Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Emirates Ads In Canadian Business Magazine  
User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2646 times:

I was just going though Canadian Business Magazine and I came across an Ad for EK.

That is a strong signal that EK is wanting to start operations to Canada...
what do you guys think

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2583 times:

Exciting indeed...

Toronto would be profitable on the long run. But I heard they won't add Toronto until New York and San Fransisco are proved profitable (did they start to SFO??? excuse my ignorance there if they didnt).



If there is a will, there is a way
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2579 times:

not only did they not start SFO,they removed it from their website..  Sad


"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineEurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2570 times:

ooops...Well I believe Toronto has a bigger market than San Fransisco. For one, the large Sub-continent community in Toronto (Indian, Pakistani) would find a Dubai connection very convenient and the fares may be competitive. The only issue is the question of yields. To the best of my knowledge, the amount and extent of construction and business in Dubai involves an increasing number of Canadian companies most of whom are based in Ontario, I would therefore conclude that yields won't be bad at all.

Hope to see an Emirates A380 in YYZ soon  Big thumbs up



If there is a will, there is a way
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 59
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2516 times:

lol..not sure about the BumbleBee-380 anytime soon

do you know how the yields are on PK's 777's?




"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 5010 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2512 times:

"Dubai involves an increasing number of Canadian companies most of whom are based in Ontario, I would therefore conclude that yields won't be bad at all."

-Prove this. I sincerely doubt it.



User currently offlineEurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2466 times:

OK, brainstorming, I will name a few:

- SNC Lavalin (lucrative gas-related projects)
- A host of engineering and financial institutions that I cant recall.

There is a website somewhere related to the trade between the UAE and Canada...will dig it up.

Thanks




If there is a will, there is a way
User currently offlineEurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2453 times:

FLYYUL,

Here is some information I got from a Canadian government website:

-----

Trade dominates Canada's relations with the UAE. The volume of Canadian exports to UAE reached $ CAD 224.3 million in 2000 and have been growing faster than with any other country in the Middle East and North Africa (more than fourfold since 1992). Over 40 Canadian companies have established offices in the UAE. The Embassy and Consulate are currently assisting Canadian companies in pursuing over $2 billion of projects.

The Canadian Business Councils (CBC) in Abu Dhabi and Dubai were established by Canadian companies resident in the UAE to promote trade relations and exchange of information amongst their members. The CBC in Abu Dhabi has some 75 members and the CBC in Dubai 143.

Overall relations between Canada and the UAE have been further strengthened by the increase in exchange of high-level visits such as the visit of the Governor General in March 1998, and by the Canadian Minister of International Trade and the Québec Deputy Premier in 1999.





If there is a will, there is a way
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2380 times:

Yes we all know EK would do v well from YYZ with multiple weekly A 345s nonstop from DXB but unless they negiotiate a settlement with AC regarding how many flights they are allowed to fly to YYZ from DXB...nothing will be sure.

AC dont want EK to fly daily as they only want to fly max 4 weekly to DXB and plus GF and EY have too asked for slots at YYZ so it will be unfair for AC to compete against 3 carriers all eyeing for their East African, Indo-Pak, DEL, BOM, DAC, CMB and Arab traffic. AC carries for these 3 Gulf carriers a lot of their pax transatlantic to LHR-CDG-FRA where then they connect to the Gulf carrier via the Gulf city hub to their final destination. All in all AC feels the biggest loser here and only want EK to fly 4 weekly max and not daily.


User currently offlineEurostarVA From Bahrain, joined May 2002, 1296 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

I do not recall Air Canada as having indicated interest in serving any Middle Eastern destination eastward than Beirut. In fact, I can hardly imagine them starting a new service to the Gulf. I think it would be smarter for Air Canada to allow Emirates to develop the market, before it enters it itself a few years later. I believe that an Emirates service will run more efficiently as a daily flight and not 3-4 weekly.

Therefore I don't think Air Canada has much to loose in allowing an Emirates daily service to develop/explore the market.




If there is a will, there is a way
User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3503 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2307 times:


Why SFO and not LAX ?

Los Angeles is a bigger metropole and a bigger hub too, and the number Arabs there is more significant, AFAIK !!!


User currently offlineEK773 From Malta, joined Jul 2004, 237 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2227 times:

Why is AC so heavily protected by the Canadian government? This disagreement about EK frequencies sounds similar to the spat they had many years ago with SQ. AC seems to be very scared of decent rated competition.



User currently offlineDYK From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2151 times:

EK773

So true, typically Canadian not Air Canada!



AC,CP,PW,WD,ND,UA,AA,NW,CO,DL,WA,AS,QX,PR,SQ,AI,TG,MH,JL,9W,IC,UL,PG,BW,NZ,QF,DJ,BA,LH,KL,OA,OS,ME,RJ,HA,AQ
User currently offlineLazionic From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 21 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

I have also seen EK advertising in the National Post. I remember last summer EK was looking to hire filght attendants from the YYZ area. AC has DXB on thier list of future routes, from what was shown on a presentation I saw in YYZ.


