Drerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 4906 posts, RR: 9 Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2368 times:
The error lies in that you listed 762s on some routes that are flown by the 764s. My guess is that you looked at the designation '767'--Continental list the 767-200 as 762, the 767-400 as 764, and the Pacific configured 767-400s (76Hs) as 767. The 762 does not fly into the pacific at all.
777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 20 Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2122 times:
Nearly every 767 is flying the line on any given day.
Aviationhack From United States of America, joined May 2004, 113 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1922 times:
Does CO have any options on 764's? Also anyone know how well it's performing for CO?
Gigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16215 posts, RR: 88 Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1872 times:
Cb777 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1216 posts, RR: 4 Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1517 times:
Toxtethogrady From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 938 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1299 times:
Continental is currently getting 14 block hour days of utilization out of their 767's and 777's. While they might not buy, I would think they'd be looking for leased aircraft too fill in the gaps. More likely, the 762's will come off the domestic routes to go overseas, and 757's would backfill for 767's on some of the European routes. CO has sworn off aircraft purachases for at least the next 2-3 years...
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1107 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Nov 2003, 1276 posts, 
From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 545 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
