Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 757 And 767 Production Efficiency  
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9385 posts, RR: 52
Posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3184 times:

It seems like the 767 will be in production for a few years longer then the 757. My question is, why did Boeing decide to produce the the two planes separately? They were designed together and have a great deal of commonality with each other. However Boeing began 757 production in Renton and 767 in Everett which is over 30 miles away.

It seems like they could have saved costs by having the planes produced side by side. the 757 and 737 aren't very similar with the exception of being narrowbodies, and likewise the 767 and 747 don't share much in common either. There have been a number of threads about Boeing production efficiency recently and how it isn't as good as Airbus. So why did Boeing put themselves at a disadvantage from the beginning by eliminating the economies of scale of an integrated production system? Was it due to land space, unions, or some other reason? If they were produced side by side, then would the 757 probably still be in production rather then getting phased out because of poor sales and in favor of increasing 737 production?

Any comments are appreciated.


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN1120a From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26196 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3166 times:

The reason the 757 and 737 are better suited to be built together is because they have the same fuselage crossection and are much easier to park in the smaller building at RNT, while the Everett plant was built specifically for the 747 and other widebody planes. It is the largest building in the world and is what is needed to house the wider planes. The Commonality betweed the 757 and 767 has more to do with their cockpit and flying dynamics and design, so little is gained by building them together


Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3153 times:

RoseFlyer:

Much of the 757 was produced in Wichita, alongside the 737. Parts for both aircraft were transported to Renton for final assembly. So there are some common systems, but there in some ways, the 757 had more in common with the 737 than 767. You can't transport the 767 parts as easily...much of it had to be produced in-place.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
757 And 767 Production posted Tue Apr 13 2004 21:38:13 by Col
Question About Largest Operators Of 757 And 767? posted Mon Jul 3 2006 23:32:51 by 1337Delta764
Boeing To End 767 Production In 2007 posted Wed May 3 2006 01:21:29 by American 767
757 And 767 posted Mon Jan 9 2006 02:12:13 by Fvyfireman
757 And 767-400 Cockpits posted Sat Jul 30 2005 03:30:34 by Patches
New Delta 757 And 767 Interiors? posted Wed Jun 29 2005 06:12:36 by Jrlander
What Was So Wrong With 757 And 767? posted Wed Dec 15 2004 23:50:50 by A380900
DL ATL-FLL Now All Boeing 737 And 767! posted Mon Apr 5 2004 06:21:57 by Flairport
Boeing 757 Vs. 767 posted Sun Feb 22 2004 00:53:44 by Iluv727s
Why PA Never Had 757's And 767's? posted Mon Nov 10 2003 17:26:15 by B752fanatic