Man who walk through airport turnstile sideways going to Bangkok.
User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2093 times:

I don't think AC is scared of any Origin-Destination competition with EK on Dubai. The issue is poaching of third country traffic. International bilateral agreements are based on the concept of balance of benefits. You give rights as good as you get. Canada-Dubai is basically an Origin-Destination route for AC, but a major hub route for EK. So where is the balance of benefits? What does AC (or any other Canadian carrier) get in exchange? The Emirates government agreed to this bilateral agreement, but not EK seems to be changing the terms. If they have a better deal to offer Canada, let them ask their government to amend the bilateral agreement.


And why does AC have to twist itself into a pretzel to accommodate EK? Let EK start the route with four frequencies. I'm sure they can make money. If they are holding out for daily service as a prerequisite for starting service, it sounds like an excuse to me. They want optimum profitability handed to them on a platter.

They should go on the route, prove its worth and stop whining.

As for the ads, keep in mind that a lot of Canadians travelling around the world fly EK as connections in Europe or Asia. The ads do not in and of themselves say a damn thing about the carrier's intentions towards Canada. I've seen ads in Canadian publications for South African Airways because you go get their flights in the U.S. It doesn't mean SAA sees Canada as a market it wants to serve directly any time soon.











User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 5010 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2085 times:

"SNC Lavalin (lucrative gas-related projects"

-SNC lavalin is Montreal-based.



User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2072 times:

I would add to my previous post that EK's bid to enter Canada with more flights than the bilateral currently allows might be helped if governments like India or Pakistan consent to more liberal access to their countries for AC. That would make the fifth freedom provisions in the current UAE-Cda bilateral meaningful to AC and thus redress the current imbalance of benefits. Or might that make EK unhappy? It seems as if EK wants everything its way. Quite often, these fifth freedom rights are included in bilateral air agreement because nobody expects them to be extensively utilized except perhaps through codesharing. Canada learned the hard way with AC's YYZ-LHR-BOM-SIN route that there is a thing as being too successful in using fifth freedom rights. Would EK be so pro-competition if AC started a Toronto-Dubai-Lahore route and actually filled the Dubai-Lahore portion with commuting Pakistani guest workers, cutting into EK's big market share there? Chances are they would not. Let Canada and India conclude an open skies agreement (they are in negotiations), and then have the UAE government waive the 50% capacity ceiling for AC on Dubai-Bombay fifth freedoms, and I bet AC wouldn't be so against daily service for EK to YYZ.









User currently offlineETStar From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1971 times:

You would be surprised how many travel agencies look to EK whenever one requests a fare quote to places in the indian subcontinent, middle east or africa, even though EK does not serve all places nor any single point in Canada. I know people who go to East Africa via Dubai (yes, after going to Europe using Air Canada or Ba or Lufthansa) in order to get to their final destination. Perhaps EK has a generous agent comission structure?

User currently offlineYegbey01 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1732 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1918 times:

Toronto based engineering/construction/consulting firms are quite involved in some really large projects in Dubai. As a matter of fact, many of teh projects at the Dubai Marina project were designed by Toronto based firms...

When I worked in Dubai 6 years ago, there was a significant contingent of Canadians in Dubai (but also in other parts of the UAE).

Would be nice to see EK here in Toronto.


User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4852 posts, RR: 44
Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1880 times:

Emirates should have learnt from their JFK mistakes that its not feasible to start such a long haul and possibly price conscious market with daily 260 seater flights!!! 4 weekly is fine and they shouldnt cry about it.

The vast majority of their target market pax from YYZ will be low yield ones going to NBO-DAR-ADD-LHE-ISB-KHI-INDIA-CMB-Arabia-DAC who usually scout the cheapest deal available in the market. Thats why u see Aeroflot having a considerable market share of pax on the YYZ-DEL-YYZ route!!!

If u ask me, 4 weekly DXB-YYZ-DXB A 345s for EK is absolutely fine for the time being and if they want more, well then they should lobby in the future for that using their govt's influence and other methods.


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1863 times:

Sebring, AFAIK the Canada-UAE bilateral only grants fifth-freedom rights (with the 50% capacity restriction you mention) between INTERMEDIATE POINTS and the UAE, not between the UAE and POINTS BEYOND. Hence, your points about capacity would be moot anyway.

Furthermore, the capacity restriction on 4x weekly services has long expired and there are now 6x weekly services permitted in each direction as of June 2003.

Finally, while Canada and India have been in discussions for a new Air Services Agreement for years now, neither have ever signed an open skies agreement with another country and I highly doubt they will begin now with each other.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ads In UK Newspapers Today - The Anti-flying Lobby posted Mon Feb 5 2007 16:30:30 by Kaitak
PSA Ads In "In Persuit Of Happyness" posted Sun Dec 17 2006 01:55:15 by Lincoln
Emirates Variations In Cabin Interior posted Wed Nov 29 2006 22:56:02 by LXA340
A350 Ad In Flight International Magazine posted Fri Oct 20 2006 00:18:10 by ConcordeLoss
Delta Ads In Brasil posted Tue Jun 20 2006 04:20:11 by Sampa737
Airline Ads In Your Area. posted Sun Jun 4 2006 10:14:08 by DC10Widebody
Safety In Canadian Skies posted Sun Jun 4 2006 06:34:46 by Yhmfan
Emirates A310F In FLL? posted Tue Mar 14 2006 13:25:45 by Falcon flyer
Emirates "In Talks" For 20 A340-600E posted Wed Jan 25 2006 13:24:19 by PanAm_DC10
Emirates 777´s In J Class. posted Tue Jan 24 2006 19:58:07 by Paul