet have 40 ERJ's lying around? No. And who is going to finance them. This is solely if 40 RJ's suddenly come on the market, and NW sees profitable routes to fly them.

Whoever wrote this article isn't very smart. NW WILL NOT begin regional feed out of SLC or LAS, that is nowhere even close to fitting their business model.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7343 posts, RR: 28
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3869 times:

I meant that XJ or PNCL dont have the ability to do such a thing.

You can argue that NW mainline pilots somewhat shafted the people at Mesaba and PNCL, but this contract is only valid for two years, and I'm sure the language will change at that point.

The regionals are no fun these days, its just like Wal-Mart, who can do it the cheapest and be the biggest whore and backstab your friends.


User currently onlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5845 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3786 times:

"The regionals are no fun these days, its just like Wal-Mart, who can do it the cheapest and be the biggest whore and backstab your friends."

I don't know about the two latter items, but cost does play a big factor -- not to mention flexibility and aircraft performance.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineATWZW170 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 904 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 3152 times:

I didn't think that Expressjet could bid for the business, don't they have something in their contract that says they can only fly for CO until 2006?

As far as OO (skywest), I'm not so sure they are going to go for it either. How can they bid on both the AWAC routes that were put out for bid and the NW routes, that would be streching themselves rather thin.

I can see RP (Chautauqua) making a bid, good company. They don't have all the overhead that we do here at AWAC, but AWAC would fit NW's modle better.

I would hope that NW would NOT even listen to YV (Mesa). I'm sorry but it's Mesa that makes the Regionals like Wal-mart. Have several different airlines under their banner, all paying crap wages.

But, just my opinion.



Success is getting what you want...happiness is liking what you get
User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3276 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

AFAIK, ExpressJet's agreement with CO allows them to fly for another carrier. HOWEVER, if ExpressJet negotiates a lower price with the other carrier, CO has the right to pay the same rate. So in this race to the bottom on regional pricing, it might not be too good for ExpressJet to get in the game.

Comair? No way. Their labor costs are so high, even DL has passed over them for recent growth. You know NW is looking for the best deal. SkyWest is probably a more realistic bidder.

Chautauqua might have an inside track. Their CEO is the former CEO of Mesaba.

OTOH, NW is so conservative, if they can't get the deal they want, they might not do anything but accelerate delivery of their CRJ order. Everyone wants to grow, but hopefully the regionals will decide profits and stability are better than getting a lousy contract with NWA.

And all this is probably moot if US somehow survives. My hunch is that this is a "just in case" plan to grab markets if US or UA fails. If they don't, it won't be needed. NW has plenty of planes in the pipeline that they can tap.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7343 posts, RR: 28
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks ago) and read 2467 times:

Exactly TOLtommy.....

The key part here is that NW has not put out a bid for additional flying.
All it states is the provision is in the mainline pilot's contract, among a whole slew of other provisions. Purely, should the situation arise.

As it stands now, NW really does not need too many more CRJ's at their current hubs. There is simply nowhere to put them. DTW is almost max-ed out spacewise for the regionals until the new concourse C is rebuit.

Also, the big wildcard is the NWA70 issue, the 70 seat issue that will begin negotiation in Feb. Mainline pilots want the 70 seater flying, but NW will only do so if it is profitable.

Thus 70 seaters are in NW's not so distant future. There are a bunch of routes currently being flown with 50 seaters that could be flown effectively with 70 seaters, thus when the time comes, freeing up those 50 seaters to do other things.

Time will tell, but remember that planes aren't free. No regional, unless they are really dumb, is suddenly going to get a whole bunch of RJ's with the hope of NW potentially flying them.

For the time being, there is no one out there that has a bunch of RJ's to fly for NW. 6 months from now, that story may be different. I just don't see any regional ordering new aircraft just to fly for them, I see this scenario occuring if someone is out on the street due to their contract ending with someone else.


User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7504 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks ago) and read 2446 times:

I would hope that NW would NOT even listen to YV (Mesa). I'm sorry but it's Mesa that makes the Regionals like Wal-mart. Have several different airlines under their banner, all paying crap wages.

But, just my opinion.


I wouldnt expect Mesa to really bid for NW, from what ive heard (not sure if its true or not) that NW and Mesa corporate guys have met before and didnt get a long what-so-ever. I know most go to the cheapest, but I know NW has standards, and I think Mesa is far below those.



"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2367 times:

Now that I think about it, if US Airways does go under, I'd put my money on Mesa becoming the new NW Airlink partner. Chautauqua would probably just start doing additional Delta Connection and American Connection work, as both airlines would probably want to add service or start service on former US Airways/US Airways Express routes, and with Chautauqua currently operating for those airlines, it'd be the quick and easy way to do it. BTW, how many a/c does Mesa currently have operating under the US Airways Express banner? I could see them transferring some of those a/c over to AW Express if US Airways folds. But here's an interesting thought, what about PSA and Piedmont if US Airways goes under? Logically, US Airways would probably start selling off assets a few months prior to filing Ch. 7; they've had assets quote/unquote on the market for awhile now (US Airways Shuttle, gates at various NE airports), and during the failed breakup/merger of US with UA and AA, they had made a deal with ACA to acquire the wholly owned regionals. Perhaps as a last ditch move, US sells PSA and Piedmont to Mesa for some quick cash?

User currently offlineATWZW170 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 904 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

So, tell me if I'm understanding things correctly....NW has the option of 40 more RJ's flown by another carrier but they have no plans of using them at this point?


Success is getting what you want...happiness is liking what you get
User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3276 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2090 times:

As PSU has said, NW has not put out an RFP to regionals to become the third partner.

25 ATWZW170 : Who says they have to put out a RFP? Can't they just go to a carrier and pick them? United didn't put our an RFP for Mesa and everyone else to join th
26 PSU.DTW.SCE : They don't have to put out a RFD, but they do have to enter into a contract. Call it what you want, but none currently exists between NW and anyone. T
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No Pacific Northwest RFPs For Frontier? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 07:08:03 by FATFlyer
Cleared For Takeoff, Irish Aviation Thread 17 posted Sun Oct 22 2006 14:22:38 by Kaitak
Porter Cleared For Takeoff posted Tue Sep 26 2006 22:38:59 by YOW
PUW Cleared For Larger Aircraft posted Tue Sep 12 2006 06:57:38 by RwSEA
Northwest Applies For DTW-ZIH; MEM-CZM posted Wed Jun 28 2006 04:30:25 by MAH4546
SA Finally Cleared For Star RTW Fares? posted Wed May 24 2006 07:44:34 by Kiwiandrew
Virgin Nigeria Cleared For Nigeria-US posted Thu Feb 16 2006 06:30:48 by EurostarVA
CO Looking For New RJ Partner posted Wed Dec 28 2005 17:10:12 by CALMSP
Continental Passes Northwest As U.S. #4 For RPMs posted Tue Dec 6 2005 22:45:16 by ScottB
WSJ: CO Forcasts Profit For 3rd Quarter posted Wed Oct 5 2005 03:44:12 by Lightsaber