Rj777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1471 posts, RR: 2 Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14597 times:
FoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2806 posts, RR: 5 Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14544 times:
This is pure speculation, but it could be for one of the Chinese airlines...they seem to be on a shopping spree at the moment (see recent Airbus order).
Na From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 9612 posts, RR: 10 Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14508 times:
1 billion for 5? That could also be an order for 772LRs. That aircraft´s price-tag is very high as well. Although, in Euros thats becoming cheaper and cheaper now...
N328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6222 posts, RR: 3 Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14497 times:
The Etihad order is old news. This surely is a new one.
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
Juventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2 Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14316 times:
I hope its Aeromexico. It could be an amazing combination (aircraft/livery)
Cb777 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1216 posts, RR: 4 Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14298 times:
Maybe continental for the upcoming new China routes.
Dont mind me I have had a couple of drinks too many.
Irishpower From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 377 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14213 times:
Hoya From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 361 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14212 times:
Boeing's website, under the orders reports, shows that the 5 unidentified 777s are 777-300ERs. The order was posted on November 30th, so Bloomberg is a little behind.
Juventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2 Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 14168 times:
Anxebla
I don't think its Aeromexico either, but I would like it to be. However, if they start servicing London, Frankfurt, and maybe Barcelona; they will need more than 3 777s
N328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6222 posts, RR: 3 Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 14106 times:
Hoya From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 361 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 14046 times:
N328KF,
On the orders page, click on "User Defined Reports" at the top. Then you can select the criteria for your search. For date range, I put Jan. - Dec. 2004, and for Model No. 777. It'll then give you a list of all the customers and models ordered. This list is updated at the end of each month.
Kalakaua From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, RR: 5 Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 14009 times:
I'm not sure if this is the same order, but there is an unidentified customer for 5 777-300ERs made on 30 November 2004, as Hoya mentioned...
I posted this thread, for that "official" feeling left by the media.
Check out "USER DEFINED REPORT" found on that O&D website.
Irishpower From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 377 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 13841 times:
I thought Air India was talking about ordering the 777. Could it be them?
Kalakaua From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, RR: 5 Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 13816 times:
I'm guessing Etihad has finally firmed up their orders for their intended 5 -300ERs proposed a couple of months ago...
Is it Etihad, everyone?
Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion.
AirplaneBoy From United States of America, joined May 2004, 542 posts, RR: 11 Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 13563 times:
I'm not up to date on who's planning to order what etc... But I'll take a guess-Singapore?
Bill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8320 posts, RR: 9 Reply 21, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 13191 times:
SQ placed an order for the 773ER earlier this year, and it was for more then 5 frames. 13-18 I believe is what the order was for which still probably has to become firm.
This is probably the Ethiad order being firmed up.
Robert74 From Austria, joined Oct 2004, 51 posts, RR: 0 Reply 23, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12820 times:
I wonder why they publish these figures. I mean in a booming economy this is good marketing but what when they get more and more behind Airbus (or vice versa)- then it would be better to keep the orders secret like most other companies (in other industries) do.
Is there a special reason why they publish the figures or has it just become customary ?
Gigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16215 posts, RR: 88 Reply 24, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12805 times:
The Thai order was not for ER frames.
N
25 ConcordeBoy: What about the Thai order ? TG never ordered 773ER I wonder why they publish these figures. Any number of reasons... nearly all of which are at the cl
26 ConcordeBoy: The Thai order was not for ER frames. *buzz* WRONG!
27 Iowa744fan: The CO comments made me ponder something. When is the decision about which carrier will get rights into China to be announced?
28 EA CO AS: Sheesh! Everyone knows those B-777-300ERs are destined for Alaska Airlines!
29 As739x: R...that what I'm saying....rumors are running all over the company about our new 777-300er's.....launch service will be the long rumored SEA-MSY ASSF
30 Clickhappy: well, I was told this afternoon at the China Airlines 747 Dreamliner event that this is the Ethiad order and will be announced next week.
31 Behramjee: http://www.boeing.com/news/breakingnews/2004/040910g.html Yes it does seem that this is merely the contract signing process of the EY order for 5 B 77
32 Ramerinianair: I think that CO would wait until the route to China were confirmed, otherwise, they would have the a/c and no prospective routes if it were a 773ER or
33 Lockheed1011: Way to go Boeing!!!!!!!!! Nothing like Boeing Commercial Bird, specially the 777.......
34 Greaser: Sheesh! Everyone knows those B-777-300ERs are destined for Alaska Airlines! I would think a 777-200LR is more applicable because they could make it AN
35 Britmex: NO, it is AVIACSA!!! Now that AM is dropping the CDG route 6A wants it!!!!! No, seriously it could really be AM since although they signed initially
36 Zkojh: could be NZ taking some of there options and making them into firm orders!!
37 MauriceB: what about KLM? they are happy with the 777's and with only 6 A330's on order to replace 12 767's it good be very much possible to replace them with 7
38 Greaser: MauriceB, good thought. I guess the 777-300ERs would be an excellent replacement/supplement to their 747s, and their brother AF operates the 777-300ER
39 FlyMeToTheMoon: Could it be US Airways? Just kidding.... Most likely one of the mainland China airlines or Ethiad.
40 Gigneil: *buzz* WRONG! Laugh out loud *SLAP* Right, you whore. The Thai order did not include any 777-300ERs. Before I get your response, I will go ahead and r
41 ConcordeBoy: Hmmm, we a little irritable this afternoon cher...? *passes Gigneil the Summer's Eve*
42 LegalEagle: Ok, I will confess, it is me. I ordered on for myself and 4 for the family. Just keep it on the down low. Thanks
43 Flying-Tiger: Either it is the firming up of the Eithad Airways order for 5 B777-300ERs (the Airbus orderbook should then show firmed up orders as well), or it is t
44 Clickhappy: you guys are silly, I already told you the answer to the question, but I guess you guys have all the answers
45 Sokol: You guys 5 B777-200/300ER they are for Alaska Airlines, because they could make flights from ANC to FRA, ANC to LHR, ANC to SYD, ANC to AMS, and some
46 AAplatnumflier: Could they be going to SQ to replace the A345's??
47 Bill142: Could they be going to SQ to replace the A345's?? I think we've established this is for the 773ER which SQ has ordered in a much larger quanitity then
48 LN-MOW: Obviously these people didn't bother to read reply 30 ....
49 PANAM_DC10: Well I'll go with Etihad. We all expected 5 firm from them and as Reply #30 states we could get the announcement this week. Flying-Tiger or it is the
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8320 posts, 
From Belgium, joined Aug 2003, 361 posts, 
From Austria, joined Oct 2004, 51 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
